Assessment of Pain on Propofol Injection.
Comparison of Large Antecubital Vein Versus Small Vein on Dorsum of Hand for the Prevention of Propofol Injection Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Title: Assessment of pain on lidocaine-Propofol admixture injection: Comparing large antecubital vein and small vein dorsum of hand.
- Objective: To evaluate the pain on Propofol - lidocaine admixture injection using different sizes of veins on upper limb.
- Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial Place and duration of study: Department of Anesthesia, King Saud University Riyadh May 1, 2013 - May 31, 2014).
- Patient and methods: Total 160 adult patients were divided in two groups. Age 20-50 years of either gender, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class 1 and 2, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were included in the study. Patients with known history of allergy to lidocaine or Propofol, obese patients, anticipated difficult intubation, already on any analgesics and pregnant patients were excluded from the study. Both groups received an admixture of Propofol (1%) - lidocaine (2%) on induction of anesthesia through antecubital vein (Group- 1) or through a vein on dorsum of hand (Group- 2). Pain was assessed as none, mild, moderate or severe. Results: Moderate to severe pain on intravenous injection of Propofol-lidocaine admixture through antecubital vein and small vein on dorsum of hand was 20% vs 71%. Conclusion: There is marked reduction of pain when Propofol - lidocaine admixture was injected through antecubital vein as compared to small vein on dorsum of hand.
- Key words: Propofol, injection, pain
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2020
CompletedDecember 17, 2020
December 1, 2020
1 year
December 10, 2016
December 12, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of severity of pain on propofol injection
A 20 gauge intravenous catheter was inserted either in large antecubital vein or in a small vein on dorsum of hand. An initial 30% of a mixture of propofol lidocaine was given to assess the severity of pain on propofol injection before the patient sleeps. The pain on propofol injection was assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS). 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable
From preoperative to day one postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Heart rate
From base line pre-propofol injection to Intraoperative after full dose of propofol injection.
Study Arms (2)
Propofol-lidocaine through large vein
EXPERIMENTALEighty patients randomly assigned in this arm received a 20 gauge intravenous catheter at the antecubital fossa and a mixture of 2% lidocaine 1 ml and 1% propofol 2mg/kg was given for induction of general anesthesia.
Propofol-lidocaine through small vein
PLACEBO COMPARATORAnother eighty patients randomly assigned in this arm received a 20 gauge intravenous catheter at the dorsum of hand and a mixture of 2% lidocaine 1 ml and 1% propofol 2mg/kg was given for induction of general anesthesia.
Interventions
A mixture of 2% lidocaine 1 ml and 1% propofol 2mg/kg was given through a large antecubital vein to assess pain severity on propofol injection during general anesthesia induction
A mixture of 2% lidocaine 1 ml and 1% propofol 2mg/kg was given through a small vein on the dorsum of hand to assess pain severity on propofol injection during general anesthesia induction
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 20 to 50 years of either gender
- ASA ( American Society of Anesthesia) class 1 and 2
- Scheduled for elective surgical procedure under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known history of allergy to lidocaine or Propofol
- Obese patients
- Anticipated difficult intubation
- ASA 3 and 4
- Already on any analgesics and pregnant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Abdul Sattar Narejo
Riyadh, 7805, Saudi Arabia
Related Publications (15)
Marik PE. Propofol: therapeutic indications and side-effects. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(29):3639-49. doi: 10.2174/1381612043382846.
PMID: 15579060BACKGROUNDSim JY, Lee SH, Park DY, Jung JA, Ki KH, Lee DH, Noh GJ. Pain on injection with microemulsion propofol. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Mar;67(3):316-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03358.x. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
PMID: 19220277BACKGROUNDDubey PK, Kumar A. Pain on injection of lipid-free propofol and propofol emulsion containing medium-chain triglyceride: a comparative study. Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct;101(4):1060-1062. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000166951.72702.05.
PMID: 16192520BACKGROUNDNakane M, Iwama H. A potential mechanism of propofol-induced pain on injection based on studies using nafamostat mesilate. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Sep;83(3):397-404. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.3.397.
PMID: 10655909BACKGROUNDAmbesh SP, Dubey PK, Sinha PK. Ondansetron pretreatment to alleviate pain on propofol injection: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jul;89(1):197-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199907000-00035.
PMID: 10389803BACKGROUNDJalota L, Kalira V, George E, Shi YY, Hornuss C, Radke O, Pace NL, Apfel CC; Perioperative Clinical Research Core. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Mar 15;342:d1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1110.
PMID: 21406529BACKGROUNDWalker BJ, Neal JM, Mulroy MF, Humsi JA, Bittner RC, McDonald SB. Lidocaine pretreatment with tourniquet versus lidocaine-propofol admixture for attenuating propofol injection pain: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820306da.
PMID: 21455088BACKGROUNDKim DH, Chae YJ, Chang HS, Kim JA, Joe HB. Intravenous lidocaine pretreatment with venous occlusion for reducing microemulsion propofol induced pain: comparison of three doses of lidocaine. J Int Med Res. 2014 Apr;42(2):368-75. doi: 10.1177/0300060513507391. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
PMID: 24595146BACKGROUNDBano F, Zafar S, Sabbar S, Aftab S, Haider S, Sultan ST. Intravenous ketamine attenuates injection pain and arterial pressure changes during the induction of anesthesia with propofol: a comparison with lidocaine. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Jul;17(7):390-3.
PMID: 17686348BACKGROUNDFujii Y, Itakura M. A comparison of pretreatment with fentanyl and lidocaine preceded by venous occlusion for reducing pain on injection of propofol: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adult Japanese surgical patients. Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.012.
PMID: 19922881BACKGROUNDAlipour M, Tabari M, Alipour M. Paracetamol, ondansetron, granisetron, magnesium sulfate and lidocaine and reduced propofol injection pain. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Mar;16(3):e16086. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.16086. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
PMID: 24829787BACKGROUNDRahimzadeh P, Faiz SH, Nikoobakht N, Ghodrati MR. Which one is more efficient on propofol 2% injection pain? Magnesium sulfate or ondansetron: A randomized clinical trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2015 Feb 17;4:56. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.151593. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25802825BACKGROUNDBorazan H, Sahin O, Kececioglu A, Uluer MS, Et T, Otelcioglu S. Prevention of propofol injection pain in children: a comparison of pretreatment with tramadol and propofol-lidocaine mixture. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(6):492-7. doi: 10.7150/ijms.4793. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
PMID: 22927775BACKGROUNDCanbay O, Celebi N, Arun O, Karagoz AH, Saricaoglu F, Ozgen S. Efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen and lidocaine on propofol injection pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):95-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem301. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
PMID: 17959585BACKGROUNDAhmad S, De Oliveira GS Jr, Fitzgerald PC, McCarthy RJ. The effect of intravenous dexamethasone and lidocaine on propofol-induced vascular pain: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Pain Res Treat. 2013;2013:734531. doi: 10.1155/2013/734531. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
PMID: 23956857BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdul Sattar Narejo, FCPS, FCAI
King Khalid University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The whole arm with the intravenous catheter was covered with a green sheet, from where the mixture of propofol-lidocaine was given.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Anesthetist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2016
First Posted
December 17, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share