NCT04607083

Brief Summary

Recently, a CNN-based artificial intelligence (AI) system for polyp characterization has been developed by Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan. It works in conjunction with BLI system. In the present study we prospectively evaluate whether the evaluation of the endoscopist combined with the CAD system output achieve \> 90% accuracy in characterization (i.e. as adenomas or non-adenomas) of diminutive rectosigmoid polyps having histopathology as reference standard. Consecutive adult outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy, in which at least one diminutive (\<5 mm) rectosigmoid polyp is detected are included. During endoscopic procedures all polyps identified by the endoscopist are documented for size, location and morphology. All diminutive polyps are characterized by a three sequential steps process: I) endoscopist prediction: the endoscopist evaluates the polyp by using BLI through the BASIC classification; the confidence level (high vs. low) in histology prediction is recorded; II) AI prediction: the AI system is switched on and the output of the automatic evaluation is recorded; this outcome is rated as stable or unstable, depending of the consistency over time of the outcome; III) combined prediction: a final classification is provided by endoscopist in light of the results of the first and of the second step; the confidence level is recorded. All polyps are resected and retrieved in separate jars and sent for pathology assessment. Only polyps characterized with high confidence will be included in the per-polyp analysis; the high-confidence characterization rate will be also calculated; the rate of polyps characterized with a CAD stable outcome will be calculated. Operative characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy) in distinguishing adenomatous from non-adenomatous polyps, evaluated with high confidence, will be calculated for each diminutive polyp and for each diminutive rectosigmoid polyp, having histopathology report as reference standard. The post-polypectomy surveillance intervals will be calculated on the basis of polyp histology (reference standard) in all patients according to both USMSTF and ESGE guidelines.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,134

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 22, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 22, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 28, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 27, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 10, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

October 22, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 9, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Agreement of combined prediction with PIVI I statement

    To prospectively evaluate whether the evaluation of the endoscopist combined with the CAD system output achieve \> 90% accuracy in characterization (i.e. as adenomas or non-adenomas) of diminutive rectosigmoid polyps (i.e. PIVI I threshold) having histopathology as reference standard.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Endoscopist prediction

    6 months

  • Ai prediction

    6 months

  • Agreement of combined prediction with PIVI II statement

    6 months

Study Arms (1)

Patients with at least one diminutive rectosigmoid polyp

Consecutive adult (\>18 years) outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy, in which at least one diminutive (\<5 mm) rectosigmoid polyp is detected. Exclusion criteria: * patients with CRC history or hereditary polyposis syndromes or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer * patients with inadequate bowel preparation * patients in which caecal intubation was not achieved or scheduled for partial examinations * polyps could not be resected due to ongoing anticoagulation preventing resection and pathologic assessment * patients undergoing urgent colonoscopy.

Diagnostic Test: Polyp carachterization by combing endoscopist evaluation and Ai output

Interventions

A polyp characterization (adenoma vs. non adenoma) is provided by endoscopist in light of the results of this own evaluation and of the Ai system output. The confidence level (high vs. low) in polyp characterization is recorded. The combined evaluation is compared with histopathology results.

Patients with at least one diminutive rectosigmoid polyp

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Consecutive adult outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy, in which at least one diminutive (\<5 mm) rectosigmoid polyp is detected

You may qualify if:

  • Consecutive adult outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy, in which at least one diminutive (\<5 mm) rectosigmoid polyp is detected.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with CRC history or hereditary polyposis syndromes or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer
  • patients with inadequate bowel preparation
  • patients scheduled for partial examinations
  • polyps could not be resected due to ongoing anticoagulation preventing resection and pathologic assessment
  • patients undergoing urgent colonoscopy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital

Como, 22100, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Rondonotti E, Hassan C, Tamanini G, Antonelli G, Andrisani G, Leonetti G, Paggi S, Amato A, Scardino G, Di Paolo D, Mandelli G, Lenoci N, Terreni N, Andrealli A, Maselli R, Spadaccini M, Galtieri PA, Correale L, Repici A, Di Matteo FM, Ambrosiani L, Filippi E, Sharma P, Radaelli F. Artificial intelligence-assisted optical diagnosis for the resect-and-discard strategy in clinical practice: the Artificial intelligence BLI Characterization (ABC) study. Endoscopy. 2023 Jan;55(1):14-22. doi: 10.1055/a-1852-0330. Epub 2022 May 13.

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Gastroenterology Unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2020

First Posted

October 28, 2020

Study Start

October 22, 2020

Primary Completion

February 27, 2021

Study Completion

March 30, 2021

Last Updated

June 10, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations