Dynamic Myofascial Release in Patients With Non-specific Neck Pain.
Effects of Dynamic Myofascial Release in Patients With Non-specific Neck Pain.
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dynamic myofascial release is similar to joint mobilization (active physiological movements) to increase ROM with the myofascial release for fascia release. It differs from myofascial release in a way that it is a dynamic approach in which the patient is actively involved. In 2019 study was conducted on the effects of Dynamic myofascial release showing significant increase in all trunk ROMs and functional reach test in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. To summarize, this study will going to see the effectiveness of dynamic myofascial release by addressing both fascia and active physiological movements and see the response of patient's pain level, cervical ROM, improvement in the ability to manage in activities of daily life. Furthermore this study helps to find out its effectiveness and its clinical importance in treating patients with neck pain, considering its significance of engaging multiple structures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2020
CompletedDecember 22, 2020
December 1, 2020
1.1 years
October 9, 2020
December 21, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numeric pain rating scale
The NPRS can be administered verbally or graphically for self-completion. The respondent is asked to indicate the numeric value on the segmented scale that best describes their pain intensity. High test-retest reliability has been observed (r = 0.96 and 0.95, respectively with minimum score 0 to maximum 10
2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Inclinometer
2 weeks
Neck Disability Index
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Traditional physical therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORCervical isometrics and Muscle Stretching
Dynamic myofascial release
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group was given Dynamic myofascial release along with the cervical isometrics and muscle stretching
Interventions
* Hot pack for 10 minutes * TENS for 10 minutes * Trigger point release if any found. * Myofascial release * Home plan for stretching exercises will be prescribed to the patient. Receive two weeks intervention plan, three sessions per week.
DMFR involves a manual application of low amplitude, long duration stretch to the fascia and muscle. Participants were instructed to relax as much as possible, and the therapist proceeded to smoothly move the joints in a diagonal or horizontal direction at a slow rate within the ROM. The therapist repeatedly pushed, pulled, or shook the joint area about three to five times for about 3 seconds with slight motion at the end of ROM. Conventional therapy will includes * Hot pack for 10 minutes * TENS for 10 minutes * Trigger point release if any found. * Myofascial release * Home plan for stretching exercises will be prescribed to the patient. Receive two weeks intervention plan, three sessions per week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants had a complaint of non-specific pain in the neck with duration of at least 3 weeks.
- The area of neck pain was defined to the cervical Region, with or without radiating to head or arms.
- Patients with tight upper trapezius or levator scapulae or both with or without the presence of myofascial trigger points.
You may not qualify if:
- NP due to traumatism, fractures, or whiplash;
- Neoplasia, severe osteoporosis, infectious, or inflammatory processes.
- Ppatient's with pacemakers, congenital anomalies, previous neck surgery, or pregnancy.
- Patients who had received MRT in the previous month.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maroof International Hospital
Islamabad, Fedral,Pakistan, 44000, Pakistan
Related Publications (8)
Cerezo-Tellez E, Torres-Lacomba M, Mayoral-Del Moral O, Sanchez-Sanchez B, Dommerholt J, Gutierrez-Ortega C. Prevalence of Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study. Pain Med. 2016 Dec;17(12):2369-2377. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw114. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
PMID: 28025371BACKGROUNDMcLean SM, May S, Klaber-Moffett J, Sharp DM, Gardiner E. Risk factors for the onset of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Jul;64(7):565-72. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.090720. Epub 2010 May 12.
PMID: 20466711BACKGROUNDAjimsha MS, Al-Mudahka NR, Al-Madzhar JA. Effectiveness of myofascial release: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015 Jan;19(1):102-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
PMID: 25603749BACKGROUNDRodriguez-Huguet M, Lomas-Vega R. Response to the Letter to the Editor on "Effects of Myofascial Release on Pressure Pain Thresholds in Patients With Neck Pain: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial". Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;98(1):e4-e5. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000986. No abstract available.
PMID: 29912003BACKGROUNDArguisuelas MD, Lison JF, Sanchez-Zuriaga D, Martinez-Hurtado I, Domenech-Fernandez J. Effects of Myofascial Release in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 May 1;42(9):627-634. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001897.
PMID: 28441294BACKGROUNDCathcart E, McSweeney T, Johnston R, Young H, Edwards DJ. Immediate biomechanical, systemic, and interoceptive effects of myofascial release on the thoracic spine: A randomised controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jan;23(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
PMID: 30691766BACKGROUNDFerraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1990 Aug;17(8):1022-4.
PMID: 2213777BACKGROUNDHawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.
PMID: 22588748BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shafaq Shahid, MSPT(OMPT)
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2020
First Posted
October 30, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 20, 2020
Study Completion
December 20, 2020
Last Updated
December 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share