NCT04673500

Brief Summary

Title: Assessment of pain on lidocaine-Propofol admixture injection: Comparing large antecubital vein and small vein dorsum of hand.

  • Objective: To evaluate the pain on Propofol - lidocaine admixture injection using different sizes of veins on upper limb.
  • Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial Place and duration of study: Department of Anesthesia, King Saud University Riyadh May 1, 2013 - May 31, 2014).
  • Patient and methods: Total 160 adult patients were divided in two groups. Age 20-50 years of either gender, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class 1 and 2, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were included in the study. Patients with known history of allergy to lidocaine or Propofol, obese patients, anticipated difficult intubation, already on any analgesics and pregnant patients were excluded from the study. Both groups received an admixture of Propofol (1%) - lidocaine (2%) on induction of anesthesia through antecubital vein (Group- 1) or through a vein on dorsum of hand (Group- 2). Pain was assessed as none, mild, moderate or severe. Results: Moderate to severe pain on intravenous injection of Propofol-lidocaine admixture through antecubital vein and small vein on dorsum of hand was 20% vs 71%. Conclusion: There is marked reduction of pain when Propofol - lidocaine admixture was injected through antecubital vein as compared to small vein on dorsum of hand.
  • Key words: Propofol, injection, pain

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2014

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 10, 2016

Completed
4 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 17, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 17, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 10, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 12, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

PropofolInjection painVeins

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessment of severity of pain on propofol injection

    A 20 gauge intravenous catheter was inserted either in large antecubital vein or in a small vein on dorsum of hand. An initial 30% of a mixture of propofol lidocaine was given to assess the severity of pain on propofol injection before the patient sleeps. The pain on propofol injection was assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS). 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable

    From preoperative to day one postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Heart rate

    From base line pre-propofol injection to Intraoperative after full dose of propofol injection.

Study Arms (2)

Propofol-lidocaine through large vein

EXPERIMENTAL

Eighty patients randomly assigned in this arm received a 20 gauge intravenous catheter at the antecubital fossa and a mixture of 2% lidocaine 1 ml and 1% propofol 2mg/kg was given for induction of general anesthesia.

Drug: Propofol lidocaine through large vein

Propofol-lidocaine through small vein

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Another eighty patients randomly assigned in this arm received a 20 gauge intravenous catheter at the dorsum of hand and a mixture of 2% lidocaine 1 ml and 1% propofol 2mg/kg was given for induction of general anesthesia.

Drug: Propofol lidocaine through small vein

Interventions

A mixture of 2% lidocaine 1 ml and 1% propofol 2mg/kg was given through a large antecubital vein to assess pain severity on propofol injection during general anesthesia induction

Also known as: Group I
Propofol-lidocaine through large vein

A mixture of 2% lidocaine 1 ml and 1% propofol 2mg/kg was given through a small vein on the dorsum of hand to assess pain severity on propofol injection during general anesthesia induction

Also known as: Group II
Propofol-lidocaine through small vein

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 20 to 50 years of either gender
  • ASA ( American Society of Anesthesia) class 1 and 2
  • Scheduled for elective surgical procedure under general anesthesia

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with known history of allergy to lidocaine or Propofol
  • Obese patients
  • Anticipated difficult intubation
  • ASA 3 and 4
  • Already on any analgesics and pregnant patients

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Abdul Sattar Narejo

Riyadh, 7805, Saudi Arabia

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Marik PE. Propofol: therapeutic indications and side-effects. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(29):3639-49. doi: 10.2174/1381612043382846.

    PMID: 15579060BACKGROUND
  • Sim JY, Lee SH, Park DY, Jung JA, Ki KH, Lee DH, Noh GJ. Pain on injection with microemulsion propofol. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Mar;67(3):316-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03358.x. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

    PMID: 19220277BACKGROUND
  • Dubey PK, Kumar A. Pain on injection of lipid-free propofol and propofol emulsion containing medium-chain triglyceride: a comparative study. Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct;101(4):1060-1062. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000166951.72702.05.

    PMID: 16192520BACKGROUND
  • Nakane M, Iwama H. A potential mechanism of propofol-induced pain on injection based on studies using nafamostat mesilate. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Sep;83(3):397-404. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.3.397.

