Contrast Ultrasound Dispersion Imaging (CUDI) as a Diagnostic Modality in the Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma

NCT04669613 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: CUDI-RCC
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 10
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Introduction The current limitations of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) imaging form a major deficit in the diagnostic pathway. Contrast Enhanced UltraSound (CEUS) has the potential to improve RCC detection and localization significantly. CEUS image interpretation is however difficult and subjective. To overcome these difficulties a CEUS quantification technique, Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Dispersion Imaging (CUDI), has been developed in cooperation with the Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e). Study objective Primary objective: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of CUDI for recognizing malignant tissue in vivo. Study population All patients scheduled for a partial or radial nephrectomy in the Amsterdam UMC (Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra) Study Procedure This study is a prospective in-vivo study in patients scheduled for a partial or radical nephrectomy for a suspicious RCC in which we will perform CEUS imaging. The (partial) nephrectomy is part of standard care for patients with a suspicious lesion in the kidney. The additional ultrasound with infusion of an ultrasound contrast agent during ultrasound scanning is performed for the purpose of the study. CEUS imaging will be performed right before (partial) nephrectomy, with the patient being under general anesthesia. The CEUS and CUDI parametric maps will be interpreted by Investigator A in a blinded fashion with suspicious lesions each delineated. The (partial) nephrectomy will be performed by a qualified urologist, and the analysis of the histological specimens will be performed by a qualified pathologist. Sensitivity and specificity for CUDI will be calculated for all patients receiving a (partial) nephrectomy in which the tissue is sent for pathology. Benefits Currently, most renal tumors are diagnosed by abdominal US, CT or MRI. Renal tumors are classified as cystic or solid lesions on imaging. The most important criteria for differentiating malignant lesions is the presence of enhancement after administration of contrast for CT or MRI in several different phases (4 phases CT-scan). Enhancement in renal masses is determined by comparing Hounsfield units before and after administration of contrast. A change of 15 or more Hounsfield units demonstrates enhancement. Specificity and sensitivity for detecting RCC are around 75% and 88% for CT, and around 89% and 87.5% for MRI, respectively. Both CT and MRI can objectify a contrast-enhancing mass, suspicious for RCC, however, they cannot reliably distinguish a benign lesion (such as an oncocytoma or angiomyolipoma) from a malignant renal neoplasm. For that reason, patients are currently undergoing an RTB (renal tumor biopsy) to objectify pathology for deciding if treatment is necessary or not. Recent literature suggests up to 30% benign pathology after partial nephrectomy implicating overtreatment. RTB has been gradually introduced and increasingly used, however, an RTB is not without risks. Bleeding is the most documented complication. Recently even tumor tract seeding has been under discussion. Improving imaging by using CUDI for differentiating benign from malignant lesions instead of performing an RTB could prevent those risks for patients. Risk assessment There is a small risk of contrast-related adverse events (AE) for participants. After use in millions of patients, AE to the ultrasound contrast agent appear to be transient, mild and rare, and mostly consist of transient alteration of taste, local pain at the injection site and facial or general flush. In some cases, a mild allergic reaction is described. Patients will be informed of the risk during contrast exposure, and it will be described in the patient information file.

Conditions

Kidney Cancer

Keywords

Ultrasound; CEUS; CUDI; Contrast enhanced ultrasound; Contrast ultrasound dispersion imaging; Kidney cancer; renal cancer; carcinoma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

• per-patient RCC detection rates

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• Rate of malignant histology that can be correlated to CUDI-parameters

  After receiving both the CUDI-data and the histology data, both will be compared to check if the regions that show different CUDI-parameters match the regions with malignancy in histology

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• Wash out time as a parameter to measure the dispersion of the micro bubbles of the CUDI contrast agent

  This is a physical parameter that is quantified from CEUS-data by CUDI. The wash out time is the time that it takes for the micro bubbles to disappear.

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

• sensitivity of CUDI

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• specificity of CUDI

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• negative predictive value of CUDI

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• positive predictive value of CUDI

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (1)

Patients

EXPERIMENTAL

Other: CUDI

Interventions

CUDI OTHER

Analysis of the CEUS data by means of Contrast ultrasound dispersion imaging

Also known as: Contrast ultrasound dispersion imaging

Patients

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• age ≥ 18 years
• signed informed consent
• scheduled for a radical- or partial nephrectomy for the suspicious of a renal tumor.

You may not qualify if:

• Earlier treatment of renal masses
• History of any clinically evidence of cardiac right-to-left shunts
• Severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure \>90 mmHg) or uncontrolled systemic hypertension or respiratory distress syndrome
• Has any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study
• Is incapable of understanding the language in which the information for the patient is given
• Tumor cannot be visualized/localized on ultrasound imaging
• Previous hypersensitivity allergic reactions
• Known allergy of macrogol 4000, distearoylphosphatidylcholine, dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol Sodium, Palmitic acid
• Use of dobutamine or conditions suggesting cardiovascular instability where dobutamine is contraindicated.
• Pregnant or breastfeeding

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA): lead

Study Sites (1)

Amsterdam UMC

Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105AZ, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (6)

• Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Lam T, Marconi L, Merseburger AS, Mulders P, Powles T, Staehler M, Volpe A, Bex A. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

  PMID: 25616710 RESULT

• Israel GM, Bosniak MA. Pitfalls in renal mass evaluation and how to avoid them. Radiographics. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):1325-38. doi: 10.1148/rg.285075744.

  PMID: 18794310 RESULT

• Vogel C, Ziegelmuller B, Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Bex A, Canfield S, Giles RH, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Powles T, Albiges L, Stewart F, Volpe A, Graser A, Schlemmer M, Yuan C, Lam T, Staehler M. Imaging in Suspected Renal-Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Apr;17(2):e345-e355. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Aug 11.

  PMID: 30528378 RESULT

• Fernando A, Fowler S, O'Brien T; British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS). Nephron-sparing surgery across a nation - outcomes from the British Association of Urological Surgeons 2012 national partial nephrectomy audit. BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):874-82. doi: 10.1111/bju.13353. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

  PMID: 26469291 RESULT

• Marconi L, Dabestani S, Lam TB, Hofmann F, Stewart F, Norrie J, Bex A, Bensalah K, Canfield SE, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Mulders PFA, Powles T, Staehler M, Ljungberg B, Volpe A. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Renal Tumour Biopsy. Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):660-673. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.072. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

  PMID: 26323946 RESULT

• Macklin PS, Sullivan ME, Tapping CR, Cranston DW, Webster GM, Roberts ISD, Verrill CL, Browning L. Tumour Seeding in the Tract of Percutaneous Renal Tumour Biopsy: A Report on Seven Cases from a UK Tertiary Referral Centre. Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):861-867. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 24.

  PMID: 30591353 RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Neoplasms; Carcinoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic Neoplasms; Urogenital Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Female Urogenital Diseases; Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications; Urogenital Diseases; Kidney Diseases; Urologic Diseases; Male Urogenital Diseases; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NA
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
• Intervention Model: SINGLE GROUP
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 21, 2020
• First Posted: December 17, 2020
• Study Start: December 30, 2020
• Primary Completion: January 1, 2021
• Study Completion: April 1, 2021
• Last Updated: December 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

NL (1)