Personalised Against Standard High Tibial Osteotomy
PASHiOn
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
7
Brief Summary
A study to compare the accuracy of achieving the planned correction between personalised (TOKA) high tibial osteotomy (HTO) procedure and standard generic HTO procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 8, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2025
CompletedApril 30, 2026
April 1, 2026
3.2 years
November 26, 2020
April 29, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Phase 1 - To assess the safety of the TOKA device by determining the incidence/rate of Adverse Events, Adverse Device Effects, Serious Adverse Device Effects, Serious Adverse Events, Unexpected Serious Adverse Device Effects and complications.
Incidence/rate of safety events - Adverse Events (AE), Adverse Device Effects (ADE), Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Unexpected Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs) and complications.
6 weeks post-surgery
Phase 2 - To establish if digitally planned personalised HTO surgery (TOKA) increases the accuracy of bone correction in comparison to conventional HTO surgery.
The absolute difference between planned and achieved coronal plane correction in terms of the hip-knee-ankle angle, (as measured from full length weight bearing x-rays)
9 months post-randomisation (6 months post-surgery)
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Number of patients (%) achieving a pre-specified difference between planned and achieved coronal plane correction
9 months post-randomisation (6 months post-surgery)
Change in coronal plane location of peak loading during gait, in comparison to baseline, measured by Video Vector
9 months post-randomisation (6 months post-surgery)
Operative time in minutes
At procedure
Patient reported outcomes - Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-surgery
Patient reported outcomes - EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol, 5 Dimension, 5 Levels)
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-surgery
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Personalised (TOKA)
EXPERIMENTALDuring HTO surgery, the personalised plate will be inserted below the knee. The investigational device and comparator are two types of metal plate used to fix the bone in place during a high tibial osteotomy (HTO).
Standard (Tomofix or ActivMotion)
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring HTO surgery, the standard plate will be inserted below the knee.
Interventions
The device is a digitally planned (using individual CT scan measured anatomic data) personalised opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) procedure using a custom 3D printed surgical guide and plate.
The comparators, Tomofix and ActivMotion, are the most widely used devices for HTO procedures in the UK. Surgical procedures using the Tomofix and ActiveMotion are similar to TOKA, however, they are not patient specific and do not use custom-made plates.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing High Tibial Osteotomy
- Male or Female, aged 18 to 65 years
- Primary diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease (NIDJD)
- Predominately diagnosed with unicompartmental medial osteoarthritis of the knee with the normal clinically acceptable level of other compartmental involvement
- Varus deformity \<20 °
- BMI ≤ 35. An exemption to this may be made if the participant (in the investigators opinion) is suitable for surgery.
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
- Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Female participants who are pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study.
- Prisoners
- Participants with a known deep tissue sensitivity to device materials
- Participants with an active or suspected latent infection in or about the affected knee joint
- Participants who have received any orthopaedic surgical intervention to the lower extremities (excluding investigative surgery) within the past 12 months, or is expected to require any orthopaedic surgical intervention to the lower extremities, other than the HTO to be enrolled in this study, within the next 12 months (including intra-articular procedures).
- Participants who require bilateral HTO with surgery planned on their second knee within 6 months of their first operation (bilateral HTO patients are otherwise included).
- Participants who require bilateral HTO who have had a previous unsuccessful contralateral partial replacement or HTO
- Chronic heart failure (NYHA Stage ≥ 2)
- Neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which limits the ability to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device
- Systemic disease diagnosis (e.g. Lupus Erythematosus) or a metabolic disorder (e.g. Paget's disease) leading to progressive bone deterioration.
- Participant is immunologically suppressed or receiving steroids in excess of normal physiological requirements (e.g. \> 30 days).
- Participant is a smoker.
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Bathlead
- University of Oxfordcollaborator
- 3D Metal Printing Ltdcollaborator
- Versus Arthritiscollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Royal United Hospitals NHS Trust
Bath, Avon, BA1 3NG, United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7HE, United Kingdom
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital
Birmingham, West Midlands, B31 2AP, United Kingdom
Walsall Manor Hospital
Walsall, West Midlands, WS2 9PS, United Kingdom
Great Western Hospital
Swindon, Wiltshire, SN3 6BB, United Kingdom
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
Exeter, United Kingdom
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richie Gill, Prof
University of Bath
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Healthcare Engineering
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2020
First Posted
December 14, 2020
Study Start
September 8, 2021
Primary Completion
December 6, 2024
Study Completion
July 10, 2025
Last Updated
April 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share