NCT04647877

Brief Summary

Objectives: The main objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of phenytoin cream in patients with neuropathic pain due to chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP). The second objective is to determine the predictive value of a double-blind placebo-controlled response test (DOBRET) to identify sustained responders. Study design: This is a 6-week enrichment randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial evaluating phenytoin cream in 84 participants with painful CIAP, whereafter an open label extension phase is offered with phenytoin 20 percent cream for up to one year. At baseline a DOBRET with phenytoin 10 percent and placebo cream will be performed in each study participant to stratify participants according to their response to the DOBRET before entering the double-blind cross-over phase. DOBRET positive participants are those who experience at least two points pain reduction on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) on the phenytoin 10 percent cream applied area within 30 minutes and at least one-point difference in pain reduction on the NRS between phenytoin 10 percent and placebo cream applied area, in favour of the former. Participants will receive three treatments in a double blind fashion and in a randomized order: phenytoin 10 percent, phenytoin 20 percent and placebo cream. The duration of each treatment period is two weeks. Participants will cross-over two times to each of the other treatments. The study does not have wash-out periods between treatments, because the mean duration of analgesic effect after an application is expected to be less than nine hours. A blood sample will be collected at the end of the second week of the first treatment period to test for phenytoin plasma levels. Study population: The investigators aim to include 84 participants, age 40 years or older, who have been diagnoses with painful CIAP at the University Medical Center Utrecht and fulfil the inclusion criteria and have given written informed consent. Interventions: Phenytoin cream in concentrations of 10 percent and 20 percent cream compared to placebo cream. Primary endpoint: Change in pain intensity measured on the NRS between baseline and week 2 for phenytoin 20% cream versus placebo cream.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
81

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 17, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 16, 2020

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 1, 2020

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 15, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 28, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

November 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathyCIAPneuropathic pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in mean pain intensity measured on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) between baseline and week 2 for phenytoin 20% cream versus placebo cream.

    0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain. The bigger the mean change, the better the outcome

    Mean baseline vs. mean of second week of each intervention

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Change in mean pain intensity from baseline 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) to the mean NRS in the second week in double-blind response test in positive and negative participants and all participants combined

    Mean baseline vs. mean of second week of each intervention

  • Change of EuroQol (EQ5-5D-5L) from baseline to the end of the second week of each treatment period

    Baseline vs. end of second week of each intervention

  • Change of Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) from baseline to the end of the second week of each treatment period

    Baseline vs. end of second week of each intervention

  • Change of subscales of the Brief Pain Inventory (sBPI) from baseline to the end of the second week of each treatment period

    Baseline vs. end of second week of each intervention

  • Change of the 3 worst pain characteristics from baseline to the end of the second week of each treatment period

    Baseline vs. end of second week of each intervention

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Phenytoin 10 percent cream

EXPERIMENTAL

Phenytoin 10 percent cream, 2 to 4 times daily application, 2 weeks long

Drug: phenytoin cream

Phenytoin 20 percent cream

EXPERIMENTAL

Phenytoin 20 percent cream, 2 to 4 times daily application, 2 weeks long

Drug: phenytoin cream

Placebo cream

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo cream, 2 to 4 times daily application, 2 weeks long

Other: Placebo cream

Interventions

Phenytoin cream to be applied on the neuropathic pain area

Phenytoin 10 percent creamPhenytoin 20 percent cream

Placebo cream to be applied on the neuropathic pain area

Placebo cream

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients have been diagnosed with CIAP defined as: presence of symmetrical distal sensory or sensorimotor symptoms such as numbness, pins and needles, tightness, coldness, unsteadiness, muscle cramps, and weakness with onset in the feet, compatible with polyneuropathy; presence of symmetrical distal sensory or sensorimotor signs with evidence of large nerve fiber involvement such as decreased sense of touch, vibration, and proprioception, usually in the presence of decreased pin prick/temperature sense, decreased/absent tendon reflexes, or slight muscle weakness on neurologic examination, compatible with polyneuropathy; an insidious onset and slow or no progression of the polyneuropathy over the course of at least 6 months; no identifiable cause for the polyneuropathy after thorough history-taking, clinical examination, and extensive laboratory testing; no suggestion of a hereditary polyneuropathy based on detailed kinship history (i.e., one or more affected family member), neurologic examination, or confirmation by genetic analysis; and nerve conduction studies excluding a demyelinating polyneuropathy and confirming large nerve fiber involvement if the findings on neurologic examination are equivocal considering the patient's age.
  • Presence of chronic localized neuropathic pain due to CIAP
  • Neuropathic pain localized in two anatomically symmetrical areas of feet/lower legs
  • Duration of neuropathic pain ≥3 months
  • Duration of ≥1 hour neuropathic pain per day
  • Neuropathic pain characteristics defined by the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions (DN4) score ≥4
  • Mean pain score during daytime of ≥4 and \<10 on the NRS at study entry (baseline)
  • Difference of pain intensity between left and right foot and/or lower leg of not more than 1 point on the NRS
  • No changes in neuropathic pain medication for at least 1 month

You may not qualify if:

  • Painful (poly)neuropathy other than CIAP
  • Presence of neuropathic pain due to any other condition than CIAP
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy in the study period (will only be asked)
  • Use of oral phenytoin
  • Open wounds in the neuropathic pain area
  • Current use of topical analgesics
  • Presence of other pain syndromes such as the widespread pain syndrome or pain in joints
  • Presence of serious psychological/psychiatric morbidity
  • Addiction to intoxicants
  • Hypersensitivity to the study medication (active substance and excipients)
  • Insufficient mastery of the Dutch language
  • Cognitive impairment and insufficiently capable to understand the purpose of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Kopsky DJ, Vrancken AFJE, Keppel Hesselink JM, van Eijk RPA, Notermans NC. Usefulness of a Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Response Test to Demonstrate Rapid Onset Analgesia with Phenytoin 10% Cream in Polyneuropathy. J Pain Res. 2020 May 1;13:877-882. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S243434. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32431536BACKGROUND
  • Kopsky DJ, Keppel Hesselink JM. Single-Blind Placebo-Controlled Response Test with Phenytoin 10% Cream in Neuropathic Pain Patients. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2018 Nov 12;11(4):122. doi: 10.3390/ph11040122.

    PMID: 30424471BACKGROUND
  • Kopsky DJ, Keppel Hesselink JM. Phenytoin Cream for the Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Case Series. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2018 May 28;11(2):53. doi: 10.3390/ph11020053.

    PMID: 29843362BACKGROUND
  • Kopsky DJ, Keppel Hesselink JM, Russell AL, Vrancken AFJE. No Detectable Phenytoin Plasma Levels After Topical Phenytoin Cream Application in Chronic Pain: Inferences for Mechanisms of Action. J Pain Res. 2022 Feb 9;15:377-383. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S345347. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35173477BACKGROUND
  • Kopsky DJ, van Eijk RPA, Warendorf JK, Keppel Hesselink JM, Notermans NC, Vrancken AFJE. Enriched enrollment randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial with phenytoin cream in painful chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (EPHENE): a study protocol. Trials. 2022 Oct 22;23(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06806-8.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neuralgia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Alexander FJE Vrancken, MD, PhD

    UMC Utrecht

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, coordinating researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2020

First Posted

December 1, 2020

Study Start

September 17, 2020

Primary Completion

June 15, 2023

Study Completion

June 15, 2023

Last Updated

June 28, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations