Validation of a 13C Glucose Breath Test Compared With the Euglycaemic Clamp Test
BRECLAIR
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Insulin resistance can be assessed by the euglycaemic clamp technique. To date, this is the golden standard, but it is not suited for clinical practice. A 13C glucose breath test will be tested as a valid alternative. The curve of the exhaled 13C CO2 as a function of glucose metabolism can be correlated to the curve of the glucose disposal rate obtained via the clamp technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2020
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2023
CompletedMarch 18, 2022
February 1, 2022
2.2 years
November 4, 2020
March 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Correlation of the 13C breath test with the golden standard
sensitivity and specificity analysis using linear regression
one day
Study Arms (2)
NAFLD+T1DM+
Subjects with type 1 diabetes and ultrasound-defined NAFLD
NAFLD-T1DM+
Subjects with type 1 diabetes without ultrasound-defined NAFLD
Interventions
clamp test (golden standard) to determine insulin resistance
13C glucose breath test to compare with the golden standard
Eligibility Criteria
Type 1 diabetes subjects from the research facility's outpatient clinic.
You may qualify if:
- Adult type 1 diabetes patients
- /50 subjects with confirmed NAFLD (using ultrasound criteria)
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
- gastric bypass surgery
- cirrhosis
- secondary cause of liver steatosis present
- any cause which makes a 4-hour clamp impossible
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Antwerp University Hospital
Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
Related Publications (5)
Hussain M, Jangorbhani M, Schuette S, Considine RV, Chisholm RL, Mather KJ. [13C]glucose breath testing provides a noninvasive measure of insulin resistance: calibration analyses against clamp studies. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Feb;16(2):102-12. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0151. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
PMID: 24116833BACKGROUNDMaldonado-Hernandez J, Martinez-Basila A, Salas-Fernandez A, Navarro-Betancourt JR, Pina-Aguero MI, Bernabe-Garcia M. The 13C-Glucose Breath Test for Insulin Resistance Assessment in Adolescents: Comparison with Fasting and Post-Glucose Stimulus Surrogate Markers of Insulin Resistance. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2016 Dec 1;8(4):419-424. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.3260. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
PMID: 27354200BACKGROUNDLewanczuk RZ, Paty BW, Toth EL. Comparison of the [13C]glucose breath test to the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp when determining insulin resistance. Diabetes Care. 2004 Feb;27(2):441-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2.441.
PMID: 14747226RESULTMertens J, Roosens L, Braspenning R, Vandebeeck J, Francque S, De Block C. The 13C Glucose Breath Test Accurately Identifies Insulin Resistance in People With Type 1 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Jan 21;110(2):e432-e442. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae175.
PMID: 38487831DERIVEDClinck I, Mertens J, Wouters K, Dirinck E, De Block C. Insulin Resistance and CGM-Derived Parameters in People With Type 1 Diabetes: Are They Associated? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Oct 15;109(11):e2131-e2140. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae015.
PMID: 38198792DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christophe De Block, Prof.
University Hospital, Antwerp
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2020
First Posted
November 10, 2020
Study Start
October 27, 2020
Primary Completion
December 30, 2022
Study Completion
March 31, 2023
Last Updated
March 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share