Organization of Pulmonary Rehabilitation of Post-COVID-19 Patient With Sequelae (REHABCOVID)
REHABCOVID
2 other identifiers
interventional
23
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Some patients with COVID-19 have sequelae after the acute phase of infection. These sequelae can be physical (dyspnea, exercise intolerance, abnormal fatigue) but also psychic (anxiety, depression). Systemic sequelae have also been observed in pulmonary, cardiac, hepatic, renal, nervous or immune systems. Respiratory rehabilitation (RR) is indicated in these patients to help their complete recovery without sequelae. These patients' arrival and sanitary constraints imposed by COVID-19 changed the organization of Health Care Centers (HCC). Risk of contagiousness after the acute phase of infection still exists. Consequently, patients must respect a quarantine time on their arrival in HCC and then have no contact with other HCC patients to respect the barrier rules and social distancing measures. HCC accommodation capacities are reduced and this is to the detriment of patients with chronic diseases for whom RR is essential. Certain HCCs saturation can also be responsible for a non-proposal of RR in the care pathway of patients after COVID-19. To cope with the new constraints imposed by Covid-19 pandemic, telemedicine is being developed in the affected industrial countries. Some SRH physicians are starting to offer post-COVID-19 patients the possibility of carrying out a tele-rehabilitation program (TRR). Such a telemedicine program has been validated for people with respiratory failure. It allows the patient to follow his care program without leaving his home and it does not require the visit from a health professional. In addition to reducing the inflow of post COVID-19 patients in HCC, it allows fragile patients to respect social distancing. It could also contain virus spread virus on the territory by reducing patient movements. When choosing between RR and TRR, the clinician must ask himself two questions. Is TRR as efficient as RR for post-COVID-19 patients? Is there a profile of patients for whom either method gives better results? This study proposes to evaluate both methods: a 4-week TRR program vs a conventional RR program in post COVID-19 patients with sequelae. If the hypothesis that both methods have similar effects is verified, this would allow the generalization of the prescription of TRR. The benefits will be individual with greater access to respiratory rehabilitation for post COVID-19 patients. There will also be collective public health benefits by maintaining sufficient access to HCC for patients with chronic diseases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable covid19
Started Dec 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable covid19
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 5, 2022
CompletedFebruary 9, 2023
October 1, 2022
1.1 years
November 17, 2020
February 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Distance walked in the 6-min walk test (6 MWT).
The 6-min walk test (6 MWT) measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). (ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2002)
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of repetitions performed in a 1-min Sit-to-Stand (STS) test
8 weeks
Dyspnea evaluated by the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC)
8 weeks
Fatigue evaluated by the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)
8 weeks
Anxiety and Depression evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Respiratory rehabilitation program group (RR).
ACTIVE COMPARATORPost-COVID-19 patients carrying out a respiratory rehabilitation program (RR).
Respiratory tele-rehabilitation program group (TRR).
EXPERIMENTALPost-COVID-19 patients carrying out a respiratory tele-rehabilitation program (TRR).
Interventions
Patients in the RR group will follow the respiratory rehabilitation program during a 4-week hospitalization in the respiratory diseases department of Renée Sabran hospital (Hyères, France). The program includes for each week: One medical consultation Four 40-min sessions of aerobic exercises on an ergocycle Four 1-hour sessions of walking in Renée Sabran Hospital's park Three 1-hour sessions of muscle strengthening exercises One 1-hour session of sophrology One 1-hour session of occupational therapy One 1-hour session of psychomotricity
Patients in the TRR group will realize the 4-week respiratory tele-rehabilitation program at home. The TRR program for each week includes the same sessions as RR program. But, medical consultation, sophrology, occupational therapy, psychomotricity and muscle strengthening sessions are carried out through live videoconferences. Additionally, aerobic and walking sessions are carried out outside home. The intensity of each session will be controlled by heart rate monitor.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects over 18 years old.
- Subjects having contracted COVID-19 as evidenced by a positive RT-PCR test and / or the presence of antibodies.
- Subjects having had a medical prescription for respiratory rehabilitation.
- Subject having the hardware and network coverage necessary to achieve a videoconference.
- Subjects with at least one of the following post-COVID-19 sequelae:
- Dyspnea at rest or during exercise objectified by the mMRC (modified Medical Research Council) scale with a score greater than or equal to 2. (Vestbo et al, 2013)
- Dysfunction of ventilation objectified by the Nijmegen questionnaire with a score greater than or equal to 23/64 (Van Dixhoorn and Duivenvoordent, 1985)
- Exercise intolerance objectified by the 1min-STS according to the standards by age and sex established by Strassmann et al (2013).
- Abnormal fatigue objectified by the MFI-20 (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory) validated in French by Gentile et al (2003) according to the age and sex standards established by Schwarz et al (2003).
- State of anxiety or depression objectified by the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) validated in French by Roberge et al (2013) according to the standards by age and sex established by Bocéréan and Ducret (2014)
- Patients covered by social security or equivalent regimen
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects infected again by SARS-CoV-2 during the study as evidenced by a positive RT-PCR test
- Every deterioration of patient physical or psychological state (linked for example to injury or disease) requiring rehabilitation program arrest or incapacity to perform functional tests or to answer questionnaires
- Cardio-vascular contraindications to exercise
- Instability of the respiratory state
- Neuromuscular, osteoarticular or psychiatric disease making exercise impossible
- Person presenting severe depression according to DSM-5 criteria
- Person not mastering enough French language reading and understanding to be able to consent in writing to participate in the study
- Every condition which, according to investigator, might increase or compromise the person security in case of study participation
- Patient with medical history which, according to investigator, might interfere with objective assessment and study results
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
- Patient under legal protection measure or not able to express his consent
- Patient not able to follow study procedures and to respect the visits during all study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Hôpital Nord (AP-HM)
Marseille, Bouches Du Rhône, 13915, France
Hôpital Renée Sabran
Hyères, Var, 83400, France
HIA Sainte Anne
Toulon, Var, 83000, France
Related Publications (6)
ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. No abstract available.
PMID: 12091180BACKGROUNDCrook S, Puhan MA, Frei A; STAND-UP and RIMTCORE study groups. The validation of the sit-to-stand test for COPD patients. Eur Respir J. 2017 Sep 20;50(3):1701506. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01506-2017. Print 2017 Sep. No abstract available.
PMID: 28931670BACKGROUNDVestbo J, Hurd SS, Agusti AG, Jones PW, Vogelmeier C, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Fabbri LM, Martinez FJ, Nishimura M, Stockley RA, Sin DD, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb 15;187(4):347-65. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201204-0596PP. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
PMID: 22878278BACKGROUNDSchwarz R, Krauss O, Hinz A. Fatigue in the general population. Onkologie. 2003 Apr;26(2):140-4. doi: 10.1159/000069834.
PMID: 12771522BACKGROUNDRoberge P, Dore I, Menear M, Chartrand E, Ciampi A, Duhoux A, Fournier L. A psychometric evaluation of the French Canadian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a large primary care population. J Affect Disord. 2013 May;147(1-3):171-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.10.029. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
PMID: 23218249BACKGROUNDVallier JM, Simon C, Bronstein A, Dumont M, Jobic A, Paleiron N, Mely L. Randomized controlled trial of home-based vs. hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation in post COVID-19 patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb;59(1):103-110. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07702-4. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
PMID: 36700245RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jean-Marc Vallier, MD
Toulon University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2020
First Posted
November 18, 2020
Study Start
December 10, 2020
Primary Completion
January 5, 2022
Study Completion
January 5, 2022
Last Updated
February 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share