Increasing Treatment Efficacy Using SMART Methods for Personalizing Care
2 other identifiers
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed study will determine the feasibility, tolerability, and acceptability of a study that tests: 1) personalized treatment delivery (i.e., module sequencing and treatment discontinuation timing) aimed at increasing the efficiency of care, and 2) the research protocol designed to evaluate the effects of this personalized care. A sample of 60 participants with heterogeneous anxiety disorders (and comorbid conditions, including depression) will be enrolled in a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART). Patients will be randomly assigned to one of three sequencing conditions: transdiagnostic treatment administered in its standard module order, module sequences that prioritize capitalizing on relative strengths, and module sequences that prioritize compensating for relative weaknesses. Next, after 6 sessions, participants will be randomly assigned to either continue or discontinue treatment to evaluate post-treatment change at varying levels of target engagement. This proposal will enable us to 1) test the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of the research protocol, treatment sequencing conditions, and early treatment discontinuation, 2) determine whether a preliminary signal that capitalization or compensation module sequencing improves treatment efficiency exists, and 3) explore preliminary associations between core process engagement at treatment discontinuation and later symptom improvement. The proposed study, and the subsequent research it will support, will inform evidence-based decision rules to make existing treatments more efficient, ultimately reducing patient costs and increasing the mental health service system's capacity to address the needs of more individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 30, 2025
CompletedJuly 30, 2025
July 1, 2025
3 years
November 18, 2020
May 13, 2025
July 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in Clinical Severity From Baseline to 6 Weeks (Brief Intervention) or 12 Weeks (Full Intervention)
Clinical severity will be measured using the Diagnostic Interview for Anxiety, Mood, and Obsessive Compulsive and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders (DIAMOND) dimensional clinician ratings. Scores range from 1-7; higher scores indicate greater severity. Negative scores indicate symptom improvement.
Baseline to 6 weeks (Brief Intervention), Baseline to 12 weeks (Full Intervention
Change in Self-Reported Anxiety Symptoms From Baseline to 6 Weeks (Brief Intervention) or 12 Weeks (Full Intervention)
Anxiety symptoms will be measured using the Overall Anxiety Severity and Interference Scale (OASIS). This is a self-report measure in which scores range from 0-20; higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms. Negative scores indicate symptom improvement. assessed at baseline and weekly for 6 or 12 weeks, change from baseline after 6 sessions (6 weeks) and after 12 sessions (12 weeks) are being reported
Baseline to 6 weeks (Brief Intervention), Baseline to 12 weeks (Full Intervention)
Change in Self-Reported Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to 6 Weeks (Brief Intervention) or 12 Weeks (Full Intervention)
Depressive symptoms will be measured using the Overall Depression Severity and Interference Scale (ODSIS). This is a self-report measure in which scores range from 0-20; higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms. Negative scores indicate symptom improvement. assessed at baseline and weekly for 6 or 12 weeks, change from baseline after 6 sessions (6 weeks) and after 12 sessions (12 weeks) are being reported
Baseline to 6 weeks (Brief Intervention), Baseline to 12 weeks (Full Intervention)
Change in Self-Reported Aversive Reactions to Emotions From Baseline to 6 Weeks (Brief Intervention) or 12 Weeks (Full Intervention)
Aversive reactions to emotions will be measured using the distress aversion subscale of the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (MEAQ). This is a self-report measure in which scores range from 13-78; higher scores indicate greater negative reactions to emotional experiences. Negative scores indicate symptom improvement. assessed at baseline and weekly for 6 or 12 weeks, change from baseline after 6 sessions (6 weeks) and after 12 sessions (12 weeks) are being reported
Baseline to 6 weeks (Brief Intervention), Baseline to 12 weeks (Full Intervention)
Change in Clinician-Rated Anxiety Symptoms From Baseline to 6 Weeks (Brief Intervention) or 12 Weeks (Full Intervention)
Clinician-rated anxiety symptoms will be measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety Symptoms. Scores range from 0-56; higher scores indicate greater severity. Negative scores indicate symptom improvement. Outcomes for participants in brief intervention groups is the difference in clinician rated symptom scores before and after 6 treatment sessions and outcomes for participants in full intervention groups is the difference in clinician rated symptom scores before and after 12 sessions.
Baseline to 6 weeks (Brief Intervention), Baseline to 12 weeks (Full Intervention)
Change in Clinician-Rated Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to 6 Weeks (Brief Intervention) or 12 Weeks (Full Intervention)
Clinician-rated depressive symptoms will be measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depressive Symptoms. Scores range from 0-68; higher scores indicate greater severity. Negative scores indicate symptom improvement. Outcomes for participants in brief intervention groups is the difference in Clinician-Rated symptom scores before and after 6 treatment sessions and outcomes for participants in full intervention groups is the difference in Clinician-Rated symptom scores before and after 12 sessions.
Baseline to 6 weeks (Brief Intervention), Baseline to 12 weeks (Full Intervention)
Study Arms (6)
Standard Group, Brief Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive 6 sessions of treatment in accordance with the standard, published Unified Protocol (UP) manual.
Standard Group, Full Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive 12 sessions of treatment in accordance with the standard, published Unified Protocol (UP) manual.
Capitalization Group, Brief Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive 6 sessions of treatment organized to prioritize skills that capitalize on patient strengths.
Capitalization Group, Full Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive 12 sessions of treatment organized to prioritize skills that capitalize on patient strengths.
Compensation Group, Brief Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive 6 sessions of treatment organized to prioritize skills that compensate for patient weaknesses.
Compensation Group, Full Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive 12 sessions of treatment organized to prioritize skills that compensate for patient weaknesses.
Interventions
Participants will receive treatment modules sequenced in accordance with the Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP; Barlow et al 2011; 2018).
Participants will receive Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) treatment modules organized to prioritize skills that capitalize on patient strengths.
Participants will receive Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) treatment modules organized to prioritize skills that compensate for patient weaknesses.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of at least one anxiety disorder, trauma- or stressor-related disorder, or obsessive-compulsive disorder
- fluent in English
- medication stability
You may not qualify if:
- concurrent therapy
- psychological condition that would be better addressed by alternative treatments
- have received more than 5 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy in the past 5 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40506, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sauer-Zavala
- Organization
- University of Kentucky
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shannon Sauer-Zavala
University of Kentucky
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2020
First Posted
November 24, 2020
Study Start
June 22, 2021
Primary Completion
June 15, 2024
Study Completion
June 15, 2024
Last Updated
July 30, 2025
Results First Posted
July 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share