Peak Inspiratory Flow and Dry Powder Inhaler Performance in COPD
Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF) and Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) Performance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine whether PIF is clinically important when using the Ellipta DPI device. In addition, the study will validate the best/most clinically appropriate way to perform a PIF maneuver, to determine the testing capabilities of the preferred PIF maneuver and to relate this PIF measurement to meaningful clinical outcomes in COPD patients
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Dec 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 8, 2023
CompletedMay 8, 2023
December 1, 2020
1 year
October 19, 2020
January 16, 2023
May 4, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
DPI Responder Analysis in Patients With Suboptimal PIF (<60 L/Min)
Outcome = the number of subject test days (2 test days per subject) meeting responder criteria defined as: DPI Responder - a positive (\>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy Ellipta® DPI with a negative (\<50mL) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy) DPI Partial Responder a positive (\>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy® Ellipta DPI with a positive (\>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy) DPI Failure - a negative (\<50mL) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy Ellipta® DPI with a positive (\>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy) Irreversible - a negative (\<50mL) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy Ellipta® DPI with a negative (\<50mL) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy)
2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
DPI Responder Analysis in Patients With Reduced PIF (<45 L/Min)
2 weeks
PIF Measurement Techniques
Baseline on day of testing
Study Arms (1)
Open label treatment
OTHERAll subjects receive Trelegy and Ventolin for 2 weeks
Interventions
Administration of Trelegy in all patients
2 hours after the administration of Trelegy, administer Ventolin in all patients
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- smoking history \>10 pack years
- pre-bronchodilator FEV1 \<60% predicted
- post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC \<70%
- female participants are eligible to participate if they are not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies:
- not a woman of childbearing potential OR
- agree to follow the contraceptive guidance during the treatment period and until the safety follow-up contact after the last dose of study treatment
- stratification requiring at least 1/3 of patients having a PIF of \< 60L/min (AM pre-dose based on using the level 2 InCheck Dial resistance setting with a sharp maximal effort starting after exhaling fully)
You may not qualify if:
- any subject with unstable disease, including
- COPD exacerbation in the last 6 weeks
- upper respiratory tract in in the last 4 weeks
- COPD or upper respiratory tract infection during run-in (subjects may be re-screened x 1 when stable after an acute event)
- pulmonary disease other than COPD
- any lung resection
- unstable cardiac conditions (at the discretion of the investigator)
- other unstable medical conditions (at the discretion of the investigator)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48336, United States
Related Publications (1)
Perugini V, Rhee CK, Moon JY, Pei Yee T, Ra SW, Pirina P, Yoo KH, Navarrete BA, Gouder C, Pacheco A, Navarro-Rolon A, Harlander M, Lapperre T, Loh SCH, Fole D, Naval E, Palacios PJR, Miravitlles M, Usmani O. Assessment of peak inspiratory flow in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicentre, observational, prospective, real-life study. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Sep 25;12(1):e002408. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002408.
PMID: 40998461DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
No primary information was available to derive power calculations to estimate the number of subjects needed to test the study hypothesis
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gary T Ferguson, M.D.
- Organization
- PRISM
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gary T Ferguson, MD
Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2020
First Posted
October 28, 2020
Study Start
December 2, 2020
Primary Completion
December 15, 2021
Study Completion
December 15, 2021
Last Updated
May 8, 2023
Results First Posted
May 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share