Impact of Computer-aided Optical Diagnosis (CAD) in Predicting Histology of Diminutive Rectosigmoid Polyps: a Multicenter Prospective Trial (ABC Study).
ABC
1 other identifier
observational
1,134
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recently, a CNN-based artificial intelligence (AI) system for polyp characterization has been developed by Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan. It works in conjunction with BLI system. In the present study we prospectively evaluate whether the evaluation of the endoscopist combined with the CAD system output achieve \> 90% accuracy in characterization (i.e. as adenomas or non-adenomas) of diminutive rectosigmoid polyps having histopathology as reference standard. Consecutive adult outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy, in which at least one diminutive (\<5 mm) rectosigmoid polyp is detected are included. During endoscopic procedures all polyps identified by the endoscopist are documented for size, location and morphology. All diminutive polyps are characterized by a three sequential steps process: I) endoscopist prediction: the endoscopist evaluates the polyp by using BLI through the BASIC classification; the confidence level (high vs. low) in histology prediction is recorded; II) AI prediction: the AI system is switched on and the output of the automatic evaluation is recorded; this outcome is rated as stable or unstable, depending of the consistency over time of the outcome; III) combined prediction: a final classification is provided by endoscopist in light of the results of the first and of the second step; the confidence level is recorded. All polyps are resected and retrieved in separate jars and sent for pathology assessment. Only polyps characterized with high confidence will be included in the per-polyp analysis; the high-confidence characterization rate will be also calculated; the rate of polyps characterized with a CAD stable outcome will be calculated. Operative characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy) in distinguishing adenomatous from non-adenomatous polyps, evaluated with high confidence, will be calculated for each diminutive polyp and for each diminutive rectosigmoid polyp, having histopathology report as reference standard. The post-polypectomy surveillance intervals will be calculated on the basis of polyp histology (reference standard) in all patients according to both USMSTF and ESGE guidelines.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2021
CompletedJune 10, 2021
June 1, 2021
4 months
October 22, 2020
June 9, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Agreement of combined prediction with PIVI I statement
To prospectively evaluate whether the evaluation of the endoscopist combined with the CAD system output achieve \> 90% accuracy in characterization (i.e. as adenomas or non-adenomas) of diminutive rectosigmoid polyps (i.e. PIVI I threshold) having histopathology as reference standard.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Endoscopist prediction
6 months
Ai prediction
6 months
Agreement of combined prediction with PIVI II statement
6 months
Study Arms (1)
Patients with at least one diminutive rectosigmoid polyp
Consecutive adult (\>18 years) outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy, in which at least one diminutive (\<5 mm) rectosigmoid polyp is detected. Exclusion criteria: * patients with CRC history or hereditary polyposis syndromes or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer * patients with inadequate bowel preparation * patients in which caecal intubation was not achieved or scheduled for partial examinations * polyps could not be resected due to ongoing anticoagulation preventing resection and pathologic assessment * patients undergoing urgent colonoscopy.
Interventions
A polyp characterization (adenoma vs. non adenoma) is provided by endoscopist in light of the results of this own evaluation and of the Ai system output. The confidence level (high vs. low) in polyp characterization is recorded. The combined evaluation is compared with histopathology results.
Eligibility Criteria
Consecutive adult outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy, in which at least one diminutive (\<5 mm) rectosigmoid polyp is detected
You may qualify if:
- Consecutive adult outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy, in which at least one diminutive (\<5 mm) rectosigmoid polyp is detected.
You may not qualify if:
- patients with CRC history or hereditary polyposis syndromes or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer
- patients with inadequate bowel preparation
- patients scheduled for partial examinations
- polyps could not be resected due to ongoing anticoagulation preventing resection and pathologic assessment
- patients undergoing urgent colonoscopy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Valduce Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital
Como, 22100, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Rondonotti E, Hassan C, Tamanini G, Antonelli G, Andrisani G, Leonetti G, Paggi S, Amato A, Scardino G, Di Paolo D, Mandelli G, Lenoci N, Terreni N, Andrealli A, Maselli R, Spadaccini M, Galtieri PA, Correale L, Repici A, Di Matteo FM, Ambrosiani L, Filippi E, Sharma P, Radaelli F. Artificial intelligence-assisted optical diagnosis for the resect-and-discard strategy in clinical practice: the Artificial intelligence BLI Characterization (ABC) study. Endoscopy. 2023 Jan;55(1):14-22. doi: 10.1055/a-1852-0330. Epub 2022 May 13.
PMID: 35562098DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Gastroenterology Unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2020
First Posted
October 28, 2020
Study Start
October 22, 2020
Primary Completion
February 27, 2021
Study Completion
March 30, 2021
Last Updated
June 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share