NCT04628949

Brief Summary

This study will assess how the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope performs in procedures that treat problems of the bile and pancreatic ducts.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
248

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

9 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 5, 2020

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 16, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 25, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 27, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 5, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Endoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographyERCPDuodenoscopeEndoscopeaScope DuodenoaBox

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To evaluate the ERCP procedural success rates with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope when completing the ERCP procedure for the intended indication(s).

    Procedure success will be defined as the successful completion of the ERCP procedure with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope. The procedural success rate will be the incidence rate of success for the ERCP procedure.

    Procedure Completion (Day 0)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • To establish comprehensive performance attributes of aScope™ Duodeno endoscope through its use by multiple endoscopists in conducting various ERCP procedures.

    Procedure Completion (Day 0)

  • To evaluate rate of conversion to a reusable endoscope, other endoscope or an open procedure from the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope during the ERCP procedure.

    Procedure Completion (Day 0)

  • To evaluate rate of successful completion of a converted ERCP procedure.

    Procedure Completion (Day 0)

  • To evaluate the device deficiency rate for the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope.

    Procedure Completion (Day 0)

  • To evaluate physician satisfaction with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope.

    Procedure Completion (Day 0)

Other Outcomes (1)

  • To evaluate safety of the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope in ERCP.

    Day 30 (+3) Post-Procedure

Study Arms (1)

aScope™ Duodeno endoscope and aBox™ Duodeno

EXPERIMENTAL

Eligible subjects who are undergoing non-emergent, clinically indicated ERCP using aScope™ Duodeno endoscope and aBox™ Duodeno.

Device: aScope™ Duodeno endoscope and aBox™ Duodeno

Interventions

The aScope™ Duodeno endoscope is a sterile single-use disposable duodenoscope indicated for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures.The aScope™ Duodeno endoscope is designed to be used with aBox Duodeno, endoscopic accessories and other ancillary equipment for ERCP procedures. The aBox Duodeno is the console that is necessary for processing the endoscope camera´s video image, regarding the remote switches and output video and recorder data. The aBox Duodeno is designed to be used with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope.

aScope™ Duodeno endoscope and aBox™ Duodeno

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is ≥ 18 years old.
  • Subject is indicated and scheduled for an elective, non-emergent ERCP.
  • Subject is willing and able to give informed consent and HIPAA authorization.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy including:
  • Billroth II
  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
  • Loop gastric bypass
  • Post-Whipple
  • Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy
  • Subject requires an emergency ERCP (emergent decompression procedure within 6-12 hours of presentation to prevent life-threatening sequelae).
  • Subject has any of the following severe co-morbid conditions
  • Morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40)
  • Unstable cardiopulmonary conditions
  • Severe and uncorrectable coagulopathy
  • Severe and uncorrectable thrombocytopenia
  • Subject has clinically significant esophageal, pyloric or duodenal strictures.
  • Subject has been previously been treated under this investigational plan.
  • Subject is pregnant or female with reproductive capability who is unwilling to have a pre-procedure pregnancy test and use birth control.
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

University of Colorado Hospital

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

Southwest Gastroenterology

Oak Lawn, Illinois, 60523, United States

Location

Indiana University, University Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

NYU Langone Health

New York, New York, 10016, United States

Location

Mount Sinai South Nassau

Oceanside, New York, 11572, United States

Location

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L, Czako L, Gyokeres T, Manes G, Meier P, Poley JW, Ponchon T, Tringali A, Bellisario C, Minozzi S, Senore C, Bennett C, Bretthauer M, Hassan C, Kaminski MF, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rees CJ, Spada C, Valori R, Bisschops R, Rutter MD. Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Dec;6(10):1448-1460. doi: 10.1177/2050640618808157. Epub 2018 Oct 19.

    PMID: 30574315BACKGROUND
  • Baron, Kozarek, Carr-Locke, et al. ERCP 3rd Edition. Elsevier. 2019.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lee DH, Kim DB, Kim HY, Baek HS, Kwon SY, Lee MH, Park JC. Increasing potential risks of contamination from repetitive use of endoscope. Am J Infect Control. 2015 May 1;43(5):e13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

    PMID: 25726130BACKGROUND
  • Alfa MJ, Olson N, DeGagne P, Jackson M. A survey of reprocessing methods, residual viable bioburden, and soil levels in patient-ready endoscopic retrograde choliangiopancreatography duodenoscopes used in Canadian centers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;23(4):198-206. doi: 10.1086/502035.

    PMID: 12002234BACKGROUND
  • Petersen BT. Duodenoscope reprocessing: risk and options coming into view. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):484-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.07.004. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26279349BACKGROUND
  • Ross AS, Baliga C, Verma P, Duchin J, Gluck M. A quarantine process for the resolution of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Jun 16.

    PMID: 26092616BACKGROUND
  • USA FDA: Medical Device Safety: Safety Communications. The FDA Continues to Remind Facilities of the Importance of Following Duodenoscope Reprocessing Instructions: FDA Safety Communication. 12 April 2019.

    BACKGROUND
  • USA FDA: Medical Device Safety: Safety Communications. The FDA is Recommending Transition to Duodenoscopes with Innovative Designs to Enhance Safety: FDA Safety Communication. 29 August 2019.

    BACKGROUND
  • Balan GG, Rosca I, Ursu EL, Fifere A, Varganici CD, Doroftei F, Turin-Moleavin IA, Sandru V, Constantinescu G, Timofte D, Stefanescu G, Trifan A, Sfarti CV. Duodenoscope-Associated Infections beyond the Elevator Channel: Alternative Causes for Difficult Reprocessing. Molecules. 2019 Jun 25;24(12):2343. doi: 10.3390/molecules24122343.

    PMID: 31242689BACKGROUND
  • Cotton PB, Eisen G, Romagnuolo J, Vargo J, Baron T, Tarnasky P, Schutz S, Jacobson B, Bott C, Petersen B. Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):868-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.036. Epub 2011 Mar 5.

    PMID: 21377673BACKGROUND
  • Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

    PMID: 31863440BACKGROUND
  • ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, Bruining DH, Eloubeidi MA, Fanelli RD, Faulx AL, Gurudu SR, Kothari S, Lightdale JR, Qumseya BJ, Shaukat A, Wang A, Wani SB, Yang J, DeWitt JM. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):32-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.051. Epub 2016 Aug 18. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27546389BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Elizabeth Smith

    Ambu Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Prospective, Non-Randomized, Single-Arm, Post-Market Observational Study
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2020

First Posted

November 16, 2020

Study Start

January 25, 2021

Primary Completion

January 27, 2022

Study Completion

February 28, 2022

Last Updated

August 1, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations