Motivating Recruitment and Efficacy in Normative Feedback Interventions
1 other identifier
interventional
498
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Excessive alcohol consumption among college students continues to be a serious public health concern associated with a wide range of negative consequences. Brief computer-based social norms interventions, including personalized normative feedback (PNF), have shown consistent effects in reducing problematic drinking in this population, and there is some evidence that in-lab computer-delivered interventions may be more effective than remote interventions. Most studies have been conducted using generous incentives which may reduce the feasibility of dissemination on a larger scale and may undermine trial efficacy. In accordance with NIAAA aims, this research aims to (a) investigate delivery modality (i.e., in lab versus remotely) and incentives as important factors affecting the efficacy of PNF interventions and (b) develop intervention strategies that facilitate wider dissemination of inexpensive empirically-supported brief interventions for college students, thereby reducing problem drinking during a high-risk time period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 23, 2020
CompletedNovember 23, 2020
November 1, 2020
1.7 years
October 26, 2020
November 16, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Number of drinks in past month - Timeline Follow-back (TLFB)
This measure asks participants to indicate how many drinks they consumed on each day of the previous month. Scores are summed.
1 month
Number of drinks on a typical week - Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ)
Participants are asked how many drinks they typically drink on each day of a typical week. These values are summed to create a drinks per week score. From Collins, Parks, and Marlatt (1985).
3 months
Number of peak drinks consumed
Participants are asked to indicate the maximum number of drinks consumed on one occasion.
One month
Alcohol-related consequences: Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ)
A measure of 27 alcohol consequences. Participants indicate whether they have experienced the consequence or not and responses are summed to create a total score.
One month
Alcohol-related consequences: Rutgers Alcohol Problems Index (RAPI)
A measure of alcohol consequences. Participants indicate the frequency with which they have experienced each consequence; responses are summed to create a total score.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Perception of number of drinks a typical college student drinks
3 months
Study Arms (8)
Control-Remote-$0
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, Participants: * receive attention control feedback * complete the baseline and intervention procedure remotely * are compensated $0 for completing the baseline and intervention procedure
Control-Remote-$30
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, Participants: * receive attention control feedback * complete the baseline and intervention procedure remotely * are compensated $30 for completing the baseline and intervention procedure
Control-InPerson-$0
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, Participants: * receive attention control feedback * complete the baseline and intervention procedure in the research lab * are compensated $0 for completing the baseline and intervention procedure
Control-InPerson-$30
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, Participants: * receive attention control feedback * complete the baseline and intervention procedure in the research lab * are compensated $30 for completing the baseline and intervention procedure
PNF-Remote-$0
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, Participants: * receive personalized normative feedback * complete the baseline and intervention procedure remotely * are compensated $0 for completing the baseline and intervention procedure
PNF-Remote-$30
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, Participants: * receive personalized normative feedback * complete the baseline and intervention procedure remotely * are compensated $30 for completing the baseline and intervention procedure
PNF-Inperson-$0
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, Participants: * receive personalized normative feedback * complete the baseline and intervention procedure in the research lab * are compensated $0 for completing the baseline and intervention procedure
PNF-Inperson-$30
EXPERIMENTALIn this condition, Participants: * receive personalized normative feedback * complete the baseline and intervention procedure in the research lab * are compensated $30 for completing the baseline and intervention procedure
Interventions
Information presenting perceived and actual drinking norms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Reporting one or more heavy drinking occasions (4/5 drinks on one drinking occasion for women/men) in the previous month Reporting one or more negative alcohol-related consequence in the previous month Being between 18 and 26 years of age Being a registered University of Houston student Providing consent to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Houston
Houston, Texas, 77204, United States
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2020
First Posted
November 23, 2020
Study Start
September 10, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 31, 2017
Last Updated
November 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share