Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry
CSWG
1 other identifier
observational
5,000
1 country
16
Brief Summary
The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group is a multicenter registry where we collect de-identified clinical variables from the medical records and follow-up phone calls of shock patients from multiple institutions and centralize this data to a single registry for analysis of clinical outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedJune 6, 2025
June 1, 2025
8.1 years
December 7, 2020
June 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Rate of Mortality
Death in subjects during the time frame.
30 days after discharge
Rate of Mortality
Death in subjects during the time frame.
1 year after discharge
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Rate of Re-hospitalization
30 day after discharge
Rate of Re-hospitalization
1 year after discharge
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
30 day after discharge
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
1 year after discharge
Study Arms (1)
Cardiogenic Shock Patients
Cardiogenic Shock patients eligible for this study are defined by at least one of the two categories below. 1. Patients have at least 2 of the following concurrently at any point during the index hospitalization: MAP \< 60mmHg or a \>30mmHg drop in MAP from baseline, SBP \< 90mmHg or a \>30mmHg drop in SBP from baseline, Pulse \> 100, Cardiac Index \< 2.2, Cardiac Power Output ≤ 0.6 or PAPI \< 1.0. 2. Patients require the use of at least 1 vasopressor, inotrope or acute mechanical circulatory support device to maintain values above the above targets.
Interventions
The vasopressors include phenylephrine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine and vasopressin.
Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support devices include ECMO (VV), ECMO (VA), Impella CP, Impella 2.5, Impella 5.0, Impella 5.5, Impella RP, IABP, Centrimag, Tandem Heart and ProTek Duo.
Eligibility Criteria
People who are 18 or older who have an official diagnosis of cardiogenic shock.
You may qualify if:
- Patients must have cardiogenic shock.
- Cardiogenic shock is defined by at least one of the two categories below:
- At least 2 of the following concurrently at any point during the index hospitalization:
- Cardiac Index \< 2.2
- PAPI \< 1.0
- Cardiac Power Output ≤ 0.6
- MAP \< 60mmHg or a \>30mmHg drop in MAP from baseline
- SBP \< 90mmHg or a \>30mmHg drop in SBP from baseline
- Pulse \> 100
- Require at least one acute mechanical circulatory support device, vasopressor or inotrope to maintain values above the above target.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tufts Medical Centerlead
- Abbottcollaborator
- Boston Scientific Corporationcollaborator
- Abiomed Inc.collaborator
- Getinge Groupcollaborator
Study Sites (16)
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, 33331, United States
Northwestern Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, 04102, United States
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Hackensack Meridian Health
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Providence St. Vincent Heart Clinic
Portland, Oregon, 97225, United States
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States
University Of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261, United States
Baylor Scott & White Advanced Heart Failure Clinic
Dallas, Texas, 75201, United States
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555, United States
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Inova Health System
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195-9472, United States
Related Publications (10)
Kapur NK, Thayer KL, Zweck E. Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):16-21. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-1-16.
PMID: 32280413BACKGROUNDPahuja M, Chehab O, Ranka S, Mishra T, Ando T, Yassin AS, Thayer KL, Shah P, Kimmelstiel CD, Salehi P, Kapur NK. Incidence and clinical outcomes of stroke in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 1;97(2):217-225. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28919. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
PMID: 32352638BACKGROUNDThayer KL, Zweck E, Ayouty M, Garan AR, Hernandez-Montfort J, Mahr C, Morine KJ, Newman S, Jorde L, Haywood JL, Harwani NM, Esposito ML, Davila CD, Wencker D, Sinha SS, Vorovich E, Abraham J, O'Neill W, Udelson J, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Classification of In-Hospital Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e007099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007099. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
PMID: 32900234BACKGROUNDWhitehead E, Thayer K, Kapur NK. Clinical trials of acute mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020 Jul;35(4):332-340. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000751.
PMID: 32487943BACKGROUNDKapur NK, Whitehead EH, Thayer KL, Pahuja M. The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety. F1000Res. 2020 Jul 29;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-794. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25518.1. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32765837BACKGROUNDGaran AR, Kanwar M, Thayer KL, Whitehead E, Zweck E, Hernandez-Montfort J, Mahr C, Haywood JL, Harwani NM, Wencker D, Sinha SS, Vorovich E, Abraham J, O'Neill W, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Complete Hemodynamic Profiling With Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In-Hospital Mortality. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;8(11):903-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.012.
PMID: 33121702BACKGROUNDWhitehead EH, Thayer KL, Burkhoff D, Uriel N, Ohman EM, O'Neill W, Kapur NK. Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Aug 28;7:155. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00155. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33005634BACKGROUNDPahuja M, Ranka S, Chehab O, Mishra T, Akintoye E, Adegbala O, Yassin AS, Ando T, Thayer KL, Shah P, Kimmelstiel CD, Salehi P, Kapur NK. Incidence and clinical outcomes of bleeding complications and acute limb ischemia in STEMI and cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97(6):1129-1138. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29003. Epub 2020 May 30.
PMID: 32473083BACKGROUNDHernandez-Montfort J, Kanwar M, Sinha SS, Garan AR, Blumer V, Kataria R, Whitehead EH, Yin M, Li B, Zhang Y, Thayer KL, Baca P, Dieng F, Harwani NM, Guglin M, Abraham J, Hickey G, Nathan S, Wencker D, Hall S, Schwartzman A, Khalife W, Li S, Mahr C, Kim J, Vorovich E, Pahuja M, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock. JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
PMID: 36342421DERIVEDKapur NK, Kanwar M, Sinha SS, Thayer KL, Garan AR, Hernandez-Montfort J, Zhang Y, Li B, Baca P, Dieng F, Harwani NM, Abraham J, Hickey G, Nathan S, Wencker D, Hall S, Schwartzman A, Khalife W, Li S, Mahr C, Kim JH, Vorovich E, Whitehead EH, Blumer V, Burkhoff D. Criteria for Defining Stages of Cardiogenic Shock Severity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 19;80(3):185-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.049.
PMID: 35835491DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Reshad Garan, MD
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Claudius Mahr, DO
University of Washington
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, MD
Cleveland Clinic Foundation-Florida
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Daniel Burkhoff, MD PhD
CardioVascular Research Foundation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 1 Year
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2020
First Posted
December 23, 2020
Study Start
December 4, 2017
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share