Pregabalin Treatment for Trigger Points
Effectiveness of Pregabalin Treatment for Trigger Points in Patients With Comorbid Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Fibromyalgia Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common problem in the general population. MPS should not be a local/peripheral painful syndrome and considered to be a syndrome of central sensitivity. We aimed to investigate the effect of pregabalin in patients with MPS in this study
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 26, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 26, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2020
CompletedOctober 23, 2020
October 1, 2020
3 months
October 18, 2020
October 22, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Visual analog scale (VAS)
VAS is psychometric measuring instrument designed to document the characteristics of disease-related symptom severity in each patient and use this to achieve a rapid classification of symptom severity and disease control. Patients were instructed to rate their pain between 0 and 10
3 months
Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) assessment
We assessed PPTs in upper trapezius trigger points with an algometer in all patients. PPT is defined as the minimal amount of pressure required to change a sensation of pressure to pain. An electronic algometer (Baseline Push Pull Force Gauge) was used, which consisted of a metal piston with a 1-cm circular rubber tip. Pressure measurements were recorded as kilograms per square centimeter (kg/cm2) with the patient in a seated position. The algometer was placed at a selected trigger point with the metal rod perpendicular to the surface of the skin, the pressure applied to the muscles was increased at a rate of approximately 1 kg per second, and the patient was instructed to state when pain was perceived. This procedure was repeated three times per patient, with 1-minute intervals. The mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) was calculated and used for the main analysis. If trigger points were in both upper trapezius muscle, the dominant side was evaluated.
3 months
DN4 - Questionnaire (DN4)
DN4 was used to evaluate neuropathic pain. DN4 is used to identify neuropathic pain and consists of ten questions. Seven questions are concerned with symptoms and three are concerned with clinical findings. Symptoms assessed are burning, painful cold, electric shocks, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, and itching. The physician assesses whether there is reduced sensation (hypoesthesia) to touch or pinprick, and if light brushing increases or causes pain (allodynia) by examination. Each item is scored "yes" (1 point) or "no" (0 points). If the total score is ≥4, the pain is likely to be neuropathic
3 months
Short Form-36 (SF36)
The SF36 is a self-reported questionnaire widely used to measure quality of life. The questions are summarized into eight scales: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The initial four items form the physical component summary measuring physical health domains, while the latter four items form the mental component summary measuring mental health domains. Scores can range from 0 (worst health status) to 100 (best health status) per domain. Higher scores indicate better health status for the calculated sub item
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received pregabalin (target dose 300 mg/day) and exercise therapy (stretching exercises for the trapezius muscle). Patients were instructed to perform 10 repetitions three times a day., 3 months
Group 2
NO INTERVENTIONPatients received exercise therapy alone (stretching exercises for the trapezius muscle). Patients were instructed to perform 10 repetitions three times a day., 3 months
Interventions
Patients in group I received pregabalin at a dose of 75 mg twice daily during the first week that was increased to 150 mg twice daily thereafter and maintained at that level for 12 weeks. Patients in two groups received exercise therapy (stretching exercises for the trapezius muscle). Patients were instructed to perform 10 repetitions three times a day., 3 months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who diagnosed fibromyalgia syndrome,
- Patients who were also diagnosed as cervical myofascial pain syndrome based on the upper trapezius muscle
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had received dry needling or local anesthetic injection to trigger point in the dominant upper trapezius muscle within 3 months of the start of the study.
- renal insufficiency,
- impaired liver function,
- malignancy,
- pregnancy
- infections,
- history of drug or alcohol abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34752, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Karamanlioglu DS, Geler Kulcu D, Ozturk G, Akpinar P, Unlu Ozkan F, Aktas I. Effectiveness of pregabalin treatment for trigger points in patients with comorbid myofascial pain syndrome and fibromyalgia syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Somatosens Mot Res. 2021 Dec;38(4):327-332. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2021.1977265. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
PMID: 34544324DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Duygu Silte Karamanlioglu, MD
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Duygu Geler Kulcu, prof
Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Gulcan Ozturk, MD
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Pinar Akpinar, Assoc prof
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Feyza Unlu Ozkan, Assoc prof
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Ilknur Aktas, Prof
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2020
First Posted
October 23, 2020
Study Start
April 26, 2014
Primary Completion
July 26, 2014
Study Completion
January 26, 2015
Last Updated
October 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share