Study Stopped
Drop out from surgeons from 3 to 1. It will take too long to feasibly accrue with only one provider.
Regional Erector Spinae Analgesic Block vs Standard of Care Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Randomized, Prospective Trial of Regional Erector Spinae Analgesic Block Versus Standard of Care in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if adding a spinal block (medicine that will numb parts of the body to block pain) along with standard pain control at the incision site will decrease the need for narcotics for pain management and decrease the percentage of patients requiring hospital admission for pain control during postoperative , in-hospital, care after a percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (surgery to remove kidney stones), commonly called PERC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2020
CompletedApril 23, 2021
April 1, 2021
7 months
November 20, 2020
April 21, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overnight Admission Rate
Percentage of patients in Groups 1 and 2 who require overnight admission to the hospital for pain control postoperatively (i.e. patients unable to be discharged to home from the postoperative anesthesia care unit PACU).
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Narcotic for Analgesia post-operatively
14 days post-op
Proportion of patients with Emergency Department return or re-admission
14 days
Number of Narcotic administrations post-operatively
14 days
Number of Morphine Equivalents post-operatively
14 days
Number of complications peri and post-operatively
24 hours
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
OTHERStandard Care Protocol - peritubal block standard local analgesic administration in the form of a peritubal block
ANES Block
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to the erector spinae block (Group 2) will have the block placed in the preoperative area by the anesthesia team. 0-4 mg midazolam and/or 0-100 mcg of fentanyl may be provided prior to and in order to place the block itself. The local anesthetic will diffuse to involve the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerves, achieving a sensory block of the affected area. The erector spinae block analgesic will be administered by the anesthesia team. The analgesic provided in the erector spinae block is 20mL of 0.5% Bupivicaine with 4mg of PF Dexamethasone.
Interventions
analgesic provided in the erector spinae block is 20mL of 0.5% Bupivicaine with 4mg of PF Dexamethasone
Peritubal block - standard local analgesic administration
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years Undergoing unilateral or bilateral PCNL for treatment of kidney stones Estimated glomerular filtration rate \> 30 mL/min. PCNL is planned as an outpatient procedure with no overnight hospital stay
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide informed consent Pregnancy Patients having any additional simultaneous procedures other than a contralateral PCNL,(including contralateral treatment of kidney stones with a non-PCNL operation such as ureteroscopy) Patients with a documented neurologic injury that reduces pain sensation to the back Patients with an existing pain disorder Patients with an existing narcotics agreement due to current or prior narcotic abuse Patients with a documented allergy to a narcotic or NSAID analgesic BMI \> 35 Patients who require more than 1 site of percutaneous access into the kidney to adequately complete the PCNL (this is a judgment made preoperatively at the initial clinic patient encounter)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Methodist University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Related Publications (12)
Jonnavithula N, Pisapati MV, Durga P, Krishnamurthy V, Chilumu R, Reddy B. Efficacy of peritubal local anesthetic infiltration in alleviating postoperative pain in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009 May;23(5):857-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0634.
PMID: 19397429BACKGROUNDParikh GP, Shah VR, Modi MP, Chauhan NC. The analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of 0.25% bupivacaine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - A prospective randomized study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;27(4):481-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.86591.
PMID: 22096280BACKGROUNDOzkan D, Akkaya T, Karakoyunlu N, Arik E, Ergil J, Koc Z, Gumus H, Ersoy H. Effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block on postoperative pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy : prospective randomized controlled study. Anaesthesist. 2013 Dec;62(12):988-94. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2253-z. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
PMID: 24173546BACKGROUNDHoney RJ, Ghiculete D, Ray AA, Pace KT. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intercostal nerve block after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2013 Apr;27(4):415-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0418.
PMID: 23445266BACKGROUNDYang H, Yu X, Hu J, Peng E, Li C, Cui L, Zhao C, Wang S, Wei C, Mei W, Wang S, Ye Z. Usage of Multilevel Paravertebral Block as the Main Anesthesia for Mini-Invasive PCNL: Retrospective Review of 45 Cases with Large Stones. Urol Int. 2017;99(3):326-330. doi: 10.1159/000480094. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
PMID: 28850954BACKGROUNDJonnavithula N, Chirra RR, Pasupuleti SL, Devraj R, Sriramoju V, Pisapati MV. A comparison of the efficacy of intercostal nerve block and peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine for post-operative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomised double-blind study. Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Aug;61(8):655-660. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_88_17.
PMID: 28890561BACKGROUNDHatipoglu Z, Gulec E, Turktan M, Izol V, Aridogan A, Gunes Y, Ozcengiz D. Comparative study of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block versus intravenous tramadol for postoperative pain control in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0479-7.
PMID: 29454333BACKGROUNDMalekpour M, Hashmi A, Dove J, Torres D, Wild J. Analgesic Choice in Management of Rib Fractures: Paravertebral Block or Epidural Analgesia? Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):1906-1911. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002113.
PMID: 28525509BACKGROUNDYeying G, Liyong Y, Yuebo C, Yu Z, Guangao Y, Weihu M, Liujun Z. Thoracic paravertebral block versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures. J Int Med Res. 2017 Dec;45(6):2085-2091. doi: 10.1177/0300060517710068. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
PMID: 28635359BACKGROUNDDindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
PMID: 15273542BACKGROUNDHarris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
PMID: 18929686BACKGROUNDMiller NL, Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE. Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access. J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.014. Epub 2007 May 11.
PMID: 17574053BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tim Large, MD
Indiana University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Anesthesia will know the randomization assignment. The surgeon and the patient will be blinded to randomization.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Urology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2020
First Posted
December 10, 2020
Study Start
February 24, 2020
Primary Completion
September 11, 2020
Study Completion
September 24, 2020
Last Updated
April 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share