NCT04660149

Brief Summary

This study seeks to explore between 6-7 patient participants' (18-50 years old inclusive) own expectations and hopes leading up to a THA, then to examine their own views on their recovery and rehabilitation post-operatively. A qualitative, longitudinal approach will be utilised for this research with a generic qualitative method analysing the verbal data taken during interviews with participants. A combination of semi-structured and narrative interview techniques will investigate the patients' individual expected outcomes and priorities for their recovery. The study approach seeks to explore the patients' own views of a successful outcome of THA, it hopes to discover any potential themes of needs and priorities in the younger patient, and compare these to the standard way of measuring these outcomes by using PROMS. The outcome will contribute to determining what more can be done to improve the care currently in place for this increasing group of patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 2, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 11, 2021

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 27, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 27, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 18, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 2, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 17, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Are the priorities of the younger patient (< 50) being addressed and fulfilled when undergoing a THR?

    The priorities and goals of the participant will be explored through the study interviews, these findings will be compared with the outcomes recorded when caring for these patients.

    12-18 months

  • Are the current Outcome Measures identifying the priorities and required outcomes of the younger patient (< 50) undergoing a THR?

    The data recorded in the interview will be compared with the Patient Reported Outcome Measures reported at the same time, to compare the two findings.

    12-18 months

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients attending Milton Keynes University Hospital and scheduled to undergo a Primary Total hip replacement

You may qualify if:

  • Patients 18-50 years of age inclusive.
  • Scheduled to undergo a primary THR in the index hip in the next 12-18 months. (Patients will still be eligible despite previously having a THR in the opposing hip)
  • Able to provide informed consent.
  • Ability to understand and communicate in English.

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Over 50 years of age
  • Undergoing a revision of THR in the index hip.
  • Unable to provide informed consent or participate in study interviews.
  • Unable or unwilling to complete follow up interviews.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Milton Keynes University Hospital

Milton Keynes, MK6 5LD, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Larsson A, Rolfson O, Karrholm J. Evaluation of Forgotten Joint Score in total hip arthroplasty with Oxford Hip Score as reference standard. Acta Orthop. 2019 Jun;90(3):253-257. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1599252. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

    PMID: 30931686BACKGROUND
  • Mannion AF, Kampfen S, Munzinger U, Kramers-de Quervain I. The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):R139. doi: 10.1186/ar2811. Epub 2009 Sep 21.

    PMID: 19772556BACKGROUND
  • Wright JG, Young NL. The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jul;79(7):974-83. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199707000-00003.

    PMID: 9234873BACKGROUND
  • Wright JG, Young NL, Waddell JP. The reliability and validity of the self-reported patient-specific index for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jun;82(6):829-37. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200006000-00009.

    PMID: 10859102BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Louise Mew

    Research Nurse

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2020

First Posted

December 9, 2020

Study Start

April 11, 2021

Primary Completion

April 27, 2023

Study Completion

April 27, 2023

Last Updated

July 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No identifiable patient information is to be shared with any other researcher

Locations