Comparison of TOETVA and Conventional Thyroidectomy
TOETVA
Comparison of Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach and Open Conventional Thyroidectomy for Inflammatory Responses, Pain and Patient Satisfaction: A Prospective Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction-Objective: The application of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is gradually increasing recently. However, it is not clear whether TOETVA is a true minimally invasive thyroidectomy compared to open conventional thyroidectomy. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the TOETVA and open conventional thyroidectomy techniques in terms of postoperative inflammatory response, pain and patient satisfaction. Material and Method: In this prospective study, 40 female patients between the ages of 18-65 were divided into 2 groups of 20 patients: TOETVA: 20 patients, open thyroidectomy: 20 patients. Operation time, inflammatory response with IL-6, white blood cell (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP), postoperative pain, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction were evaluated in both groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2020
CompletedNovember 30, 2020
November 1, 2020
4 months
October 6, 2020
November 22, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Evaluate the TOETVA and Open Conventional Thyroidectomy Techniques in Terms of Postoperative Inflammatory Response by CRP (C-reactive protein)
To evaluate the TOETVA and open conventional thyroidectomy techniques in terms of postoperative inflammatory response; CRP (C-reactive protein) levels were measured in all patients for evaluating the inflammatory response at preoperative, postoperative second hour, first day and second day.
4 days
Evaluate the TOETVA and Open Conventional Thyroidectomy Techniques in Terms of Postoperative Inflammatory Response by WBC (white blood cells)
To evaluate the TOETVA and open conventional thyroidectomy techniques in terms of postoperative inflammatory response; WBC (white blood cells) levels were measured in all patients for evaluating the inflammatory response at preoperative, postoperative second hour, first day and second day.
4 days
Evaluate the TOETVA and Open Conventional Thyroidectomy Techniques in Terms of Postoperative Inflammatory Response by IL-6 (Interleukin 6)
To evaluate the TOETVA and open conventional thyroidectomy techniques in terms of postoperative inflammatory response; IL-6 (Interleukin 6) levels were measured in all patients for evaluating the inflammatory response at preoperative, postoperative second hour, first day and second day.
4 days
Evaluate the Postoperative Pain after TOETVA and Open Conventional Thyroidectomy Techniques Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale
Pain intensity of the patients was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (0 to 10) on the 2nd and 12th hour, 1st and 2nd days postoperatively. Lower lip, lower chin and anterior neck area pain were evaluated separately with VAS score. VAS scores were determined by patients by marking the intensity of pain on the ruler, which was marked as 0 for the absence of pain and as 10 for the most severe pain sensation.
4 days
Comparison of Postoperative Patient Satisfaction Between Conventional Thyroidectomy and TOETVA
Patient satisfaction was evaluated on postoperative 15th and 30th days in both groups. Patients were asked to evaluate and score the operation in general and in terms of cosmesis (1: bad and 4: very good). In addition, the patients were asked which surgery (TOETVA or conventional thyroidectomy) they would prefer if they would have the operation again.
1 month
Study Arms (2)
Conventional Thyroidectomy
OTHERConventional Thyroidectomy
Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach
Interventions
Conventional Thyroidectomy and Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be aged 18 to 65 years
- Benign thyroid disease, with FNAB results Bethesda 3,4 or below 1 cm + Bethesda V, VI
- Thyroid volume less than 50 cm3
- Largest nodule diameter must be less than 4 cm
- No previous neck, chin and oral surgery
- No vocal cord paralysis for any reason
- In the preoperative period, clinically euthyroid and laboratory results in the euthyroid state
- Agreed to participate in the study were included in the study..
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a FNAB result of Bethesda V, VI over 1 cm,
- Planning of central and/or lateral neck dissection due to thyroid cancer
- Patients with thyroid volume greater than 50 cm3
- Secondary intervention cases
- Patients with accompanying hyperparathyroidism
- Patients with preoperative vocal cord paralysis (VCP)
- Patients with ASA score III and IV
- Patients who were started with TOETVA and converted to the conventional method intraoperatively
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MUnlulead
- Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Sisli Etfal Research Hospiatl
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mehmet Uludag, 1
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2020
First Posted
November 30, 2020
Study Start
September 23, 2019
Primary Completion
January 28, 2020
Study Completion
March 30, 2020
Last Updated
November 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share