Preoperative and Peroperative Comparison Between 3D Spine Reconstructions
Spine-PDCA-OR
Comparison of Preoperative 3D Spine Reconstruction With the EOS System and Peroperative 3D Spine Reconstruction With SURGIVISIO
2 other identifiers
observational
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective is to collect data from a per-operative navigation system called SURGIVISIO during scoliosis surgeries. A research program is in progress in order super-impose pre-operative 3D reconstructions of the spine performed with the EOS system on the per-operative 3D reconstructions performed with the SURGIVISIO system. The purpose of the study is to collect the pre and per operatives data in order to perform the research and development program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jul 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedNovember 2, 2020
October 1, 2020
1.3 years
July 30, 2020
October 26, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison between the shape of of the spine in supine position in the OR with the Surgivisio system and the 3D shape with the 3D pre-operative planning with the EOS
Comparison in degrees of the pre-operative Cobb angle with the EOS system and the per-operative spine reconstruction with the Surgivisio System.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Vertebrae automatic segmentation in 3D and 2D
1 year
Automatic identification of the vertebrae
1 year
Evaluation of respiratory movements on image quality
1 year
Evaluation of the "recalage" accuracy between preop planning and CBCT perop.
1 year
Evaluation of angular measurements between preop and perop images
1 year
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Each patient will undergo a spine fusion for a evolutive idiopathic scoliosis with the help of the surgivisio system.
Eligibility Criteria
This study will involve only patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis planned for a fusion surgery
You may qualify if:
- patients aged between 12 and 20
- Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
- Fusion surgery planned
You may not qualify if:
- Patient under "tutelle" or privation of liberty
- Opposition of parents or patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chu Grenoble Alpes
Grenoble, 38043, France
Related Publications (9)
Dubousset J. Scoliosis and its pathophysiology: do we understand it? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 May 1;26(9):1001. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200105010-00002. No abstract available.
PMID: 11337615BACKGROUNDWeinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 2008 May 3;371(9623):1527-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3.
PMID: 18456103BACKGROUNDCourvoisier A, Garin C, Vialle R, Kohler R. The change on vertebral axial rotation after posterior instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015 Dec;31(12):2325-31. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2891-3. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
PMID: 26337699BACKGROUNDMerloz P, Tonetti J, Cinquin P, Lavallee S, Troccaz J, Pittet L. [Computer-assisted surgery: automated screw placement in the vertebral pedicle]. Chirurgie. 1998 Nov;123(5):482-90. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4001(99)80077-4. French.
PMID: 9882919BACKGROUNDMerloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavallee S, Troccaz J, Cinquin P, Sautot P. Computer-assisted spine surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3(6):297-305. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1998)3:63.0.CO;2-8.
PMID: 10379979BACKGROUNDMerloz P, Troccaz J, Vouaillat H, Vasile C, Tonetti J, Eid A, Plaweski S. Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007 Oct;221(7):813-20. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM268.
PMID: 18019467BACKGROUNDProd'homme M, Cavalie G, Kerschbaumer G, Valmary-Degano S, Boudissa M, Tonetti J. T1 Vertebra Pedicular Osteoid Osteoma: Minimally Invasive Surgical Resection Aided by New Integrated Navigation to 3D Imaging Device. Case Rep Orthop. 2019 Mar 18;2019:7626454. doi: 10.1155/2019/7626454. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31011459BACKGROUNDFerrero E, Mazda K, Simon AL, Ilharreborde B. Preliminary experience with SpineEOS, a new software for 3D planning in AIS surgery. Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(9):2165-2174. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5591-3. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
PMID: 29693200BACKGROUNDStindel E, Merloz P, Graf P, Massin P, Gruber P, Robert H, Moineau G, Colmar M. [Computer assisted orthopedics surgery]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 Jun;93(4 Suppl):2S11-32. French.
PMID: 17646826BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aurélien Courvoisier, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Grenoble
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2020
First Posted
November 2, 2020
Study Start
July 30, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
November 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share