Action Observation Training for Upper Limb Recovery in Patients With Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Due to the complexity of the interventions in recovering the upper limb, at the moment there is a lack of evidence about the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions. Action Observation Training (AOT) constitutes a promising rehabilitative method to improve upper limb motor recovery in stroke patients. Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of AOT both on upper limb recovery and on functional outcome when compared to patients treated with the task oriented training (TOT). Both treatments were added to traditional rehabilitative treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2020
CompletedOctober 27, 2020
October 1, 2020
2 months
October 20, 2020
October 24, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity
the scale, which has good psychometric properties, is a quantitative measure of motor impairment in post stroke hemiplegic patients. Items are scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform; 1 = partially performs; 2 = fully performs). The upper limb section (FMA-UE) includes shoulder, elbow, wrist flexion and extension cooperative movement, wrist joint stability, coordination ability, and speed of small joint movement. The four domains assessed include motor function, sensation, passive joint motion, and joint pain. For this study we only used the motor function subscale. The total score of FMA-UE motor function range from 0 to 66.
The first day of treatment - The last day of treatment after four weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Box and Block Test
The first day of treatment - The last day of treatment after four weeks
Functional Independence Measure
The first day of treatment - The last day of treatment after four weeks
Modified Ashworth Scale
The first day of treatment - The last day of treatment after four weeks
Study Arms (2)
Action Observation Training
EXPERIMENTALConventional treatment for 60 mins plus Action Observation Training for 30 mins
Task Oriented Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional treatment for 60 mins plus Task Oriented Training for 30 mins
Interventions
Action Observation Training (AOT) is composed, according to Franceschini et al. (2012), by 20 different videos of daily activities (actions) carried out with the upper limbs. Patients underwent only one task per day for 20 sessions, starting from the easiest. Each action (unimanual or bimanual) is observed from a first-person perspective. Actors in the videos are young non-disabled people, either men or women. Patients are asked to carefully observe the videos, in order to prepare themselves to imitate the presented actions, while the therapist consistently holds the patient's attention with verbal feedback. At the end of each sequence, the therapist prompts the patient to perform the same movement with the paretic upper limb over a time period of 2 minutes, providing verbal instructions or help, if needed. Each session lasts about 30 minutes (3 min of sequence observation and 2 min of action performance for 3 motor sequences repeated twice).
In Task Oriented Training patients performed functional activities with the upper limbs, using the same objects for AOT, in both unimanual and bimanual modalities, without watching the video beforehand. The therapist just provided for verbal instructions and feedback, avoiding demonstrative or imitative indications. The therapist could passively support the movement if patients were completely unable to perform the actions. When necessary, the therapists could also actively facilitate the upper limb movement if patients were unable to correctly perform the actions. Based on the patient's level of motor ability and progress, the levels of movement and task difficulty could be adjusted accordingly. Patients underwent one task per day for 20 sessions. Each session lasted about 30 minutes.
Conventional treatment consists of a range of different patient-tailored interventions, selected by the therapist on the basis of the functional level of the patient. Treatment sessions include training for transfers, mobility, walking up and down steps, balance tasks and tailored functional tasks for the upper limbs (unimanual and bimanual). Moreover, it is also provided for joint and soft tissue mobilization, specific sensory stimulation, exercises to increase strength, both for lower and upper limbs. Each session lasted about 60 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both gender
- First ever stroke
- Unilateral cerebral lesion
- Onset of cerebrovascular pathology for a maximum of 30 days
- Age between 18 and 90 years
- Any schooling
- Preserved ability to understand (Token Test score higher than 8)
- Signature of consent by the patient and/or care giver.
You may not qualify if:
- Posterior circulation infarction
- Bilateral cerebral lesions
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage
- Severe unilateral spatial negligence (documented by a BIT star cancellation test score below 51)
- Presence of ideo-motor apraxia as documented by a score \< 53 in De Renzi's test
- Cognitive impairment (MMSE score below 23. 8)
- Severe visual impairment (documented by NIHSS field of vision examination)
- Failure of the patient and/or care-giver to sign consent
- Documented Alcohol and/or drug abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mancuso Mauro
Grosseto, 58100, Italy
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mauro Mancuso
P.O. Misericordia, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine Unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2020
First Posted
October 27, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2020
Primary Completion
June 30, 2020
Study Completion
July 31, 2020
Last Updated
October 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share