Comparison of Participants Who Received a CanGaroo® Envelope, TYRX™ Envelope, or no Envelope During CIED Implantation
HEAL
A Multi-Center Study Evaluating Participants Who Received CanGaroo® Envelope, TYRX™ Envelope, or No Envelope During CIED Implantation
1 other identifier
observational
46
1 country
11
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to gather information on participants returning at time of CIED change-out or revision who underwent a device implantation with either a CanGaroo® envelope, TYRX™ envelope, or no envelope.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for all trials
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedJanuary 9, 2024
January 1, 2024
2.7 years
November 16, 2020
January 5, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Blinded Histologic Evaluation of Biopsies Taken from the Anterior and Posterior Capsule Wall
Microscopic analysis of cellularity, vascularity, collagen density, necrosis, infectious agents, remnant device material, giant cells, and fibrotic capsule thickness will be evaluated for each biopsy site using a quantitative scoring system with an attempt to distinguish between remnant envelope collagen (if ECM envelope was used) and neocollagen from the participant. Composite (total) and average scores will be determined based on the individual scores from each biopsy site. The quantitative thickness of each fibrotic capsule biopsy will be measured using digital image software. Four (4) thickness measurements will be performed across the image for each biopsy sample, and the average fibrotic thickness will be reported for each sample. In addition, the total average thickness across the four samples will be determined based on the average individual recordings.
Surgical Procedure Visit
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Documented CIED Complications
Pre-Surgery Visit
Other Outcomes (4)
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Pre-Surgery Visit
CIED Scar Photographs
Pre-Surgery Visit
CIED Implant Photographs
Surgical Procedure Visit
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
CanGaroo Envelope
Participants who received a CanGaroo envelope during CIED implantation
TYRX Envelope
Participants who received a TYRX envelope during CIED implantation
No Envelope
Participants who did not receive an envelope during CIED implantation
Interventions
Evaluation of the difference in cohorts for soft tissue healing surrounding the CIED implant and clinical outcomes and complications.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants who underwent one or more prior CIED implantation procedure at the current implant site utilizing CanGaroo®, TYRX™, or no envelope and are returning for a CIED change-out or revision procedure.
You may qualify if:
- Participants who previously underwent one or more prior CIED implantations utilizing a CanGaroo® envelope, TYRX™ envelope, or no envelope and are returning for a CIED change-out or revision procedure at least 4 months or longer from their prior procedure.
- The following possible scenarios would be eligible for enrollment:
- a. One prior CIED Implant: i. No envelope ii. CanGaroo® envelope iii. TYRX™ envelope b. Multiple prior CIED Implants (envelope type should remain the same for each participant throughout their implant history): i. No envelope → no envelope ii. No envelope → CanGaroo® envelope iii. No envelope → TYRX™ envelope iv. CanGaroo® envelope → CanGaroo® envelope v. TYRX™ envelope → TYRX™ envelope vi. No envelope → CanGaroo® envelope → CanGaroo® envelope vii. No envelope → no envelope → CanGaroo® envelope viii. No envelope → TYRX™ envelope → TYRX™ envelope ix. No envelope → no envelope → TYRX™ envelope
- Participants aged 18 years or older at time of enrollment.
- Participant is able and agrees to provide written informed consent and use of PHI.
- Participants for whom prior CIED implant history information can be obtained.
You may not qualify if:
- Active infection involving the CIED implant site (clinical diagnosis of an active infection at the time of change-out/revision procedure).
- Participants under the age of 18 at time of enrollment.
- Participants with a history of multiple prior CIED implants over time using more than one type of envelope will be excluded as well as participants with a history of one type of envelope use, but the current pocket does not have an envelope. Scenarios that would be excluded:
- CanGaroo® envelope → TYRX™ envelope
- TYRX™ envelope → CanGaroo® envelope
- CanGaroo® envelope - no envelope
- TYRX™ envelope → no envelope
- No envelope → CanGaroo® envelope → no envelope
- No envelope → TYRX™ envelope → no envelope
- No envelope → CanGaroo® envelope → TYRX™ envelope
- No envelope → TYRX™ envelope → CanGaroo® envelope
- CanGaroo® envelope → no envelope → TYRX™ envelope
- TYRX™ envelope → no envelope → CanGaroo® envelope
- CanGaroo® envelope → TYRX™ envelope → no envelope
- TYRX™ envelope → CanGaroo® envelope → no envelope
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Elutia Inc.lead
Study Sites (11)
Valley Heart Rhythm Specialists
Chandler, Arizona, 85224, United States
Bay Pines VA
Bay Pines, Florida, 33744, United States
Baptist Medical Center
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States
University of Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209, United States
Prairie Education & Research Cooperative / St. John's Hospital
Springfield, Illinois, 62769, United States
U of L Health/Jewish Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40241, United States
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Atrium Health
Concord, North Carolina, 28025, United States
East Carolina University/Vidant Medical Center
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834, United States
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
University of Virginia Medical Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
Related Links
Biospecimen
Characteristics of soft tissue healing surrounding the CIED implant as assessed by blinded histologic evaluation of systematic biopsies taken at the time of change-out/revision.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2020
First Posted
November 27, 2020
Study Start
February 2, 2021
Primary Completion
October 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
January 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share