Child Discomfort and Parental Acceptability of Silver Diamine Fluoride and Alternative Restorative Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the current study was to compare pain perception of young children treated with SDF and ART, as well as their parents' acceptability of both modalities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 12, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2020
CompletedDecember 4, 2020
November 1, 2020
12 months
November 27, 2020
November 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain perception
Pain reaction was assessed using the Sound, Eye, Motor scale (SEM) according to Wright et al. criteria. It is an objective method for pain assessment, where the child's level of anxiety was evaluated according to three types of observations. The score in each category ranged from one (no pain) to four (intense pain). A lower score represents less physical reaction to the procedure than does a higher value. Time of treatment was recorded using a stopwatch.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Parents' acceptability of the treatment modality
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Silver Diamine Fluoride
EXPERIMENTALAtraumatic Restorative Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Steps of SDF 38% application were carried out following the manufacturer's instructions. Eligible primary carious teeth were first dried and isolated using cotton rolls and gauze. Adjacent soft tissues were isolated using petrolleum gelly in order to prevent any irritation or staining from SDF that was directly placed into the carious lesion using a microbrush, allowed to absorb for 2 minutes, then dried with air. Parents were instructed that children should not eat for one hour after treatment. The second application was done after 6 months.
Steps of ART caries removal were carried out following the Frencken et al. criteria where the cavity opening was widened using the tip of a dental hatchet. The carious dentin was then removed using a spoon excavator starting at the enamel-dentin junction, unsupported enamel was removed using the hatchet, and finally the cavity was cleaned using a wet cotton pellet and dried. After complete removal of infected dentin, the cavity walls and floor were conditioned for 10 seconds, washed and dried with cotton pellets, then restored with chemically cured glass ionomer cement that was applied under finger pressure, then coated with petroleum jelly.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Negative and definitely negative behavior according to Frankl's behavior rating scale.
- Having at least one deciduous asymptomatic tooth with active caries, as defined by the International Caries Detection and Assessment System; ICDAS II scores 4, 5, 6.
You may not qualify if:
- Children who suffered from silver allergy, oral ulcerations, pulpal infections and whose parents needed immediate permanent restorations.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Nourhan M.Alylead
- Alexandria Universitycollaborator
- Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
Related Publications (2)
Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O. The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Pediatr Dent. 1991 Sep-Oct;13(5):278-83.
PMID: 1815200BACKGROUNDIsmail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):170-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x.
PMID: 17518963BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amel M Ahmed, Phd
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt and College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- STUDY CHAIR
Hoda M Abdellatif, PhD
College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and College of Dentistry Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
- STUDY CHAIR
Sarah I Baghdady, M.Sc
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wafaa E Abdelaziz, PhD
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mona A ElKateb, PhD
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt and College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Lecturer of Dental Public Health
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2020
First Posted
December 4, 2020
Study Start
October 12, 2018
Primary Completion
October 1, 2019
Study Completion
October 30, 2019
Last Updated
December 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11