Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation During Pediatric Dental Surgery
Laryngoscopy
1 other identifier
observational
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background and Objective: Airway control is a condition that should be evaluated primarily in anesthesia practice in the pediatric age group. Failed intubation or prolonged intubation duration can cause atelectasis and hypoxia in children. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of Macintosh laryngoscopy and McGrath videolaryngoscopy on hemodynamic parameters in pediatric patients who were scheduled to undergo elective dental surgery and required intubation for the application of general anesthesia. Methods: Sixty-six patients were divided into two groups according to the procedure used during intubation, namely, direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy. The Cormack-Lehane and Mallampati scores, intubation duration, heart rate at minutes 0, 1, 3 and 5 during intubation, mean arterial pressure, EtCO2and SpO2 values were recorded for all the patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Nov 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2020
CompletedDecember 21, 2020
December 1, 2020
4 months
November 29, 2020
December 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (20)
Heart Rate
Heart Rate (HR)
During surgery 0. minute
Heart Rate
Heart Rate (HR)
During surgery 1. minute
Heart Rate
Heart Rate (HR)
During surgery 3. minute
Heart Rate
Heart Rate (HR)
During surgery 5. minute
Heart Rate
Heart Rate (HR)
During surgery 10. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
During surgery 0. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
During surgery 1. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
During surgery 3. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
During surgery 5. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
During surgery 10. minute
Saturation
SpO2
During surgery 0. minute
Saturation
SpO2
During surgery 1. minute
Saturation
SpO2
During surgery 3. minute
Saturation
SpO2
During surgery 5. minute
Saturation
SpO2
During surgery 10. minute
End Tidal Carbondioxide
EtCO2
During surgery 0. minute
End Tidal Carbondioxide
EtCO2
During surgery 1. minute
End Tidal Carbondioxide
EtCO2
During surgery 3. minute
End Tidal Carbondioxide
EtCO2
During surgery 5. minute
End Tidal Carbondioxide
EtCO2
During surgery 10. minute
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Entubation Time
During Surgery 1.minute
Entubation Time
During Surgery 2.minute
Entubation Time
During Surgery 3.minute
Study Arms (2)
Group Direct Laringoscopy
Group DL: Group of patients intubated using a Macintoch blade laryngoscope.
Group Videolaringoscopy
Group VL: Group of patients intubated using a McGrath video laryngoscope.
Interventions
During the intubation, the head of the patient was kept in a neutral position, patients were nasotracheally intubated
Eligibility Criteria
The study included 66 ASA I-II patients with an age range of 4-13 years and who were scheduled for elective dental surgery under general anesthesia with intubation.
You may qualify if:
- Healthy children between the ages of 4-13
- Ordu University School of Medicine ,pediatric age group ,elective oral surgery 4-13 years and who were scheduled for elective oral surgery under general anesthesia with intubation If Patients with a Cormack -Lehane score 1,2 or 3 and if Mallampathy score of 1,2 or 3 were inccluded from the study
You may not qualify if:
- With malignancy disease patients
- with norological disorders
- with congenital heart disease
- with airway abnormality
- with airway disease patients
- Patients age Under 4 years , Above 13 years
- If Patients with a Cormack -Lehane score 4 and if Mallampathy score of 4 were excluded from the study -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ordu Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Ordu University School of Medicine ,Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Ordu, 52200, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ebru Canakci, MD
Ordu University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
- STUDY CHAIR
Ahmet Gultekin, MD
Namık Kemal University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 7 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.,Associated Professor ,Head of Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2020
First Posted
December 21, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
December 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share