Concentric Versus Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique on Upper Cross Syndrome
Effects of Concentric Versus Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique on Pain, Muscle Length and Function in Upper Cross Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project was a Randomized control trial conducted to check the effects of eccentric and concentric muscle energy techniques on patients with upper cross syndrome so that we can have best treatment option for patients with upper cross syndrome, duration was of 6months,convenient sampling was done, subject following eligibility criteria from Mansoura hospital female physiotherapy department, Lahore were randomly allocated in two groups via lottery method, baseline assessment was done, Group A participants were given conservative treatment along with eccentric muscle energy technique and Group B participants were given conservative treatment along with concentric muscle energy technique than on 1st,3rdand 6th week post intervention assessment was done via neck disability index, Numeric rating scale, inches tape method,3 sessions per week were given, data was analyzed by using SPSS version 26.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2020
CompletedOctober 27, 2020
October 1, 2020
8 months
October 19, 2020
October 26, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Neck disability index
10-item questionnaire that measures a patient's self-reported neck pain related disability. A higher NDI score means the greater a patient's perceived disability due to neck pain. 10 item score from 0-5.maximum score is 50. * 0 to 4(0-8%)=no disability * 5 to14(19-28%)=mild * 15 to24(30-48%)=moderate * 25 to 34 (50-64%)=severe * Above 34(70-80%)=complete. 10-item questionnaire that measures a patient's self-reported neck pain related disability. A higher NDI score means the greater a patient's perceived disability due to neck pain. 10 item score from 0-5.maximum score is 50. * 0 to 4(0-8%)=no disability * 5 to14(19-28%)=mild * 15 to24(30-48%)=moderate * 25 to 34 (50-64%)=severe * Above 34(70-80%)=complete
6th Week
Secondary Outcomes (1)
NPRS
6th Week
Other Outcomes (1)
Inches Tape method
6th Week
Study Arms (2)
Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique
EXPERIMENTALconventional physical therapy Along with eccentric muscle energy technique
concentric muscle energy technique
EXPERIMENTALConventional physical therapy along with concentric muscle energy technique
Interventions
Conventional Treatment given to both groups (Hot pack for 15 minutes, Mobilization, AROM Exercises 10 sets x 3days in a week) Reciprocal inhibition of target muscle (i.e. levator scapulae ,pectoralis major, upper trapezius) causing relaxation, patient force is minimal towards maximal therapist force, 5-7 repetition for 2-4seconds 3 days in a week up to 6 weeks. Muscle is taken from shortened to lengthened position.
Group B: Concentric Muscle Energy Technique: (Autogenic inhibition of target muscle (i.e. levator scapulae ,pectoralis major, upper trapezius) patient force is greater than therapist force, 5-7repitition for 3-4seconds)Muscle is taken from lengthened to shortened position. On eligible participants baseline assessment was done,3 session were given 3days per week, post intervention assessment was taken at 1st 3rd and 6th week
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- month chronic neck pain
- upper cross syndrome:
- Clinical picture (Postural Changes):
- Forward head posture
- Increased cervical lordosis and thoracic kyphosis
- Elevated and protracted shoulders (Rounded shoulders)
- A hunched upper back
- Rotation or abduction and winging of the scapula
- Test: Janda test: Patient supine tries to elevate the head from the couch. Normally the lordosis will disappear and the chin will touch the sternum. Otherwise pathological picture shows that the head is lifted with the very tense neck muscles
You may not qualify if:
- Patients having any serious trauma on neck i.e. whiplash injury
- Spinal fracture
- Cervicogenic headache
- History of systemic disease RA, SLE, TUMOR
- psychiatric disorder
- Any Red flag
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mansoora hospital, Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Related Publications (15)
Joshi S, Srivastava N. To Compare the Effectiveness of Active Release Technique and Conventional Physical Therapy in the Management of Upper Cross Syndrome. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. 2018;12(4).
BACKGROUNDRivera CE. Core and Lumbopelvic Stabilization in Runners. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2016 Feb;27(1):319-37. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.09.003.
PMID: 26616187BACKGROUNDRajalaxmi V, Paul J, Nithya M, Lekha SC, Likitha B. Effectiveness of three dimensional approach of schroth method and yoga on pulmonary function test and posture in upper crossed syndrome with neck Pain-A double blinded study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018;11(5):1835-9.
BACKGROUNDIzzo R, Popolizio T, D'Aprile P, Muto M. Spinal pain. Eur J Radiol. 2015 May;84(5):746-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
PMID: 25824642BACKGROUNDYoo K-T, Lee H-S. Effects of therapeutic exercise on posture, pain and asymmetric muscle activity in a patient with forward head posture: Case report. Journal of Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2016;11(1):71-82.
BACKGROUNDRajalaxmi V, Ranjani V, Paul J, Subramanian S, Cyrus BE, Pavithralochani V. Efficacy of Neck Stabilization and Postural Correction Exercise on Pain, Posture, Disability, Respiratory Dysfuntions and Mental Status in Desk Job Workers-A Randomised Controlled Double Blinded Study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019;12(5):2333-8.
BACKGROUNDCohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Feb;90(2):284-99. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008.
PMID: 25659245BACKGROUNDMujawar JC, Sagar JH. Prevalence of Upper Cross Syndrome in Laundry Workers. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;23(1):54-56. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_169_18.
PMID: 31040591BACKGROUNDTiefel K. The Efficacy of Treatment for Upper Crossed Syndrome and the Involvement of Chiropractic. 2012.
BACKGROUNDShahzad AN, Shakil-ur-Rehman S, Rafique N. Effectiveness of eccentric and concentric muscle energy techniques on hamstring length in healthy population. Rawal Medical Journal. 2019;44(2):350-2.
BACKGROUNDOsama M, Tassadaq N, Malik RJ. Effect of muscle energy techniques and facet joint mobilization on spinal curvature in patients with mechanical neck pain: A pilot study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Feb;70(2):344-347. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.14189.
PMID: 32063632BACKGROUNDOsama M, Shakil Ur Rehman S. Effects of static stretching as compared to autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition muscle energy techniques in the management of mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 May;70(5):786-790. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.9596.
PMID: 32400728BACKGROUNDRana AA, Ahmad A, Gillani SA, Idrees MQ, Awan I. Effects of conventional physical therapy with and without muscle energy techniques for treatment of Upper Cross Syndrome. Rawal Medical Journal. 2020;45(1):127-32.
BACKGROUNDPhadke A, Bedekar N, Shyam A, Sancheti P. Effect of muscle energy technique and static stretching on pain and functional disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2016 Apr 14;35:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002. eCollection 2016 Dec.
PMID: 30931028BACKGROUNDReese NB, Bandy WD. Joint range of motion and muscle length testing-E-book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Syed Shakil Ur-Rehman, PhD
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2020
First Posted
October 27, 2020
Study Start
December 30, 2019
Primary Completion
August 30, 2020
Study Completion
September 30, 2020
Last Updated
October 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share