NCT04597801

Brief Summary

With the appliance of the in-vivo microscopy after Fluorescein staining, the investigators hypothesize that the preliminary in-vivo histopathological diagnostic accuracy is not inferior to conventional frozen section analysis accuracy when using the final histopathological result as gold standard.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
210

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 14, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 30, 2020

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 17, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 3, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 10, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

September 14, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 9, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Significance: The diagnostic accuracies of the individual methods used for preliminary intraoperative histopathological diagnosis (D1:fluorescein sodium with in-vivo microscopy versus D2: preliminary frozen section assessment)

    The primary objective of the clinical trial is to compare the significance of intravenously applied fluorescein as staining agent for assessment of brain tissue texture via in-vivo confocal microscopy with the conventional intraoperative histological frozen section analysis of identical brain tissue samples in the same patient. Both methods will be compared in terms of their accuracy using the standard of practice, the final pathological diagnosis (immunochemistry/molecular pathology).

    14 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Incidence of adverse events during surgery and until end of follow-up period (Safety Assessment)

    24 days

  • Analysis of surgical time span (comparison of the time span to conduct the assessment of brain tissue texture with fluorescein intervention with the time span to conduct assessment of conventional intraoperative frozen section intervention.

    14 days

Study Arms (1)

Fluorescein sodium

EXPERIMENTAL

A single dose of fluorescein sodium is applied before brain tumor resection. 20-40 minutes prior to the planned tumor resection, a bolus of 5 mg per kg body weight is administered intravenously, staining tumor tissue with fluorescent dye to visualize tumor cells.

Drug: Alcon

Interventions

AlconDRUG

Fluorescein sodium is administered intravenously with a bolus injection of 5 mg per kg of bodyweight 20-40 minutes prior to the planned tumor resection.

Also known as: Fluorescein sodium
Fluorescein sodium

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Signed informed consent
  • Suspected intracranial tumor revealed by cranial magnetic resonance imaging (according to clinical routine) scheduled for resection with intraoperative frozen section evaluation

You may not qualify if:

  • Known allergic or suspected allergic reactions to fluorescein sodium
  • Liver disease, CHILD B or C
  • Patients under medication with beta-blockers, digoxin, chinidin and probenecid as well as inhibitors of glucuronidation, such as immunosuppressants, when the medication must not be discontinued perioperatively
  • Patients with relevant congenital limitations of glucuronidation performance (e.g. Rotor syndrome, Gilbert-Meulengracht syndrome, Crigler-Najjar syndrome)
  • Patients with terminal renal failure requiring hemodialysis
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Pregnancy (incl. positive pregnancy test)
  • Women of childbearing age must be non-lactating and surgically sterile or using a highly effective method of birth control and have a negative pregnancy test. Acceptable methods of birth control with a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correct are such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs), sexual abstinence or vasectomized partner.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Universitätsklinikum Mannheim

Mannheim, 68167, Germany

Location

Technische Universität München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie

München, 81675, Germany

Location

Universitätsklinikum Regensburg

Regensburg, 93053, Germany

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Neoplasms

Interventions

methylacetyleneFluorescein

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsNervous System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FluoresceinsSpiro CompoundsHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsXanthenesHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Jens PD Gempt, MD

    Technische Universität München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2020

First Posted

October 22, 2020

Study Start

December 30, 2020

Primary Completion

June 17, 2022

Study Completion

August 3, 2022

Last Updated

November 10, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPDs will not be shared

Locations