Advantages of 3D Printing in the Management of Acetabular Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
109
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Acetabular fractures result from violent trauma, and their incidence has been increasing in recent years. The Kocher-Langenbeck surgical approach is used for the internal fixation of displaced fractures of the posterior structures of the acetabulum. The quality of the reduction and the stability of osteosynthesis directly influence the function of the repaired acetabulum. In the surgical management of acetabulum fractures, 3D printing of a bone model is increasingly used during preoperative planning by trauma surgeons worldwide. Questions: Is there a difference in the surgical time of the Kocher-langenbeck reduction and fixation of the posterior structures of the acetabulum between 3D printing (which allows for shaping of the reconstruction plate prior to surgery) and the conventional technique? Are there any differences in complications between the two techniques? Are there any short-term differences in the functional and radiographic scores between 3D printing and the conventional technique? Methods: 109 consecutive patients who sustained fractures of the acetabulum were screened for inclusion. 43 patient were studied. The first group (G1) consisted of 20 patients who underwent prior molding of the osteosynthesis plate on a 3D-printed model. The second group (G2 or control group) included 23 patients who underwent surgery using the conventional technique. We compared surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, the difference between pre- and postoperative hemoglobin, and the onset of early infection, paralysis of the sciatic nerve, and deep vein thrombosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2020
CompletedDecember 9, 2020
November 1, 2020
2.5 years
November 11, 2020
December 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Quality of fracture reduction
CT scan displacement of fracture as one of three: * Anatomical (residual displacement \<1 mm) * Imperfect (residual displacement 1 to 3 mm) * Poor (residual reduction \>3 mm)
30 months with minimum of 18 months
radiographic criteria
Matta scoring system a grade of : * Excellent :indicates a normal appearance of the hip; * Good: mild changes, small osteophytes, moderate (one-millimeter) narrowing of the joint, and minimum sclerosis; a grade of * Fair:intermediate changes, moderate osteophytes, moderate (less than 50 per cent) narrowing of the joint, and moderate sclerosis; and a grade of * Poor: advanced changes, large osteophytes, severe (more than 50 per cent) narrowing of the joint, collapse or wear of the femoral head, and acetabular wear.
30 months with minimum of 18 months
Clinical score
Modified Harris Hip Score includes the pain and function components: The maximum score of 91 is multiplied by 1.1 to give a total score out of 100 Modified Hip Harris score * Excellent: 90-100 * Good: 80-90 * Fair 70-80 * Poor: \<70
30 months with minimum of 18 months
Study Arms (2)
3D printing group
EXPERIMENTALGroup 1 (G1) consisted of 20 patients who underwent preoperative molding of the osteosynthesis plate on a 3D printed model of the pelvis. A preoperative scan of the healthy hemi-pelvis was used to create the 3D-printed model for patients in G1 according to the following three-step methodology: 1) A scanographic acquisition of images was performed using a multi-strip scanner in thin sections. These images were recorded as digital images in the standard medical format of digital imaging and communications ; 2) A digital, 3D model of the pelvis in the stereolithography format was created to digitally treat the 2D images. The individualization of the healthy hemi-pelvis, to which a "mirror effect" was applied allowed for the creation of a symmetrical 3D image, as hemi-pelvises are globally symmetrical. 3) A 3D printer was used to create a physical, 3D-printed model of the affected hemi-pelvis using polylactic acid.
conventional technique group
EXPERIMENTALGroup 2 (G2 or control group) included 23 patients who underwent surgery using the conventional technique.The patients in the control group (G2) underwent surgery following the conventional procedure based on radiographic and CT images with 3D reconstructions.
Interventions
Fracture fixation of posterior structures of acetabulum by using the surgical procedure of Kocher-Langenbeck approach
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Fractures of the posterior structures of the acetabulum
- treatment using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach.
You may not qualify if:
- age over than 60 years
- treatment approach other than the Kocher-Langenbeck's ( eg orthopedic method)
- open fractures of the pelvis
- fractures of the acetabulum older than 3-weeks
- polytrauma with/or multiple fractures.
- unavailability for follow-up
- insufficient clinical and radiographic data.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Wang P, Kandemir U, Zhang B, Fei C, Zhuang Y, Zhang K. The effect of new preoperative preparation method compared to conventional method in complex acetabular fractures: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Feb;141(2):215-222. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03472-w. Epub 2020 May 26.
PMID: 32458075BACKGROUNDHsu CL, Chou YC, Li YT, Chen JE, Hung CC, Wu CC, Shen HC, Yeh TT. Pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing techniques for the surgical management of acetabular fractures. Int Orthop. 2019 Aug;43(8):1969-1976. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4111-8. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
PMID: 30128670RESULTBouabdellah M, Bensalah M, Kamoun C, Bellil M, Kooli M, Hadhri K. Advantages of three-dimensional printing in the management of acetabular fracture fixed by the Kocher-Langenbeck approach: randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2022 May;46(5):1155-1163. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05319-y. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
PMID: 35103815DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mondher Kooli, PhD
Orthopedic and traumatologic department of Charles Nicolle Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Clinical and radiographic results at the last follow-up were evaluated by one surgeon who did not participate in the surgical management of the patients
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2020
First Posted
December 9, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 28, 2019
Study Completion
February 28, 2019
Last Updated
December 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No: There is not a plan to make IPD available.