    PMID: 10655909BACKGROUND
  • Ambesh SP, Dubey PK, Sinha PK. Ondansetron pretreatment to alleviate pain on propofol injection: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jul;89(1):197-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199907000-00035.

    PMID: 10389803BACKGROUND
  • Jalota L, Kalira V, George E, Shi YY, Hornuss C, Radke O, Pace NL, Apfel CC; Perioperative Clinical Research Core. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Mar 15;342:d1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1110.

    PMID: 21406529BACKGROUND
  • Walker BJ, Neal JM, Mulroy MF, Humsi JA, Bittner RC, McDonald SB. Lidocaine pretreatment with tourniquet versus lidocaine-propofol admixture for attenuating propofol injection pain: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820306da.

    PMID: 21455088BACKGROUND
  • Kim DH, Chae YJ, Chang HS, Kim JA, Joe HB. Intravenous lidocaine pretreatment with venous occlusion for reducing microemulsion propofol induced pain: comparison of three doses of lidocaine. J Int Med Res. 2014 Apr;42(2):368-75. doi: 10.1177/0300060513507391. Epub 2014 Mar 4.

    PMID: 24595146BACKGROUND
  • Bano F, Zafar S, Sabbar S, Aftab S, Haider S, Sultan ST. Intravenous ketamine attenuates injection pain and arterial pressure changes during the induction of anesthesia with propofol: a comparison with lidocaine. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Jul;17(7):390-3.

    PMID: 17686348BACKGROUND
  • Fujii Y, Itakura M. A comparison of pretreatment with fentanyl and lidocaine preceded by venous occlusion for reducing pain on injection of propofol: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adult Japanese surgical patients. Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.012.

    PMID: 19922881BACKGROUND
  • Alipour M, Tabari M, Alipour M. Paracetamol, ondansetron, granisetron, magnesium sulfate and lidocaine and reduced propofol injection pain. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Mar;16(3):e16086. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.16086. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

    PMID: 24829787BACKGROUND
  • Rahimzadeh P, Faiz SH, Nikoobakht N, Ghodrati MR. Which one is more efficient on propofol 2% injection pain? Magnesium sulfate or ondansetron: A randomized clinical trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2015 Feb 17;4:56. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.151593. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 25802825BACKGROUND
  • Borazan H, Sahin O, Kececioglu A, Uluer MS, Et T, Otelcioglu S. Prevention of propofol injection pain in children: a comparison of pretreatment with tramadol and propofol-lidocaine mixture. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(6):492-7. doi: 10.7150/ijms.4793. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

    PMID: 22927775BACKGROUND
  • Canbay O, Celebi N, Arun O, Karagoz AH, Saricaoglu F, Ozgen S. Efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen and lidocaine on propofol injection pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):95-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem301. Epub 2007 Oct 23.

    PMID: 17959585BACKGROUND
  • Ahmad S, De Oliveira GS Jr, Fitzgerald PC, McCarthy RJ. The effect of intravenous dexamethasone and lidocaine on propofol-induced vascular pain: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Pain Res Treat. 2013;2013:734531. doi: 10.1155/2013/734531. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

    PMID: 23956857BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Abdul Sattar Narejo, FCPS, FCAI

    King Khalid University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The whole arm with the intravenous catheter was covered with a green sheet, from where the mixture of propofol-lidocaine was given.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients were randomized into two groups, eighty each. In all patients 15 to 30 minutes before shifting to the operation room a 20 gauge intravenous catheter was inserted either in a large antecubital vein (Group-1) or in a vein on dorsum of hand (Group-2). Lactate Ringer infusion was initiated at the rate of 120 ml/h. The arm was covered with green sheet. Patients received admixture of 2% lidocaine (1ml) in 1% propofol (19ml) either through large antecubital vein (Group-1, n = 80) or (Group-2, n = 80) through a vein at dorsum of hand. In both groups initially, thirty percent of the calculated dose of propofol (2mg/kg) was injected through an intravenous catheter. All patients were informed to report the researcher about the intensity of pain they experienced in numbers. Then induction of anesthesia was continued as routine.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant Anesthetist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2016

First Posted

December 17, 2020

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

May 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2014

Last Updated

December 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations