Comparison of PENG Block and FICB in Hip Fracture Patients
Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block on Dynamic Pain in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) has been considered the block of choice for patients with hip fracture. However, pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, one of the relatively newly-developed blocks, could be also used for analgesia in patients with hip fracture. Since PENG block could block the accessory obturator nerve, PENG block might have greater analgesic effects compared to FICB theoretically. However, the comparison of these two blocks in patients with hip fracture has not performed in clinical setting. Thus, we aimed to compare the analgesic effect of PENG block and FICB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 11, 2022
CompletedMarch 23, 2022
March 1, 2022
1 year
December 10, 2020
March 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of each block (Pain score)
We will assess the dynamic pain (pain during a movement) using NRS before and 20-30min after applying the assigned block. Then, we will calculate the change of NRS at the two time-points. NRS: Numerical rating scale (0, no pain; 10, the worst pain imaginable)
before surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
change of blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure)
before surgery
postoperative pain score
postoperative 6, 24, 48hours
postoperative opioid consumption
postoperative 24, 48hours
postoperative motor function
postoperative 6, 24, 48hours
change of heart rate
before surgery
Study Arms (2)
PENG group
EXPERIMENTALpericapsular nerve group (PENG) block before surgery
FICB group
ACTIVE COMPARATORsuprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) before surgery
Interventions
ultrasound-guided PENG block with 0.3% ropivacaine 20cc
ultrasound-guided suprainguinal FICB with 0.3% ropivacaine 30cc
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA PS 1-4
- age: ≥19
- baseline pain score (associated with hip fracture): ≥4
You may not qualify if:
- patients who do not agree to participate in this study
- patients with uncontrolled hypertension, hyperthyroidism, severe dementia
- allergic to ropivacaine
- contraindicated to spinal anesthesia due to coagulopathy, severe aortic stenosis/mitral stenosis, or active infection on lumbar region
- patients who are considered ineligible with any other reason by investigators
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Koh WU, Kim H, Kim YJ, Park JI, Yeo HJ, Ro YJ, Kim HJ. Comparison of analgesic effect of pericapsular nerve group block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block on dynamic pain in patients with hip fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Aug 5;50(8):635-640. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105627.
PMID: 38866559DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Won Uk Koh, MD, PhD
Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2020
First Posted
December 21, 2020
Study Start
January 21, 2021
Primary Completion
January 26, 2022
Study Completion
February 11, 2022
Last Updated
March 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share