Ankle Robotics After Stroke
Portable Ankle Robotics to Reverse Foot Drop After Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The randomized study (in Phase II of the U44) compares the efficacy and durability of 9 weeks (18 sessions) of robot-assisted physical therapy (PTR) versus physical therapy (PT) alone on foot drop as assessed by gait biomechanics (ankle angle at initial contact, peak swing ankle angle, number of heel-first strikes - % total steps, gait velocity) and blinded clinician assessment (dorsiflexion active range of motion, ankle muscle strength, assistive device needs).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2025
CompletedJanuary 26, 2023
January 1, 2023
4.5 years
October 14, 2020
January 24, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Angle at Initial Contact
Angle at initial contact averaged across each gait cycle for each subject at a given testing time point.
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Swing Dorsiflexion
Peak swing dorsiflexion averaged across each gait cycle for each subject at a given testing time point.
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Number of Heel-First Foot Strikes
Number of heel-first foot strikes for each subject at a given testing time point.
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Gait Velocity
Average gait velocity (meters/second) for each subject at a given testing time point.
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Active range of motion for Dorsiflexion
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Ankle Muscle Strength
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Number of Participants Using Assistive Devices and Ankle Foot Orthoses
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Dynamic Gait Index
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Berg Balance Scale
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
PTR (Physical Therapy while wearing Robot group) (Phase II)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
PT (Physical Therapy Only) (Phase II)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with therapist assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
X-PTR, Cross over group for Physical Therapy n Sub-Acute group.
EXPERIMENTALParticipants enrolled in the physical therapy only group will be given the option to re-enroll as a cross over participant to receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
C-PTR, Chronic Stroke Subjects to receive robotic gait training therapy.
EXPERIMENTALChronic stroke subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Interventions
Subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with therapist assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Participants enrolled in the physical therapy only group will be given the option to re-enroll as a cross over participant to receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Chronic stroke subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 18 and older
- In the subacute phase of stroke recovery (\>6 weeks to \<6 months post-stroke) with residual hemiparesis of the lower extremity that includes symptoms of foot-drop. - or - In the chronic phase of stroke recovery (\>6 months post-stroke) with residual hemiparesis of the lower extremity that includes symptoms of foot-drop.
- Clear indications of hemiparetic gait by clinical observation
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiac history of (a) unstable angina, (b) recent (less than 3 months) myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (NYHA category II); (c) hemodynamically significant valvular dysfunction
- Hypertension that is a contraindication for routine physical therapy (greater than 160/100 on two assessments).
- Medical History: (a) recent hospitalization (less than 3 months) for severe medical disease, (b) symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease, (c) orthopedic or chronic pain conditions that significantly alter gait function, (d) pulmonary or renal failure (e) active cancer
- History of non-stroke neuromuscular disorder restricting gait.
- Aphasia or cognitive functioning that confounds participation, defined as unable to follow 2 step commands or judgment of the medical officer or therapist.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Maryland Rehabilitation & Orthopaedic Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, 21207, United States
Related Publications (2)
Roy A, Hennessie B, Hafer-Macko C, Forrester LW, Westlake K, Macko RF. Adaptive control ankle robotics training durably improves gait biomechanics in chronic hemiparetic stroke and footdrop. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Dec 29. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01834-2. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.
PMID: 41462280DERIVEDRoy A, Hennessie B, Hafer-Macko C, Westlake K, Macko R. Dorsiflexion Specific Ankle Robotics to Enhance Motor Learning After Stroke: A Preliminary Report. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Jun 25:rs.3.rs-4390770. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4390770/v1.
PMID: 38978605DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Brad Hennessie, MHA, MBA
NextStep Robotics Inc.
Central Study Contacts
Richard Macko, MD
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2020
First Posted
October 20, 2020
Study Start
August 20, 2020
Primary Completion
February 28, 2025
Study Completion
February 28, 2025
Last Updated
January 26, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01