Comparative Study of MCCE With/Without Tether vs Conventional Upper Endoscopy in Patients With Upper Abdominal Symptoms
A Prospective Single Blinded, Pilot Study, Comparing a Magnetically Controlled Capsule With or Without a Tether (MCC or MCC-T) With Conventional Upper Endoscopy for the Diagnosis of Patients With Upper Abdominal Symptoms
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A prospective single blinded, tandem study, comparing a magnetically controlled capsule with or without a tether (MCC or MCC-T) with conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of patients with upper abdominal symptoms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 27, 2026
CompletedMay 27, 2026
May 1, 2026
5 months
October 8, 2020
April 29, 2024
May 24, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Compare Total Number of Lesions Identified Via MCCE Versus EGD
A count of the cumulative total number of lesions identified by the MCCE procedure versus a count of the cumulative total number of lesions identified by the EGD procedure.
Day of EGD procedure
Number of Adverse Events
Occurrence and severity of adverse event related to MCCE procedure versus EGD procedure. Outcomes noted in AE/SAE sections. Adverse Events were NOT collected in the Healthy Volunteer arm.
24-72 hour follow up phone call post EGD procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Participant Satisfaction Score With MCCE Procedure Versus EGD Procedure
24-72 hour follow up phone call post EGD procedure
To Compare Rate of Complete Examination for the MCC and EGD Procedures
Day of procedure
Study Arms (1)
Single Arm Tandem Study
EXPERIMENTALPatients are assigned to swallow a magnetically controlled capsule first then undergo standard gastroscopy
Interventions
Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCC), with or without tether, is used to visualize the upper gastrointestinal tract
Diagnostic endoscopic procedure that visualizes the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract down to the duodenum
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is able to provide informed consent
- Patient has appropriate indications for EGD including symptoms of, but not limited to upper abdominal pain, acid reflux, heartburn, iron deficiency anemia, weight loss, bloating, belching, nausea, vomiting and atypical chest pain.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with dysphagia.
- Patient with previous intestinal surgery.
- Patient with Crohn's disease or other potential obstructive conditions, unless there is a recent CTE, MRE or patency capsule performed to exclude an obstructive lesion that may retain the capsule.
- Female patient who is pregnant.
- Patient with implanted medical device that would be potentially affected by magnets or radiofrequency emissions (e.g., pacemakers, implanted cardiac defibrillators).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anne Foley
- Organization
- University of Massachusetts
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David R Cave, MD, PhD
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Patient blinded to MCC results. EGD assessor blinded to MCC results.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2020
First Posted
October 28, 2020
Study Start
February 10, 2021
Primary Completion
June 30, 2021
Study Completion
March 30, 2023
Last Updated
May 27, 2026
Results First Posted
May 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share