NCT04604236

Brief Summary

The R34 study will integrate existing tools for use with JJ populations and examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a caregiver-youth intervention aimed at increasing SU treatment initiation. The adaptive intervention incorporates three evidence-based components: 1) assessment of motivation and linkage-related barriers with personalized feedback, 2) Mapping-Enhanced Counseling (MEC) for improving readiness for change and interpersonal communication, and 3) Active Linkage (AL) for addressing logistical barriers to service initiation. Youth-caregiver dyads will be randomly assigned to receive an initial dose (2, 1-hr sessions) of either MEC or AL. After 30 days, participants will be classified as Responders (1 or more services initiated) or Non-responders (no service initiation). All participants will be randomized to one of two intervening interventions: an additional dose (2, 1-hr sessions) of the initial intervention (MEC or AL) or a different dose (2, 1-hr sessions of the other). The specific aims are to 1) integrate and adapt appropriate evidence-based intervention components as a dyadic intervention approach for JJ youth and caregivers; 2) test the feasibility, acceptability, and optimal configuration of the dyadic intervention components and the protocol used to evaluate effectiveness (including feasibility of recruitment, implementation, measurement); and 3) preliminarily explore a) whether an initial dose of MEC or AL is sufficient for promoting early initiation and engagement, b) whether an additional dose of MEC or AL or a change in dose is more effective, and c) which component sequence is most effective. Primary outcomes include youth (initiation of assessment or counseling; counseling attendance) and caregiver (attendance at assessment, first counseling, and/or family sessions) measures. Secondary outcomes include youth and caregiver attitudes (problem recognition, desire for help), normative beliefs (SU norms), perceived control (stressors and obstacles), and youth SU (self-report corroborated by UA results). The study addresses the sizeable gap in service receipt among JJ youth by addressing family engagement, and focuses on improving motivation to change, linkage to services, and treatment engagement.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 15, 2020

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 27, 2020

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 7, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 17, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 17, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 8, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

October 15, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 5, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Youth Initiation

    Youth attendance at 1 or more treatment appointment (assessment or counseling), obtained through self-report and corroborated using probation agency attendance records

    Week 4

  • Youth Initiation

    Youth attendance at 1 or more treatment appointment (assessment or counseling), obtained through self-report and corroborated using probation agency attendance records

    Week 9

  • Youth Initiation

    Youth attendance at 1 or more treatment appointment (assessment or counseling), obtained through self-report and corroborated using probation agency attendance records

    Week 17

  • Caregiver attendance with youth at 1 or more treatment appointment

    Caregiver attendance with youth at 1 or more treatment appointment (assessment, counseling)

    Week 4

  • Caregiver attendance with youth at 1 or more treatment appointment

    Caregiver attendance with youth at 1 or more treatment appointment (assessment, counseling)

    Week 9

  • Caregiver attendance with youth at 1 or more treatment appointment

    Caregiver attendance with youth at 1 or more treatment appointment (assessment, counseling)

    Week 17

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Change in Youth Treatment Motivation as measured by the TCU MOT Form

    Weeks 1, 9, and 17

  • Change in Caregiver's Perception of Youth's Treatment Motivation as measured by the TCU MOT Form

    Weeks 1, 9, and 17

  • Change in Youth Normative Beliefs about Substance Use as measured by the TCU THK Form

    Weeks 1, 9, and 17

  • Change in Caregiver Normative Beliefs about Substance Use as measured by the TCU THK Form

    Weeks 1, 9, and 17

  • Change in Youth Perceived Control over Substance Use as measured by the TCU THK Form

    Weeks 1, 9, and 17

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Mapping Enhanced Counseling (MEC)

EXPERIMENTAL

MEC will target attitudes and norms. Attitudes include motivation for change, such as problem recognition and a belief that treatment will help. Subjective norms include normative beliefs about SU in adolescence (e.g., belief that it is ok to allow SU with parental supervision; experimentation is normal) and expectations about treatment.

Behavioral: Mapping Enhanced Counseling

Active Linkage (AL)

EXPERIMENTAL

AL will target perceived control. Perceived control includes perceived logistical barriers and the degree to which individuals feel they can overcome them.

Behavioral: Active Linkage

Interventions

Practitioner-led, collaborative discussion with the youth and their caregiver on co-creating guide maps for decision making around starting treatment and continuing substance use that can help users organize information and think through a series of steps, questions, and behavior choices. encountered when attempting to initiate substance use treatment services. MEC is a communication and decision-making approach that uses graphic visualization tools to train individuals to monitor and control their decision making, improve judgment and behavioral choices (self-regulation), and improve communication and mutual understanding.

Mapping Enhanced Counseling (MEC)
Active LinkageBEHAVIORAL

Practitioner-led, collaborative discussion with the youth and their caregiver on how to overcome barriers encountered when attempting to initiate substance use treatment services. Discussion focuses around the top barriers identified through assessment and identification of 1 or more treatment agency/options that fit the family's needs. Practitioner takes a more active role in addressing barriers to treatment by helping the family find ways to access resources for payment, childcare, or other needs, and actively linking them to the treatment provider (e.g., scheduling the initial appointment with family present).

Active Linkage (AL)

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • pre or post adjudicated or deferred prosecution
  • have an identified SU need within the past 12 months (confirmed by the TCU Drug Screen-5 during initial assessment)
  • speak English
  • no indication of active suicide risk
  • can identify one parent/guardian/responsible adult (caregiver) that is willing to participate who speaks Spanish or English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Texas Christian University

Fort Worth, Texas, 76109, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Danica Knight, PhD

    Texas Christian University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2020

First Posted

October 27, 2020

Study Start

July 7, 2022

Primary Completion

April 17, 2023

Study Completion

April 17, 2023

Last Updated

September 8, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations