Imagery Rescripting and Imaginal Exposure for Social Anxiety: Mechanisms and Outcomes in an Analog Sample
Imagery Based Interventions for the Treatment of Anxiety Related Disorders: Mechanisms and Optimizing Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will recruit 100 participants who self-report high symptoms of social anxiety (Social phobia inventory \>30). Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either one analog intervention of Imagery Rescripting (IR) or Imaginal Exposure. We will test the efficacy and mechanisms behind each interventions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 19, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2023
CompletedOctober 26, 2022
October 1, 2022
2.3 years
November 8, 2020
October 25, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in the Social phobia inventory (SPIN) at the follow-up session
The SPIN is a validated self-report instrument assessing average social phobia symptom intensity over the past week. possible scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (Extremly). change = (follow-up score - Baseline Score)
Will be measured at Baseline (6,9, or 12 days before intervention), Post-intervention (immediately after the intervention) and Follow-up ( 7 days after the intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Change from Baseline in the Thought fusion inventory (TFI) at the follow-up session
Will be measured at Baseline (6,9, or 12 days before intervention), Post-intervention (immediately after the intervention) and Follow-up ( 7 days after the intervention)
Change from Baseline in the White Bear Suppresion inventory (WBSI) at the follow-up session
Will be measured at Baseline (6,9, or 12 days before intervention), Post-intervention (immediately after the intervention) and Follow-up ( 7 days after the intervention)
Change from Baseline in the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) international version short form (10 items from the negative subscale only) at the follow-up session
Will be measured at Baseline (6,9, or 12 days before intervention) and Follow-up ( 7 days after the intervention)
Change from Baseline to follow-up in the amount of negative and positive/neutral content details the participant provides while describing the negative imagery. The imagery will be probed using the Waterloo Image and Memories Interview (WIMI).
Will be measured at Baseline (6,9, or 12 days before intervention) and Follow-up ( 7 days after the intervention)
Change from Baseline to follow-up in negativity of the core-beliefs that the participant link to the negative imagery provided in the WIMI.
Will be measured at Baseline (6,9, or 12 days before intervention) and Follow-up ( 7 days after the intervention)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Interview for Anxiety, Mood, and OCD and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders (DIAMOND)
Baseline only
Study Arms (2)
Imaginal exposure
EXPERIMENTALA behavioral intervention in imagery
Imagery rescripting
EXPERIMENTALA different behavioral intervention in imagery
Interventions
Participants in this arm will be asked to decide alongside with the intervention provider (a clinical PhD student or M.A student under the supervision of the principal investigator) to imagine a script based on a future distressing anxiety provoking scenarios multiple times while honing in on the most negative aspects.
Participants in this arm will be asked to decide alongside with the intervention provider (a clinical PhD student or M.A student under the supervision of the principal investigator) o imagine a script based on a future distressing anxiety provoking scenarios one time while honing in on the most negative aspects. Afterwards they will insert changes into the script that try to help them cope in the imagery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- can't report a negative imagery related to a future social scenario. Attending active psychotherapy sessions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Jerusalem, 9190501, Israel
Related Publications (6)
Aderka IM, Pollack MH, Simon NM, Smits JA, Van Ameringen M, Stein MB, Hofmann SG. Development of a brief version of the Social Phobia Inventory using item response theory: the Mini-SPIN-R. Behav Ther. 2013 Dec;44(4):651-61. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 May 3.
PMID: 24094790BACKGROUNDConnor KM, Davidson JR, Churchill LE, Sherwood A, Foa E, Weisler RH. Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). New self-rating scale. Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;176:379-86. doi: 10.1192/bjp.176.4.379.
PMID: 10827888BACKGROUNDMuris P, Merckelbach H, Horselenberg R. Individual differences in thought suppression. The White Bear Suppression Inventory: factor structure, reliability, validity and correlates. Behav Res Ther. 1996 May-Jun;34(5-6):501-13. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(96)00005-8.
PMID: 8687372BACKGROUNDRomano M, Moscovitch DA, Saini P, Huppert JD. The effects of positive interpretation bias on cognitive reappraisal and social performance: Implications for social anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2020 Aug;131:103651. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103651. Epub 2020 May 22.
PMID: 32504886BACKGROUNDMoscovitch DA, Vidovic V, Lenton-Brym AP, Dupasquier JR, Barber KC, Hudd T, Zabara N, Romano M. Autobiographical memory retrieval and appraisal in social anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2018 Aug;107:106-116. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
PMID: 29960125BACKGROUNDTolin DF, Gilliam C, Wootton BM, Bowe W, Bragdon LB, Davis E, Hannan SE, Steinman SA, Worden B, Hallion LS. Psychometric Properties of a Structured Diagnostic Interview for DSM-5 Anxiety, Mood, and Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. Assessment. 2018 Jan;25(1):3-13. doi: 10.1177/1073191116638410. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
PMID: 26988404BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan D Huppert, PhD
Professor
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcomes assessor that assess mental imagery content (see secondary outcomes) are blind to the condition.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, PhD, Certified Clinical Psychologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2020
First Posted
November 19, 2020
Study Start
April 19, 2021
Primary Completion
August 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 1, 2023
Last Updated
October 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share