Under Water Seal Versus Negative Pleural Suction in Chest Trauma Patients
Chest Tube Drainage With Under Water Seal Versus Addition Of Negative Pleural Suction In Chest Trauma Patients
1 other identifier
observational
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
:The investigators aim to provide trauma patient with the best and most efficient managment options and long-term stability with the least complications by comparing the effect of under water seal alone of chest tube in one groups of trauma patients and the effect of both under water seal and suction in other group and the benefits of one versus the other in duration of hospital stay and to assess short-term post-traumatic complications ,also to assess effectiveness of adding suction and patient satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2021
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 4, 2021
March 1, 2021
1.7 years
October 18, 2020
March 3, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decrease duration of hospital stay.
We can measure this by: Amount and duration of airleak in chest tube.
baseline
Interventions
by comparing the effect of water seal alone of chest tube in one groups of trauma patients and the effect of both water seal and suction in other group
Eligibility Criteria
: patients who presented to Trauma Department, Assiut University Hospital and who meet the listed inclusion will be eligible for the study. The charts will be reviewed and eligible patients will be filtered.
You may qualify if:
- 1-Pneumothorax after penetrating or blunt chest trauma
- Hemothorax after penetrating or blunt chest trauma
- Hemopneumothorax after penetrating or blunt chest trauma 4-All patients of all ages and genders are included
You may not qualify if:
- Anyperson associating with body trauma outside chest.
- Invasive mechanical ventilation
- Emergent Surgery (thoracoscopy, open thoracotomy)
- Chronic pulmonary diseases (COPD, CRPD)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Muslim M, Bilal A, Salim M, Khan MA, Baseer A, Ahmed M. Tube thorocostomy: management and outcome in patients with penetrating chest trauma. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):108-11.
PMID: 19999219BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chest Tube Drainage With Under Water Seal Versus Addition Of Negative Pleural Suction In Chest Trauma Patients
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2020
First Posted
December 17, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
November 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 4, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Overall Goal: We aim to provide trauma patient with the best and most efficient managment options and long-term stability with the least complications by comparing the effect of water seal alone of chest tube in one groups of trauma patients and the effect of both water seal and suction in other group and the benefits of one versus the other in duration of hospital stay and to assess short-term post-traumatic complications ,also to assess effectiveness of adding suction and patient satisfaction.