NCT04627844

Brief Summary

Trauma patients who require Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement for feeding and who consent to be in the study will be randomized to receive feeding at either 6 hours after PEG placement as is routinely done or at 0 hours after PEG placement.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Typical duration for phase_4

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2020

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 13, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 25, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 25, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 23, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Severe complication

    Number of patients with a complication requiring return to operating room

    Typically up to 4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Minor complication

    Through study completion, an expected average of one year

Study Arms (2)

Delayed Feeds

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patients will receive tube feeds beginning at 6 hours after PEG tube placement. This is our institutions current practice Intervention Type: Dietary

Dietary Supplement: Delayed Feeding

Immediate Feeds

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will receive tube feeds beginning immediately after PEG tube placement. Intervention Type: Dietary

Dietary Supplement: Immediate Feeding

Interventions

Immediate FeedingDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Standard tube feeds begun at an earlier time point

Immediate Feeds
Delayed FeedingDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Standard tube feeds begun at delayed time point

Delayed Feeds

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients who require PEG tube placement for feeding by the Trauma/Acute Care Surgery at our institution who are able to provide consent or whose legally authorized representative is able to provide consent for the patient.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients not receiving PEG placement
  • Patients receiving PEG tube placement by a member of a different hospital service
  • Patients under the age of 18 years old

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • Bechtold ML, Matteson ML, Choudhary A, Puli SR, Jiang PP, Roy PK. Early versus delayed feeding after placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2919-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02108.x. Epub 2008 Aug 21.

    PMID: 18721239BACKGROUND
  • Choudhry U, Barde CJ, Markert R, Gopalswamy N. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized prospective comparison of early and delayed feeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Aug;44(2):164-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70134-7.

    PMID: 8858322BACKGROUND
  • Cristian D, Poalelungi A, Anghel A, Burcos T, Grigore R, Bertesteanu S, Richiteanu G, Grama F; -. Prophylactic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) - The Importance of Nutritonal Support in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers (HNCs) or Neurogenic Dysphagia (ND). Chirurgia (Bucur). 2015 Mar-Apr;110(2):129-36.

    PMID: 26011834BACKGROUND
  • Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, Minard G, Tolley EA, Poret HA, Kuhl MR, Brown RO. Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Ann Surg. 1992 May;215(5):503-11; discussion 511-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199205000-00013.

    PMID: 1616387BACKGROUND
  • McCarter TL, Condon SC, Aguilar RC, Gibson DJ, Chen YK. Randomized prospective trial of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Mar;93(3):419-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00419.x.

    PMID: 9517650BACKGROUND
  • Rahnemai-Azar AA, Rahnemaiazar AA, Naghshizadian R, Kurtz A, Farkas DT. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7739-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7739.

    PMID: 24976711BACKGROUND
  • Szary NM, Arif M, Matteson ML, Choudhary A, Puli SR, Bechtold ML. Enteral feeding within three hours after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement: a meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;45(4):e34-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181eeb732.

    PMID: 20733512BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Andrew Lawson, DO

CONTACT

Chase J Wehrle, BA

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients will be randomized to receive feeding beginning at two time points.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, Trauma/Critical Care, General Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2020

First Posted

November 13, 2020

Study Start

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion

November 1, 2022

Study Completion

May 1, 2023

Last Updated

November 25, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share