Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for AF Patients Unable to Use Oral Anticoagulation Therapy
COMPARE-LAAO
Comparing Effectiveness and Safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients at High Stroke Risk Unable to Use Oral Anticoagulation Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
609
1 country
14
Brief Summary
Up to 5% of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) patients may have or develop contraindications to use oral anticoagulation (OAC). Randomized controlled trial (RCT) data suggest that Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) may provide a non-inferior alternative for cardioembolic stroke protection in patients tolerant to OAC. However, RCT data for LAAO is lacking in patients with contra-indications to OAC using antiplatelet (APT) or no therapy as usual care. The hypothesis underlying this trial is to demonstrate that LAAO is superior to usual care for the prevention of stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
ExpectedJune 21, 2024
June 1, 2024
5.3 years
November 25, 2020
June 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Time to first occurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic or undetermined stroke.
Minimal follow up is 1 year, maximum follow up +/- 5 years
Time to first occurrence of the composite of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic or undetermined), TIA and systemic embolism.
Minimal follow up is 1 year, maximum follow up +/- 5 years
Incidence of procedural complications
Defined as major procedure-related events that require prolonged hospitalization and/or specific treatment, or that lead to permanent physical or mental disability, including but not limited to: pericardiocentesis, major access site bleeding (BARC), any other major bleeding (BARC), device dislocation from the LAA to the heart or aorta, stroke, death, or other severe complications that are considered due to the procedure
Procedure up to 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (19)
The composite event rate of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), TIA, systemic embolism and cardiovascular death.
Through study completion, an average of 3 years
Ischemic stroke event rate
Through study completion, an average of 3 years
Disabling stroke event rate
Through study completion, an average of 3 years
Hemorrhagic stroke event rate
Through study completion, an average of 3 years
TIA event rate
Through study completion, an average of 3 years
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention arm - Left atrial appendage occlusion (with Watchman FLX or Amplatzer Amulet device)
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to the intervention arm will receive left atrial appendage occlusion. In order to prevent device-related thrombus, they will use dual antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylzuur + clopidogrel) for three months and single antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylzuur) until at least 12 months after the procedure.
Control arm - no or usual care
NO INTERVENTIONThe patients in the control arm will stay on optimal treatment as decided by the referring physician (antiplatelet therapy or nothing).
Interventions
Currently, there are two devices available on the Dutch market, Watchman and Amulet. After randomization to the intervention arm, additional randomization for type of device will follow. If the amount of procedures is too small to implant two devices, the centre will implant a device of choice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Documented non-valvular AF (paroxysmal or non-paroxysmal) and
- CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more and
- Unsuitable for long-term use of oral anticoagulation as determined by the referring physician team as well as the multidisciplinary team in the study hospital and
- Suitable for dual APT for at least 3 months and single APT from 3 until at most 12 months and
- At least 18 years of age, and willing and able to provide informed consent and adhere to study rules and regulations and follow-up
- The decision of suitability for LAAO should be made by a multidisciplinary team consisting of at least an echocardiographist, an implanting cardiologist, and a cardiac surgeon. The decision of unsuitability for oral anticoagulation by the referring and implanting centers will be clearly and extensively documented in the study charts. This should include the support of physicians other than the referring and implanting cardiologist. These physicians should be specialists in the field where the contra-indication arises such as neurology, gastro-enterology, internal medicine, urology, or other specialties. In many cases the contra-indication may be due to (repeated) major bleeding.Bleeding will be classified according to the BARC criteria as major with a score of 3 or more. The risk of recurrent bleeding should be established by a multidisciplinary team, as well as the decision that the risk of bleeding recurrence outweighs the benefit of restarting oral anticoagulation, which will be documented in the charts. Alternative reasons not to use anticoagulation should be major and irreversible. These may be highly variable and may include but are not limited to occupational or life-style hazards, drug side-effects, ineffectiveness, intolerance, renal or liver failure, falling hazards, vascular problems, cerebral amyloid deposition, and coagulation disorders.
You may not qualify if:
- Any invasive cardiac procedure within 30 days prior to randomization and 90 days after LAAO that would interfere with the study follow-up and medication
- Unsuitable LAA anatomy for closure or thrombus in the LAA at the time of procedure
- Contraindications or unfavourable conditions to perform cardiac catheterization or TEE
- Atrial septal malformations, atrial septal defect or a high-risk patient foramen ovale that may cause thrombo-embolic events
- Atrial septal defect repair or closure device or a patent foramen ovale repair or any other anatomical condition as this may preclude an LAAO procedure
- LVEF\<31% and/or heart failure NYHA 3-4
- Mitral valve regurgitation grade 3 or more
- Mitral stenosis as this makes AF by definition valvular in nature
- Aortic valve stenosis (AVA\<1.0 cm2 or Pmax\>50 mmHg) or regurgitation grade 3 or more
- Planned cardiac surgery for any reason within 3 months
- Planned CEA for significant carotid artery disease
- Compelling medical reason to use VKA or NOAC (e.g. mechanical heart valve, pulmonary embolism, ventricular aneurysm)
- Major contraindications for using aspirin or clopidogrel
- (planned) pregnancy
- Participation in any other clinical trial that interferes with the current study
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
Radboud UMC
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GA, Netherlands
Maastricht UMC
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands
Amphia Hospital
Breda, North Brabant, 4818 CK, Netherlands
OLVG
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1091 AC, Netherlands
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
St Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, North Holland, 3435 CM, Netherlands
Medical Spectrum Twente
Enschede, Overijssel, 7512 KZ, Netherlands
Isala Clinics
Zwolle, Overijssel, 8025 BT, Netherlands
Medical Center Leeuwarden
Leeuwarden, Provincie Friesland, 8934 AD, Netherlands
Leiden UMC
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 GD, Netherlands
Haga Hospital
The Hague, South Holland, 2545 AA, Netherlands
UMC Groningen
Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Huijboom M, Maarse M, Aarnink E, van Dijk V, Swaans M, van der Heijden J, IJsselmuiden S, Folkeringa R, Blaauw Y, Elvan A, Stevenhagen J, Vlachojannis G, van der Voort P, Westra S, Chaldoupi M, Khan M, de Groot J, van der Kley F, van Mieghem N, van Dijk E, Dijkgraaf M, Tijssen J, Boersma L. COMPARE LAAO: Rationale and design of the randomized controlled trial "COMPARing Effectiveness and safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion to standard of care for atrial fibrillation patients at high stroke risk and ineligible to use oral anticoagulation therapy". Am Heart J. 2022 Aug;250:45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 7.
PMID: 35537503DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lucas VA Boersma, Prof. Dr.
St Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2020
First Posted
December 21, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- After publishing the main study articles, all data will be available.
- Access Criteria
- Specific degrees in the field of research have to be demonstrated, as well as links with hospitals or research institutes (e.g. an employee contract) of the researcher/physician.
During/at the end of the study, the database will be transfered to the 'Dutch Heart Registry' (https://nederlandsehartregistratie.nl/). This registry keeps track of all implantable devices that are within the national health insurance package. In this way, data can be obtained by other researchers (fair data principle).