Efficacy of Mouthwash in Reducing Salivary Carriage of COVID-19
Comparison of Normal Saline, Hydrogen Peroxide, Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine Mouth Rinses in COVID-19 Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Researchers know that the virus that causes COVID-19 has been found in the saliva (spit) of individuals who exhibit signs of the disease. Investigators would like to test the ability of three mouthwashes to reduce the levels of this virus in participants' mouths. Investigators will ask participants to use a liquid to swish around in the mouth for 30 seconds and spit it into a collection cup. Investigators will also collect spit from participants before and after participants use the mouthwash. Although participants will have no direct benefits from the study, investigators will gain a wealth of information that would benefit patients who are at risk for COVID-19.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 covid19
Started Oct 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 covid19
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 27, 2020
October 1, 2020
1 month
October 21, 2020
October 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
real time reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR
Saliva load was expressed in copies x 10 8 of COVID-19 RNA
3 measurements of changes from times 0 minutes. vs:15 minutes, and vs: 45 minutes during a single session
ct values
cycle thresholds
3 measurements of changes from times 0 minutes.vs:15 minutes, and vs:45 minutes during a single session
Study Arms (4)
1% Hydrogen Peroxide Mouth Rinse
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 second oral rinse with 1% Hydrogen Peroxide
0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouth Rinse
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 second oral rinse with 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate
0.5% Povidone Iodine Mouth Rinse
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 second oral rinse with 0.5% Povidone Iodine Mouth wash
0.9% Normal Saline Mouth Rinse
PLACEBO COMPARATOR30 second oral rinse with 0.9% Normal Saline
Interventions
Commercially Available Mouth Rinses and Over the Counter Standard Formulations
Commercially Available Mouth Rinses
Commercially Available Over the Counter Standard Formulations USP (United States Pharmacopeia)
Commercially Available Over the Counter Standard Formulations USP (United States Pharmacopeia)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adults age 18-80 admitted to The Ohio State University Medical Center,
- diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR),
- salivary carriage of COVID-19 virus
- ability to perform mouthwash rinses and to expectorate.
You may not qualify if:
- allergy to any study mouth rinse,
- active uncontrolled thyroid disease,
- pregnancy
- patients undergoing radioactive iodine therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Related Publications (10)
Serban D, Banu A, Serban C, Tuta-Sas I, Vlaicu B. Predictors of quantitative microbiological analysis of spatter and aerosolization during scaling. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2013 Apr-Jun;117(2):503-8.
PMID: 24340537BACKGROUNDGupta G, Mitra D, Ashok KP, Gupta A, Soni S, Ahmed S, Arya A. Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):562-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120616. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
PMID: 23855840BACKGROUNDShetty SK, Sharath K, Shenoy S, Sreekumar C, Shetty RN, Biju T. Compare the effcacy of two commercially available mouthrinses in reducing viable bacterial count in dental aerosol produced during ultrasonic scaling when used as a preprocedural rinse. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Sep 1;14(5):848-51. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1414.
PMID: 24685786BACKGROUNDDevker NR, Mohitey J, Vibhute A, Chouhan VS, Chavan P, Malagi S, Joseph R. A study to evaluate and compare the efficacy of preprocedural mouthrinsing and high volume evacuator attachment alone and in combination in reducing the amount of viable aerosols produced during ultrasonic scaling procedure. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Sep 1;13(5):681-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1209.
PMID: 23250175BACKGROUNDKlyn SL, Cummings DE, Richardson BW, Davis RD. Reduction of bacteria-containing spray produced during ultrasonic scaling. Gen Dent. 2001 Nov-Dec;49(6):648-52.
PMID: 12024755BACKGROUNDWirthlin MR, Choi JH, Kye SB. Use of chlorine dioxide mouthrinse as the ultrasonic scaling lavage reduces the viable bacteria in the generated aerosols. J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr. 2006;54(2):35-44. No abstract available.
PMID: 17214015BACKGROUNDPeng X, Xu X, Li Y, Cheng L, Zhou X, Ren B. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci. 2020 Mar 3;12(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-0075-9.
PMID: 32127517BACKGROUNDNavazesh M. Methods for collecting saliva. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Sep 20;694:72-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb18343.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 8215087BACKGROUNDTo KK, Tsang OT, Yip CC, Chan KH, Wu TC, Chan JM, Leung WS, Chik TS, Choi CY, Kandamby DH, Lung DC, Tam AR, Poon RW, Fung AY, Hung IF, Cheng VC, Chan JF, Yuen KY. Consistent Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Saliva. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):841-843. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa149.
PMID: 32047895BACKGROUNDChaudhary P, Melkonyan A, Meethil A, Saraswat S, Hall DL, Cottle J, Wenzel M, Ayouty N, Bense S, Casanova F, Chaney M, Chase H, Hermel R, McClement M, Sesson C, Woolsey B, Kumar P. Estimating salivary carriage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in nonsymptomatic people and efficacy of mouthrinse in reducing viral load: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Nov;152(11):903-908. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
PMID: 34561086DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
David L Hall, DDS
The Ohio State University College of Dentistry
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double Blinded. All mouthwash vials are masked.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Hospital Attending
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2020
First Posted
October 27, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2020
Primary Completion
November 1, 2020
Study Completion
November 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
As per The Ohio State University Office for Responsible Research Practices (Human Studies IRB)