A Single-Use Duodenoscope in a Real-World Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
248
1 country
9
Brief Summary
This study will assess how the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope performs in procedures that treat problems of the bile and pancreatic ducts.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2022
CompletedAugust 1, 2022
July 1, 2022
1 year
November 5, 2020
July 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the ERCP procedural success rates with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope when completing the ERCP procedure for the intended indication(s).
Procedure success will be defined as the successful completion of the ERCP procedure with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope. The procedural success rate will be the incidence rate of success for the ERCP procedure.
Procedure Completion (Day 0)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
To establish comprehensive performance attributes of aScope™ Duodeno endoscope through its use by multiple endoscopists in conducting various ERCP procedures.
Procedure Completion (Day 0)
To evaluate rate of conversion to a reusable endoscope, other endoscope or an open procedure from the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope during the ERCP procedure.
Procedure Completion (Day 0)
To evaluate rate of successful completion of a converted ERCP procedure.
Procedure Completion (Day 0)
To evaluate the device deficiency rate for the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope.
Procedure Completion (Day 0)
To evaluate physician satisfaction with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope.
Procedure Completion (Day 0)
Other Outcomes (1)
To evaluate safety of the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope in ERCP.
Day 30 (+3) Post-Procedure
Study Arms (1)
aScope™ Duodeno endoscope and aBox™ Duodeno
EXPERIMENTALEligible subjects who are undergoing non-emergent, clinically indicated ERCP using aScope™ Duodeno endoscope and aBox™ Duodeno.
Interventions
The aScope™ Duodeno endoscope is a sterile single-use disposable duodenoscope indicated for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures.The aScope™ Duodeno endoscope is designed to be used with aBox Duodeno, endoscopic accessories and other ancillary equipment for ERCP procedures. The aBox Duodeno is the console that is necessary for processing the endoscope camera´s video image, regarding the remote switches and output video and recorder data. The aBox Duodeno is designed to be used with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is ≥ 18 years old.
- Subject is indicated and scheduled for an elective, non-emergent ERCP.
- Subject is willing and able to give informed consent and HIPAA authorization.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy including:
- Billroth II
- Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
- Loop gastric bypass
- Post-Whipple
- Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy
- Subject requires an emergency ERCP (emergent decompression procedure within 6-12 hours of presentation to prevent life-threatening sequelae).
- Subject has any of the following severe co-morbid conditions
- Morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40)
- Unstable cardiopulmonary conditions
- Severe and uncorrectable coagulopathy
- Severe and uncorrectable thrombocytopenia
- Subject has clinically significant esophageal, pyloric or duodenal strictures.
- Subject has been previously been treated under this investigational plan.
- Subject is pregnant or female with reproductive capability who is unwilling to have a pre-procedure pregnancy test and use birth control.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ambu A/Slead
- Ambu Inc.collaborator
- Infinite Clinical Solutionscollaborator
- Prelude Dynamicscollaborator
Study Sites (9)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Southwest Gastroenterology
Oak Lawn, Illinois, 60523, United States
Indiana University, University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
NYU Langone Health
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Mount Sinai South Nassau
Oceanside, New York, 11572, United States
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (12)
Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L, Czako L, Gyokeres T, Manes G, Meier P, Poley JW, Ponchon T, Tringali A, Bellisario C, Minozzi S, Senore C, Bennett C, Bretthauer M, Hassan C, Kaminski MF, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rees CJ, Spada C, Valori R, Bisschops R, Rutter MD. Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Dec;6(10):1448-1460. doi: 10.1177/2050640618808157. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
PMID: 30574315BACKGROUNDBaron, Kozarek, Carr-Locke, et al. ERCP 3rd Edition. Elsevier. 2019.
BACKGROUNDLee DH, Kim DB, Kim HY, Baek HS, Kwon SY, Lee MH, Park JC. Increasing potential risks of contamination from repetitive use of endoscope. Am J Infect Control. 2015 May 1;43(5):e13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
PMID: 25726130BACKGROUNDAlfa MJ, Olson N, DeGagne P, Jackson M. A survey of reprocessing methods, residual viable bioburden, and soil levels in patient-ready endoscopic retrograde choliangiopancreatography duodenoscopes used in Canadian centers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;23(4):198-206. doi: 10.1086/502035.
PMID: 12002234BACKGROUNDPetersen BT. Duodenoscope reprocessing: risk and options coming into view. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):484-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.07.004. No abstract available.
PMID: 26279349BACKGROUNDRoss AS, Baliga C, Verma P, Duchin J, Gluck M. A quarantine process for the resolution of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
PMID: 26092616BACKGROUNDUSA FDA: Medical Device Safety: Safety Communications. The FDA Continues to Remind Facilities of the Importance of Following Duodenoscope Reprocessing Instructions: FDA Safety Communication. 12 April 2019.
BACKGROUNDUSA FDA: Medical Device Safety: Safety Communications. The FDA is Recommending Transition to Duodenoscopes with Innovative Designs to Enhance Safety: FDA Safety Communication. 29 August 2019.
BACKGROUNDBalan GG, Rosca I, Ursu EL, Fifere A, Varganici CD, Doroftei F, Turin-Moleavin IA, Sandru V, Constantinescu G, Timofte D, Stefanescu G, Trifan A, Sfarti CV. Duodenoscope-Associated Infections beyond the Elevator Channel: Alternative Causes for Difficult Reprocessing. Molecules. 2019 Jun 25;24(12):2343. doi: 10.3390/molecules24122343.
PMID: 31242689BACKGROUNDCotton PB, Eisen G, Romagnuolo J, Vargo J, Baron T, Tarnasky P, Schutz S, Jacobson B, Bott C, Petersen B. Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):868-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.036. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
PMID: 21377673BACKGROUNDDumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
PMID: 31863440BACKGROUNDASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, Bruining DH, Eloubeidi MA, Fanelli RD, Faulx AL, Gurudu SR, Kothari S, Lightdale JR, Qumseya BJ, Shaukat A, Wang A, Wani SB, Yang J, DeWitt JM. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):32-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.051. Epub 2016 Aug 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 27546389BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Elizabeth Smith
Ambu Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2020
First Posted
November 16, 2020
Study Start
January 25, 2021
Primary Completion
January 27, 2022
Study Completion
February 28, 2022
Last Updated
August 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share