Comparison of Fluorescein-INtra-VItal Microscopy Versus Conventional Frozen Section Diagnosis for intraOperative Histopathological Evaluation
INVIVO
1 other identifier
interventional
210
1 country
3
Brief Summary
With the appliance of the in-vivo microscopy after Fluorescein staining, the investigators hypothesize that the preliminary in-vivo histopathological diagnostic accuracy is not inferior to conventional frozen section analysis accuracy when using the final histopathological result as gold standard.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Dec 2020
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 17, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 3, 2022
CompletedNovember 10, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.5 years
September 14, 2020
November 9, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Significance: The diagnostic accuracies of the individual methods used for preliminary intraoperative histopathological diagnosis (D1:fluorescein sodium with in-vivo microscopy versus D2: preliminary frozen section assessment)
The primary objective of the clinical trial is to compare the significance of intravenously applied fluorescein as staining agent for assessment of brain tissue texture via in-vivo confocal microscopy with the conventional intraoperative histological frozen section analysis of identical brain tissue samples in the same patient. Both methods will be compared in terms of their accuracy using the standard of practice, the final pathological diagnosis (immunochemistry/molecular pathology).
14 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of adverse events during surgery and until end of follow-up period (Safety Assessment)
24 days
Analysis of surgical time span (comparison of the time span to conduct the assessment of brain tissue texture with fluorescein intervention with the time span to conduct assessment of conventional intraoperative frozen section intervention.
14 days
Study Arms (1)
Fluorescein sodium
EXPERIMENTALA single dose of fluorescein sodium is applied before brain tumor resection. 20-40 minutes prior to the planned tumor resection, a bolus of 5 mg per kg body weight is administered intravenously, staining tumor tissue with fluorescent dye to visualize tumor cells.
Interventions
Fluorescein sodium is administered intravenously with a bolus injection of 5 mg per kg of bodyweight 20-40 minutes prior to the planned tumor resection.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Signed informed consent
- Suspected intracranial tumor revealed by cranial magnetic resonance imaging (according to clinical routine) scheduled for resection with intraoperative frozen section evaluation
You may not qualify if:
- Known allergic or suspected allergic reactions to fluorescein sodium
- Liver disease, CHILD B or C
- Patients under medication with beta-blockers, digoxin, chinidin and probenecid as well as inhibitors of glucuronidation, such as immunosuppressants, when the medication must not be discontinued perioperatively
- Patients with relevant congenital limitations of glucuronidation performance (e.g. Rotor syndrome, Gilbert-Meulengracht syndrome, Crigler-Najjar syndrome)
- Patients with terminal renal failure requiring hemodialysis
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Pregnancy (incl. positive pregnancy test)
- Women of childbearing age must be non-lactating and surgically sterile or using a highly effective method of birth control and have a negative pregnancy test. Acceptable methods of birth control with a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correct are such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs), sexual abstinence or vasectomized partner.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Technical University of Munichlead
- Carl Zeiss Meditec AGcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
Mannheim, 68167, Germany
Technische Universität München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie
München, 81675, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Regensburg, 93053, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jens PD Gempt, MD
Technische Universität München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2020
First Posted
October 22, 2020
Study Start
December 30, 2020
Primary Completion
June 17, 2022
Study Completion
August 3, 2022
Last Updated
November 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPDs will not be shared