Accuracy of VABB Elite 10G Versus BARD 14G CNB
Accuracy of Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy Elite 10G Versus BARD 14G Core Needle Biopsy of Abnormal Breast Lesions.
1 other identifier
interventional
1,470
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, patients whose breast ultrasound showed a space-occupying lesion and needed biopsy to clarify the pathology were selected as the research subjects. This study aims to determine whether Vacuum-assisted biopsy device Elite is superior to the traditional BARD ejection type air core needle in the diagnosis of breast cancer through a prospective randomized study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 breast-cancer
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedSeptember 14, 2021
September 1, 2021
1.2 years
September 14, 2020
September 10, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy
The accuracy of the puncture pathology was defined as the proportion of patients in the study population who were consistent with the qualitative diagnosis of the puncture pathology and surgical pathology.When the pathological diagnosis of puncture is "carcinoma in situ of the catheter", if the pathological diagnosis of the catheter is "carcinoma in situ of the catheter with microinfiltration", the puncture is considered accurate;If the surgical pathology confirms "invasive cancer (infiltrating lesion \>1mm)", the pathology of the puncture is considered inaccurate (ie, underestimated)
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Concordance of immunohistochemical marker status
3 months
Sensitivity
3 months
Negative Prediction Value
3 months
Underestimation Rate
3 months
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
7 days
Study Arms (2)
VABB Elite 10G
EXPERIMENTALVacuum-assisted Elite 10G
BARD 14G CNB
ACTIVE COMPARATORBARD 14G Core needle
Interventions
If the biopsy device is a vacuum-assisted Elite 10G needle, insert the needle groove into the mass and rotate to cut the biopsy tissue one circle
If the biopsy device is a BARD 14G hollow core needle, insert the needle to the edge of the mass and pull the trigger in different directions to eject the needle to retrieve the material
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Over 18 years old (including 18 years old)
- Ultrasound examination indicates the presence of space-occupying lesions in the breast. The size, location, and BI-RADS classification are not limited.
- Agree to undergo surgery after puncture
- Ability and willingness to sign informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- A biopsy has been performed in the external hospital
- Contraindications for puncture or surgery such as severe coagulation dysfunction
- Refuse breast surgery
- Axillary lymph node puncture
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fudan Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Shanghai, China
Related Publications (1)
Zhang Y, Li J, Mo M, Shen J, Ren H, Li S, Liu G, Shao Z. The comparison of efficacy and safety evaluation of vacuum-assisted Elite 10-G system and the traditional BARD 14-G core needle in breast diagnosis: an open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2023 May 1;109(5):1180-1187. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000257.
PMID: 37042316DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Junjie Li, MD
Fudan University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ying Zhang, MD
Fudan University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2020
First Posted
November 3, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
September 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share