NCT04623970

Brief Summary

The aims of this study were firstly, to evaluate the changes in the anxiety level after deep sedation with various intravenous sedative agents using salivary cortisol level in pediatric dental patients and secondly, to compare clinical effectiveness of this sedative agents, perioperative complications, recovery time and adverse effects.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
69

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 28, 2018

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 23, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 5, 2020

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 2, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 13, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

November 2, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 10, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Dental anxietyDeep SedationKetofolPropofolSalivary Cortisol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Dental anxiety (subjective)

    Units on a Scale (Patient's dental anxiety level was evaluated with Facial Image Scale after treatment. Patients signed from 1 to 5 score for dental anxiety.The data were collected and statistically analysed using by the numerical data. In this study, "1" and "2" scores are considered as better outcome. Patients who signed these scores described as no anxiety. The worst outcome is considered as the patients signed "4-5". Each scale range for each time interval evaluated as count of patient and presented as percentage.)

    through study completion, an average of 12 months

  • Dental anxiety (objective)

    Units on Saliva cortisol levels (Dental anxiety was evaluated with Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay after treatment.The patients were measured from 0 to 200 nmol/L for dental anxiety after the treatment.The data were collected and statistically analysed using by the numerical data. In this study, " 0-28 nmol/L'' are considered as better outcome. Patients who were have these scores described no dental anxiety for deep sedation. The worst outcome is considered as the anxious patients have "\>28 nmol/L ". Each value range for each time interval evaluated as count of patient and presented as percentage.)

    through study completion, an average of 12 months

  • Depth of sedation

    Units on a Scale (Depth of sedation was evaluated with Ramsay Sedation Scale during the sedation. Observer signed from 0 to 5 score for depth of sedation during the treatment.The data were collected and statistically analysed using by the numerical data. In this study, "4-5" scores are considered as better outcome. Patients who were signed these scores described as sedated patients for dental treatment. The worst outcome is considered as the patients signed "0-3". Each scale range for each time interval evaluated as count of patient and presented as percentage.)

    through study completion, an average of 12 months

  • Postperative complications

    Units on a Scale ( Postoperative complications were evaluated with a form which was included absence or presence of agitation, hypersalivation, nausea-vomiting and double vision. Observer signed absence or presence for each complications after the treatment.The data were collected and statistically analysed using by the numerical data)

    through study completion, an average of 12 months

  • Perioperative complications

    Units on a Scale (Perioperative complications were evaluated with a form which was included absence or presence of local injection pain, cough, saturation drop and spontaneous movement. Observer signed absence or presence for each perioperative complications during the deep sedation.The data were collected and statistically analysed using by the numerical data)

    through study completion, an average of 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Heart Rate

    through study completion, an average of 12 months

  • Systolic and diastolic arterial pressure

    through study completion, an average of 12 months

  • Oxygen saturation

    through study completion, an average of 12 months

Study Arms (3)

Propofol sedation group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in this experimental group received propofol sedation agent.

Procedure: Dental Treatment

Ketofol 1:3 sedation group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in this experimental group received ketofol sedation agent as a 1:3 mixture.

Procedure: Dental Treatment

Ketofol 1:4 sedation group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in this experimental group received ketofol sedation agent as a 1:4 mixture.

Procedure: Dental Treatment

Interventions

Comprehensive dental care (restorative treatmen, crowns, pulp therapy, fissure sealant and teeth extraction for pediatric patients under the deep sedation

Ketofol 1:3 sedation groupKetofol 1:4 sedation groupPropofol sedation group

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Years - 7 Years
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility Details35 Male and 34 Female
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Pediatric patients age between 3-7 years old
  • Having no systemic condition and ASA 1 healty status
  • Having high dental anxiety
  • Having no dental treatment under the sedation or general anesthesia before
  • Having no dental treatment before

You may not qualify if:

  • Having obstructed nasal passages, raised intracranial or intraocular pressure, allergy
  • Using any drug which effected saliva construction
  • Having enough saliva for saliva cortisol evaluation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cukurova University

Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Dental Care

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DentistryDental Health ServicesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • volkan Ciftci

    Cukurova University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2020

First Posted

November 10, 2020

Study Start

November 28, 2018

Primary Completion

January 23, 2020

Study Completion

October 5, 2020

Last Updated

November 13, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Locations