NCT04649463

Brief Summary

Background: Office blood pressure (OBP) is used for diagnosing and treating hypertension but ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) associates more accurately with patient outcome. The optimal blood pressure in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is still unknown. Our objective was to investigate whether physician awareness of ABP after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improved BP-control. Methods: A total of 201 patients performed ABPM before and after their PCI follow-up visit. Patients were randomized to open (O) or concealed (C) ABPM results for the physician at the follow-up visit. The change in ABP and antihypertensive medication in relation to baseline ABP was compared between the two groups.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 6, 2009

Completed
6.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 20, 2015

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 15, 2016

Completed
4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 21, 2020

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 2, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 2, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6.1 years

First QC Date

November 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 24, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary efficacy variable was the difference between groups in change of mean night time blood pressure between the first and second ABPM.

    Change in mean systolic blood pressure as assessed by ABPM between 24.00 to 6.00 between groups (open or concealed 24-hour ABPM).

    Change in mean nighttime ABPM between first to second ABPM ( First 3-6 weeks after PCI and second 11-18 weeks after PCI)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Frequency of patients with 24-hour hypertensionl at 11-18 weeks after PCI

    11-18 weeks after PCI

Study Arms (2)

Open ABPM results

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

ABPM results were used in the decision making for adjustments in antihypertensive medication at follow up visit.

Diagnostic Test: Open ABPM results

Concealed ABPM results

SHAM COMPARATOR

ABPM results were not used in the decision making for adjustments in antihypertensive medication at follow up visit.

Diagnostic Test: Open ABPM results

Interventions

Open ABPM resultsDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

ABPM results were used in the decision making for adjustments in antihypertensive medication at follow up visit.

Concealed ABPM resultsOpen ABPM results

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \* Patient scheduled for follow up after an acute or elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary atherosclerosis at the Department of Cardiology at the Karolinska University Hospital

You may not qualify if:

  • Age below 18 years
  • Age above 90 years
  • Severe cognitive dysfunction
  • Severe somatic disease constituting an obstacle for completing follow up
  • Current atrial fibrillation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery DiseaseHypertension

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Jan B Östergren, MD. PhD

    Karolinska Institutet

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized parallell groups open
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2020

First Posted

December 2, 2020

Study Start

April 6, 2009

Primary Completion

May 20, 2015

Study Completion

November 15, 2016

Last Updated

December 2, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

We have no objection to share data if the integrity of the individual data can be protected

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
In 2021 until 2025
Access Criteria
Researcher with an academic affiliation