NCT04638244

Brief Summary

These unparalleled size, nature and complexity of youth mental health problems would leave a huge gap to fill after the Millennium, which would need stratified and timely interventions to improve the mental well-being and metal health of the youth in the general population. The use of music has been explored in improving the mental well-being and mental health in the young people. The progressively digitalized lifestyle of the youth as the digital natives is paralleled by frequent use of online music in their daily activities. This means that online music interventions can be a new, youth-friendly and accessible means to deliver interventions to the youth to improve their mental well-being and mental health. Therefore, it is worthwhile to further explore the potential as well as underlying mechanisms of online music in improving youth mental well-being and mental health in the community among young people as a population lifestyle strategy. In this study, the investigators would conduct a Randomized Control Study on Brief Online Music Intervention (BOMI) by listening to a selected, guided and self-chosen online song each day actively in a personalized and focused way in improving the mental well-being of young people in the community. In the end, the possible design and promotion of specific, guided and evidence-based self-help brief online music intervention by listening to music daily as a lifestyle change can be an economic, convenient and evidenced-based mental well-being intervention strategy among the youth at a population level. Aim: To study the effects of listening to an expert-selected, theory-guided and self-chosen online song each day actively in a personalized and focused way (Brief Online Music Intervention: BOMI) in improving mental well-being among young people in the community in Hong Kong Hypothesis: Listening to an expert-selected, theory-guided and self-chosen song each day actively in a personalized and focused way (Brief Online Music Intervention: BOMI) can improve mental well-being in the community among young people

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 10, 2020

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 20, 2020

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 15, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

November 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 11, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Mental Well-beingOnline MusicYoung PeopleRandomized Controlled Trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from Baseline Mental Well-being at 3 months

    WHO 5 (World Health Organization (Five) Well-being Index); score from 0 to 25; a higher score means a better result

    Baseline and 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Change from Baseline Mental Distress at 3 months

    Baseline and 3 months

  • Change from Baseline Mental Health at 3 months

    Baseline and 3 months

  • Change from Baseline Musical Engagement at 3 months

    Baseline and 3 months

  • Change from Baseline Mindfulness at 3 months

    Baseline and 3 months

  • Change from Baseline Quality of Life at 3 months

    Baseline and 3 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

BOMI Group (Intervention Group)

EXPERIMENTAL

Listening to an expert-selected, theory-guided and self-chosen song each day actively in a personalized and focused way (Brief Online Music Intervention: BOMI) for 3 months

Behavioral: Music

POM Group (Control Group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Receiving psychoeducational online message (POM) (for focused reading for 5 minutes) daily for 3 months

Behavioral: Reading messages

Interventions

MusicBEHAVIORAL

Brief Online Music

BOMI Group (Intervention Group)

Reading psychoeducational messages

POM Group (Control Group)

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • No daily active, personalized and focused music listening in last 1 month (i.e. no daily self-chosen and personalized music listening with full attention)
  • Living in community

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to access to internet and online music streaming platform daily
  • No digital device with access to online music streaming platform

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (17)

  • Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):593-602. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.

    PMID: 15939837BACKGROUND
  • Lonsdale AJ, North AC. Why do we listen to music? A uses and gratifications analysis. Br J Psychol. 2011 Feb;102(1):108-34. doi: 10.1348/000712610X506831.

    PMID: 21241288BACKGROUND
  • Batt-Rawden KB, DeNora, T, Ruud E. Music listening and empowerment in health promotion: A study of the role and significance of music in everyday life of the long-term ill. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 2005;14:20-136

    BACKGROUND
  • Gold C, Solli HP, Kruger V, Lie SA. Dose-response relationship in music therapy for people with serious mental disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;29(3):193-207. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

    PMID: 19269725BACKGROUND
  • MacDonald R, Kreutz G, Mitchell L. What is music, health and wellbeing and why is it important? In R. MacDonald, G. Kreutz & L. Mitchell (Eds.), Music, Health, and Wellbeing. New York: Oxford University Press 2012;3-11.

    BACKGROUND
  • Juslin PN. From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Phys Life Rev. 2013 Sep;10(3):235-66. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 29.

    PMID: 23769678BACKGROUND
  • Saarikallio S, Gold C, McFerran K. Development and validation of the Healthy-Unhealthy Music Scale. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2015 Nov;20(4):210-217. doi: 10.1111/camh.12109. Epub 2015 May 18.

    PMID: 26726295BACKGROUND
  • DeNora T. Music in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2000

    BACKGROUND
  • McFerran K, Garrido S, O'Grady L, Grocke D, Sawyer SM. Examining the relationship between self-reported mood management and music preferences in Australian teenagers. Nord. J. Music Ther. 2015;24:1-17.

    BACKGROUND
  • Garrido S., Schubert E. Moody melodies: do they cheer us up? A study of the effect of sad music on mood. Psychol. Music. 2015;43:244-261.

    BACKGROUND
  • Garrido S., Schubert E. Music and people with tendencies to depression. Music Percept. 2015;32:313-321.

    BACKGROUND
  • Carpentier FR, Brown JD, Bertocci M, Silk JS, Forbes EE, Dahl RE. Sad Kids, Sad Media? Applying Mood Management Theory to Depressed Adolescents' Use of Media. Media Psychol. 2008 Jan 1;11(1):143-166. doi: 10.1080/15213260701834484.

    PMID: 19768135BACKGROUND
  • Stewart J, Garrido S, Hense C, McFerran K. Music Use for Mood Regulation: Self-Awareness and Conscious Listening Choices in Young People With Tendencies to Depression. Front Psychol. 2019 May 24;10:1199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01199. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31178806BACKGROUND
  • Chang HY, Huang SC, Wu JH. A personalized music recommnedation system based on electroencephalography feedback. Multimedia Tools and Application. 2017;76:19523-19542.

    BACKGROUND
  • de Witte M, Spruit A, van Hooren S, Moonen X, Stams GJ. Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: a systematic review and two meta-analyses. Health Psychol Rev. 2020 Jun;14(2):294-324. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1627897. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

    PMID: 31167611BACKGROUND
  • Papinczak Z, Dingle GA, Stoyanov SR, Hides L. Young people's uses of music for wellbeing. Journal of Youth Studies. 2015 Feb;18(9).

    BACKGROUND
  • de la Cruz OL, Rodríguez-Carvajal R. Mindfulness and Music: A Promising Subject of an Unmapped Field. Int J Behav Res Psychol. 2014, 2(3), 27-35.

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychological Well-Being

Interventions

Music Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Personal SatisfactionBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sensory Art TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CarePsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized Controlled Trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2020

First Posted

November 20, 2020

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

September 1, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2024

Last Updated

April 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share