Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of a Novel SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Antigen Detection Test
COVID-VIRO
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The current prospective study was designed to assess the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of a novel antigen-based rapid detection test (COVID-VIRO®) on nasopharyngeal specimens in comparison to the reference test in a real-life setting
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable covid19
Started Oct 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2020
CompletedDecember 7, 2020
December 1, 2020
4 days
October 28, 2020
December 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of COVID VIRO® diagnostic specificity
COVID-VIRO® specificity is calculated using the RT-qPCR results as reference test, according to the following formulas: Specificity (%) = 100 x \[Negative / (Negative + Positive)\]
Month 1
Evaluation of COVID VIRO® diagnostic sensitivity
COVID-VIRO® sensitivity is calculated using the RT-qPCR results as reference test, according to the following formulas: Sensitivity (%) = 100 x \[Positive/ (Positive + Negative)\]
Month 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of COVID VIRO® diagnostic sensitivity for RT-qPCR Cycle threshold value < or > 28
Month 1
Study Arms (1)
Comparison between RT-qPCR and COVID-VIRO® results on nasopharyngeal swab specimens
EXPERIMENTALTwo concurrent nasopharyngeal swab specimens are collected for each participant. Comparison between RT-qPCR and COVID-VIRO® results of RT-qPCR positive patients is used to assess COVID-VIRO® sensitivity. Conversely, comparison between RT-qPCR and COVID-VIRO® results of RT-qPCR negative patients is used to assess COVID-VIRO® specificity.
Interventions
Two concurrent nasopharyngeal swab specimens are collected for each participant. Comparison between RT-qPCR and COVID-VIRO® results of RT-qPCR positive patients is used to assess COVID-VIRO® sensitivity. Conversely, comparison between RT-qPCR and COVID-VIRO® results of RT-qPCR negative patients is used to assess COVID-VIRO® specificity.
Two concurrent nasopharyngeal swab specimens are collected for each participant. Comparison between RT-qPCR and COVID-VIRO® results of RT-qPCR positive patients is used to assess COVID-VIRO® sensitivity. Conversely, comparison between RT-qPCR and COVID-VIRO® results of RT-qPCR negative patients is used to assess COVID-VIRO® specificity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (\>18 years old) already having a SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR positive result within 5 days
- Adult patients (\>18 years old) requiring a SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR on nasopharyngeal swab specimen for any reason
You may not qualify if:
- Patients non wishing to participate
- Under guardianship or curatorship or safeguard of justice patients
- Inability to join the hospital other than by public transport
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, France
Orléans, 45000, France
Related Publications (2)
Drame M, Tabue Teguo M, Proye E, Hequet F, Hentzien M, Kanagaratnam L, Godaert L. Should RT-PCR be considered a gold standard in the diagnosis of COVID-19? J Med Virol. 2020 Nov;92(11):2312-2313. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25996. Epub 2020 Jul 14. No abstract available.
PMID: 32383182BACKGROUNDZitek T. The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19. West J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 13;21(3):470-472. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47370.
PMID: 32302278BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thierry PRAZUCK, Dr
CHR ORLEANS
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2020
First Posted
October 30, 2020
Study Start
October 13, 2020
Primary Completion
October 17, 2020
Study Completion
October 17, 2020
Last Updated
December 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share