Axis Length and Its Relationship With Refractive Error in Chinese University Students
Shanghai Guanghua Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
1 other identifier
observational
1,901
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To investigate the relationship between axis length (AL) and refractive error. eyes of low hyperopia to emmetropia subjects, comprising eyes with moderate to high myopia (-11.00D ≤ SE ≤ -4.00D) were analyzed in this cross-sectional study. Cycloplegic refractive error was measured with the autorefractor, AL was measured with the IOL master. Association between AL and refractive error were evaluated by linear regression analysis. The mean of AL and its correlation with SE, sex, and age were evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2020
CompletedDecember 14, 2020
December 1, 2020
6 months
November 2, 2020
December 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Axis length
Axis length change from baseline at 6 months
from baseline at 6 months
Refractive Error
Refractive Error change from baseline at 6 months
from baseline at 6 months
Study Arms (2)
axis length
1007 healthy students with moderate to high myopia (SE ≤ -4.00D) and 894 without myopia (-0.50D ≤ spherical power ≤ +2.00D) were enrolled.
gender
male were 54.29% (N=1032), and female were 45.71% (N=869)
Interventions
visual acuity, IOL master biometry, the anterior segment with slit lamp, dilated fundus examination and refraction.
Eligibility Criteria
The subject recruited for the study were 1935 students
You may qualify if:
- with moderate to high myopia (SE ≤ -4.00D) without myopia (-0.50D ≤ spherical power ≤ +2.00D) no concurrent eye disease best corrected visual acuity is 1.0
You may not qualify if:
- significant systemic illnesses congenital myopia, media opacity uveitis glaucoma intraocular surgery refractive surgery neurologic diseases retinal disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wang Hongxialead
- Tianjin Eye Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Guanghua Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200052, China
Related Publications (16)
Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):1036-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
PMID: 26875007RESULTKempen JH, Mitchell P, Lee KE, Tielsch JM, Broman AT, Taylor HR, Ikram MK, Congdon NG, O'Colmain BJ; Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):495-505. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.495.
PMID: 15078666RESULTMorgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012 May 5;379(9827):1739-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4.
PMID: 22559900RESULTMountjoy E, Davies NM, Plotnikov D, Smith GD, Rodriguez S, Williams CE, Guggenheim JA, Atan D. Education and myopia: assessing the direction of causality by mendelian randomisation. BMJ. 2018 Jun 6;361:k2022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2022.
PMID: 29875094RESULTDolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature. 2015 Mar 19;519(7543):276-8. doi: 10.1038/519276a. No abstract available.
PMID: 25788077RESULTSpillmann L. Stopping the rise of myopia in Asia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 May;258(5):943-959. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04555-0. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
PMID: 31873785RESULTBattersby K, Koy L, Phillips N, Sim J, Wilk J, Schmid KL. Analysis of physical activity in emmetropic and myopic university students during semester and holiday periods: a pilot study. Clin Exp Optom. 2015 Nov;98(6):547-54. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12327.
PMID: 26769178RESULTTideman JWL, Polling JR, Jaddoe VWV, Vingerling JR, Klaver CCW. Growth in foetal life, infancy, and early childhood and the association with ocular biometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 Jul;39(4):245-252. doi: 10.1111/opo.12630.
PMID: 31236981RESULTJonas JB, Ohno-Matsui K, Panda-Jonas S. Myopia: Anatomic Changes and Consequences for Its Etiology. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019 Sep-Oct;8(5):355-359. doi: 10.1097/01.APO.0000578944.25956.8b.
PMID: 31425168RESULTOhno-Matsui K, Lai TY, Lai CC, Cheung CM. Updates of pathologic myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016 May;52:156-87. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
PMID: 26769165RESULTPaluru P, Ronan SM, Heon E, Devoto M, Wildenberg SC, Scavello G, Holleschau A, Makitie O, Cole WG, King RA, Young TL. New locus for autosomal dominant high myopia maps to the long arm of chromosome 17. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 May;44(5):1830-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0697.
PMID: 12714612RESULTWang J, Ying GS, Fu X, Zhang R, Meng J, Gu F, Li J. Prevalence of myopia and vision impairment in school students in Eastern China. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 2;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1281-0.
PMID: 31898504RESULTRichter GM, Wang M, Jiang X, Wu S, Wang D, Torres M, Choudhury F, Varma R; Chinese American Eye Study Group. Ocular Determinants of Refractive Error and Its Age- and Sex-Related Variations in the Chinese American Eye Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 1;135(7):724-732. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1176.
PMID: 28520882RESULTRozema JJ, Sun W, Wu JF, Jiang WJ, Wu H, Lu TL, Hu YY, Chen R, Guo DD, Wang XR, Dankert S, Jonas JB, Iribarren R, Tian QM, Bi HS. Differences in ocular biometry between urban and rural children matched by refractive error: the Shandong Children Eye Study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 Nov;39(6):451-458. doi: 10.1111/opo.12649.
PMID: 31696541RESULTMallen EA, Gammoh Y, Al-Bdour M, Sayegh FN. Refractive error and ocular biometry in Jordanian adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 Jul;25(4):302-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00306.x.
PMID: 15953114RESULTZadnik K, Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Burr D, Moeschberger ML. Normal eye growth in emmetropic schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Nov;81(11):819-28. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000145028.53923.67.
PMID: 15545807RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hongxia Wang, director
Shanghai Guanghua integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Shanghai Guanghua Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2020
First Posted
December 14, 2020
Study Start
January 21, 2019
Primary Completion
July 30, 2019
Study Completion
August 11, 2019
Last Updated
December 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share