Efficacy of Surgical Diathermy in Eradicating Cutibacterium Acnes From Surgical Skin Incision During Shoulder Arthroplasty
Electrocautery
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Periprosthetic infection following shoulder arthroplasty is a devastating complication. Diagnosing and treating periprosthetic shoulder infection poses a significant challenge. At the forefront of this issue is Cutibacterium acnes because the current prophylactic regimens are insufficient to eradicate C acnes from the surgical field. It is believed that C acnes infections occur during surgery when the sebaceous glands in the skin are cut and exposed, leading to C acnes contaminating the surgeon's instruments and gloves and, thus, the surgical wound. The purpose of this study is to examine if making skin incisions using electrocautery will result in decreased C acnes contamination during shoulder arthroplasty. To this end, we propose a randomized clinical trial where patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty are randomized into two groups - Electrocautery incision group (Electro) vs. Scalpel incision group (Scalpel) - and swab cultures are obtained from the skin incision and operating surgeon's gloves and forceps
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedApril 11, 2023
April 1, 2023
1.4 years
October 25, 2020
April 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportions of positive C acnes cultures
Proportions of positive C acnes cultures
2 weeks following surgery
Study Arms (2)
Scalpel incision group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group of patients will receive skin incision made with use of a scalpel blade.
Electrocautery incision group
EXPERIMENTALThis group of patients will receive skin incision made with use of electrocautery.
Interventions
Using surgical diathermy to make skin incision during shoulder arthroplasty
Using scaple blade to make skin incision during shoulder arthroplasty
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult male patients (\>18 years old) who undergo primary shoulder arthroplasty (either anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty)
You may not qualify if:
- History of ipsilateral shoulder postoperative infection
- Administration of any antibiotics within a month prior to the index procedure
- Active acne at the surgical site
- History of psoriatic or eczematous lesions about the shoulder area
- Revision arthroplasty cases
- Minors (\< 18 years old)
- Female patients
- Prisoners
- Patients who cannot understand English enough to give an informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States
Related Publications (10)
Padegimas EM, Maltenfort M, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Parvizi J, Namdari S. Periprosthetic shoulder infection in the United States: incidence and economic burden. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 May;24(5):741-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.044. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
PMID: 25595360BACKGROUNDvan Diek FM, Pruijn N, Spijkers KM, Mulder B, Kosse NM, Dorrestijn O. The presence of Cutibacterium acnes on the skin of the shoulder after the use of benzoyl peroxide: a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomized trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Apr;29(4):768-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.027.
PMID: 32197765BACKGROUNDForuria AM, Fox TJ, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Clinical meaning of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in revision shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 May;22(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
PMID: 22981448BACKGROUNDAchermann Y, Sahin F, Schwyzer HK, Kolling C, Wust J, Vogt M. Characteristics and outcome of 16 periprosthetic shoulder joint infections. Infection. 2013 Jun;41(3):613-20. doi: 10.1007/s15010-012-0360-4. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
PMID: 23124880BACKGROUNDHorneff JG 3rd, Hsu JE, Voleti PB, O'Donnell J, Huffman GR. Propionibacterium acnes infection in shoulder arthroscopy patients with postoperative pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jun;24(6):838-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.03.008.
PMID: 25979553BACKGROUNDFalconer TM, Baba M, Kruse LM, Dorrestijn O, Donaldson MJ, Smith MM, Figtree MC, Hudson BJ, Cass B, Young AA. Contamination of the Surgical Field with Propionibacterium acnes in Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 19;98(20):1722-1728. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01133.
PMID: 27869623BACKGROUNDLy J, Mittal A, Windsor J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision. Br J Surg. 2012 May;99(5):613-20. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8708. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
PMID: 22367850BACKGROUNDIsmail A, Abushouk AI, Elmaraezy A, Menshawy A, Menshawy E, Ismail M, Samir E, Khaled A, Zakarya H, El-Tonoby A, Ghanem E. Cutting electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2017 Dec;220:147-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.093. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
PMID: 29180177BACKGROUNDKearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, McNamara DA, Deasy J. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2001 Jan;88(1):41-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x.
PMID: 11136307BACKGROUNDHemsell DL, Hemsell PG, Nobles B, Johnson ER, Little BB, Heard M. Abdominal wound problems after hysterectomy with electrocautery vs. scalpel subcutaneous incision. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1993;1(1):27-31. doi: 10.1155/S1064744993000079.
PMID: 18476202BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2020
First Posted
October 29, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to share IPD with other researchers