NCT04620707

Brief Summary

Stroke represents one of the main causes of adult disability and will be one of the main contributors to the burden of disease in 2030. However, the healthcare systems are not able to respond to the current demand let alone its future increase. There is a need to deploy new approaches that advance current rehabilitation methods and enhance their efficiency. One of the latest approaches used for the rehabilitation of a wide range of deficits of the nervous system is based on virtual reality (VR) applications, which combine training scenarios with dedicated interface devices such as the Rehabilitation Gaming System (RGS), a science-based ICT solution for neurorehabilitation combining brain theory, AI, cloud computing and virtual reality and targeting motor and cognitive recovery after stroke. RGS provides a continuum of evaluations and therapeutic solutions that accompany the patient from the clinic to the therapy centre. RGS has been clinically validated. However, in order to achieve significant benefits in the patients' QoL, it is essential that this technological solution becomes an at home solution providing training and 24/7 monitoring and care. For this reason, this project aims at investigating not only its clinical validity but also the RGS acceptability and adoption model. The findings derived from this study will contribute to establish a novel neurorehabilitation paradigm that can accelerate the recovery of hemiparetic stroke patients. Besides the clinical impact, such achievement could have relevant socioeconomic impact.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 9, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 9, 2020

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 4, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 4, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 3, 2026

Status Verified

November 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

November 3, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 28, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeFatigueRehabilitationPersonalizationeHealth

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Barthel Index (BI) [min=0, max =100]. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

    Changes from baseline to end of treatment (12 weeks)

    12 weeks

  • Barthel Index (BI) [min=0, max =100]. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

    Changes from baseline to follow up (6 months)

    6 months

  • Barthel Index (BI) [min=0, max =100]. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

    Changes from baseline to follow up (12 months)

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremities (FM-UE) [min=0, max=66]. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

    12 weeks

  • Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremities (FM-UE) [min=0, max=66]. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

    6 months

  • Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremities (FM-UE) [min=0, max=66]. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

    12 months

  • CAHAI [min=13, max=91]. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

    12 weeks

  • CAHAI [min=13, max=91]. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

    12 months

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Number of falls reported by the participants.

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

RGS based therapy

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: RGS based training and monitoring

Treatment as usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Therapy as usual

Interventions

The RGS treatment will consist in a variable number of sessions per week of RGS-based training. Each session consists of cognitive and motor training involving reaching, grasping, placing virtual objects. The duration of the training period will be variable. Patients will use the RGS@Clinic from admission to discharge, and will have the RGS@Home during the first 3 months of the outpatient stage after recruitment. After this period of time, the patient will be evaluated by clinicians and the RGS@Home system will be collected. The RGS-Wear will be kept by the patient also during the follow-up period, up to 1 year post-recruitment.

RGS based therapy

The patients will follow treatment as usual, including conventional rehabilitation and physical therapy when corresponding. The exact treatment that the patients will receive will depend on the local medical guidelines.

Treatment as usual

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients presenting a first-ever ischemic or intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke.
  • A CT SCAN and/or MRI had exclude other pathologies.
  • Lesion localization by clinical symptoms/signs.
  • Moderate to mild proximal upper limb motor impairment (MRC≥2).
  • Age 20-85 years old.
  • Able to sit on a chair or a wheelchair interacting with the RGS during a full session, and be capable and willing to participate in RGS therapy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
  • Severe cognitive capabilities that prevent the execution of the experiment (MoCA \< 19). This cut-off score is based on pilot study (Maier, M. et al, 2019).
  • Arteriovenous malformation or lesions not related with a stroke.
  • Severe associated impairment such as spasticity, communication disabilities (sensorial, Wernicke aphasia or apraxia), major pain or other neuromuscular impairments or orthopedic devices that would interfere with the correct execution of the experiment (Modified Ashworth Scale \< 3).
  • Unable to use the RGS independently according to the therapist's observations and lacking support from a caregiver to use the RGS.
  • Refusal to sign the consent form.
  • Pre-stroke history of upper limb motor disability.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Miguel Hernandez - Specs Lab

Elche, Alicante, 03202, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Mura A, Maier M, Ballester BR, De la Torre Costa J, Lopez-Luque J, Gelineau A, Mandigout S, Ghatan PH, Fiorillo R, Antenucci F, Coolen T, Chivite I, Callen A, Landais H, Gomez OI, Melero C, Brandi S, Domenech M, Daviet JC, Zucca R, Verschure PFMJ. Bringing rehabilitation home with an e-health platform to treat stroke patients: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial (RGS@home). Trials. 2022 Jun 20;23(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06444-0.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeParesisFatigue

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Fellow

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2020

First Posted

November 9, 2020

Study Start

November 9, 2020

Primary Completion

August 4, 2023

Study Completion

August 4, 2023

Last Updated

September 3, 2026

Record last verified: 2021-11

Locations