Intranasal Versus Intravenous Drug in Painful Procedure for Outpatient Oncologic Participants
NAIVe
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Midazolam and Ketamine in Sedation for Painful Outpatient Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain is a vital sign that depends on personal experience involving different factors such as previous sensory and emotional experience, age, spiritual and cultural aspects, that makes it harder to evaluate, especially in young children. Pain control is important to diminish the anxiety of the child and family, also this is more important in patients who require procedure and treatment that are more painful, like oncological and hematological patients. The study aims to measure if the intranasal drugs (dexmedetomidine and fentanyl) has the same outcomes when compared with intravenous drug (ketamine and midazolam), but with less side effects. The participants are patients from an oncologic outpatient, that will be submitted to cerebrospinal fluid puncture, myelogram or both will be randomized assigned to both groups. The study will compare physiological variables ( heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure) and sedation and pain scales to see if its work properly. The study purpose is to evaluate if intranasal drug works in the same way with less side effects comparing with the usual treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jun 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedApril 1, 2021
March 1, 2021
3 months
September 29, 2020
March 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Pain control
Evaluate if intranasal drugs is effective for pain relief in painful procedures for paediatric oncologic and hematologic patients. To measure it will use Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (FLACC). This is a scale for pain in children, and for each sign gives 0-2 point, and 0 is no pain and 7-10 intense pain
The FLACC scale will be measure each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes.
Sedation
Evaluate if intranasal drugs is effective for sedation in painful procedures for paediatric oncologic and hematologic patients. For access this, will be use Ramsay scale, this scale range between 1 to 6. 1 is a anxious patient and 6 sleeping patient without answer
The Ramsay scale will be measure each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes.
Change in heart rate
evaluate side effects using PALS ( paediatric advanced life support) values for ages. To evaluate this, heart rate values will be noted before the procedure, during and after that and will be evaluated if there was an increase or decrease in it, respecting a significance level of 5%.
each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes
Change in respiratory rate
evaluate side effects using PALS ( paediatric advanced life support) values for different ages. To evaluate this, respiratory rate values will be noted before the procedure, during and after that and will be evaluated if there was an increase or decrease in it, respecting a significance level of 5%.
each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes
Change in blood pressure
evaluate side effects using PALS ( paediatric advanced life support) values for ages. To evaluate this, blood pressure value will be noted before the procedure, during and after that and will be evaluated if there was an increase or decrease in it, respecting a significance level of 5%.
each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Comparison if intranasal drugs has the same pain relief as intravenous drugs
each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes
Comparison if intranasal drugs has the same sedation effects like intravenous drug
each 2 minutes after medication up to 30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
intranasal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl
EXPERIMENTALDexmedetomidine (precedex®) and fentanyl will be administered by intranasal routes, seeing if both sedative (dexmedetomidine) and analgesic (fentanyl) can give enough sedation for procedure
intravenous ketamine and midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORketamine (ketalar®) and midazolam intravenous will be using to compare the efficiency of intranasal drugs
Interventions
Dexmedetomidine (precedex®) will be administered by intranasal route in 1ug/kg each dose, repeating at most 3 times to see if it can give enough sedation to painful procedure. To assess the level of sedation the study will use Ramsay sedation scale.
Fentanyl will be administered by intranasal route in 1,5ug/kg each dose, repeating at most 3 times to see if it can give enough pain relief for painful procedure. To assess pain control the study will use Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale ( FLACC)
Ketamine (ketalar®) will be administrated by intravenous route in 1mg/kg dose and the study will use this drug to compare the efficiency of intranasal drugs.
Midazolam will be administrated by intravenous route in 0,1mg/kg dose and the study will use this drug to compare the efficiency of intranasal drugs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with oncohematological diseases that requires cerebrospinal fluid, myelogram or both for staging and monitoring their treatment ( leukemia, lymphoma, solid tumors and bone marrow aplasia)
- Patients who is undergoing to collect cerebrospinal fluid, myelogram or both;
- aged between two and eight years;
- absence of tumor recurrence.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous neurologic disease;
- Using of opioid previously;
- Neurological developmental delay
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ITACI - Instituto de Tratamento do Câncer Infantil/ ICR HCFMUSP
São Paulo, 05410-030, Brazil
Related Publications (8)
Manworren RC, Stinson J. Pediatric Pain Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2016 Aug;23(3):189-200. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
PMID: 27989326BACKGROUNDFantacci C, Fabrizio GC, Ferrara P, Franceschi F, Chiaretti A. Intranasal drug administration for procedural sedation in children admitted to pediatric Emergency Room. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):217-222. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201801_14120.
PMID: 29364490BACKGROUNDLi BL, Zhang N, Huang JX, Qiu QQ, Tian H, Ni J, Song XR, Yuen VM, Irwin MG. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children administered either by atomiser or by drops. Anaesthesia. 2016 May;71(5):522-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.13407. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
PMID: 26936022BACKGROUNDTug A, Hanci A, Turk HS, Aybey F, Isil CT, Sayin P, Oba S. Comparison of Two Different Intranasal Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Children for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation. Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Dec;17(6):479-85. doi: 10.1007/s40272-015-0145-1.
PMID: 26323489BACKGROUNDJun JH, Kim KN, Kim JY, Song SM. The effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Sep;64(9):947-961. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0917-x. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
PMID: 28639236BACKGROUNDGupta A, Dalvi NP, Tendolkar BA. Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam as premedication for brain magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: A prospective randomized double blind trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):236-240. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_204_16.
PMID: 28781452BACKGROUNDChatrath V, Kumar R, Sachdeva U, Thakur M. Intranasal Fentanyl, Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine as Premedication in Pediatric Patients. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):748-753. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_97_18.
PMID: 30283188BACKGROUNDKleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, Samson RA, Hazinski MF, Atkins DL, Berg MD, de Caen AR, Fink EL, Freid EB, Hickey RW, Marino BS, Nadkarni VM, Proctor LT, Qureshi FA, Sartorelli K, Topjian A, van der Jagt EW, Zaritsky AL. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S876-908. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971101. No abstract available.
PMID: 20956230BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2020
First Posted
November 9, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share