NCT04590105

Brief Summary

The investigators developed a smartphone app that guides pediatric patients and their families through colonoscopy prep in an attempt to see if an app could improve the colonoscopy process.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 15, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2015

Completed
5.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 28, 2020

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 19, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 19, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

September 28, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 10, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Smartphone application use was associated with increased number of "excellent" colonoscopy preps.

    Prep quality was measured with the validated Boston Scoring Scale. A score of 0, 1, 2 or 3 is given to the right, transverse and left colon based on the amount and consistency of stool visualized as well as the ease or difficulty of guiding endoscopic instrumentation during a colonoscopy. Higher scores indicate a cleaner colon and as per Lai, a Boston Score of 7 or above indicates an "excellent" prep. To eliminate bias, the four grading gastroenterologists did not know whether subjects had used written or app instructions.

    Each subject was assessed from the time they were scheduled for their colonoscopy to the day of their procedure, up to three months for subjects. Subjects were scored on their colonoscopies immediately following the procedure once the patient was stable

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The difference in the number of calls to the gastroenterology service between app users and controls.

    Each subject was assessed from the time they were scheduled for their colonoscopy to the day of their procedure, up to three months for subjects

  • The difference between app users and controls regarding patient arrival time.

    Each subject was assessed from the time they were scheduled for their colonoscopy to the day of their procedure, up to three months for subjects

  • The significant difference between app users and controls regarding patient knowledge about the procedure.

    Each subject was assessed from the time they were scheduled for their colonoscopy to the day of their procedure, up to three months for subjects

Study Arms (2)

App Subject

EXPERIMENTAL

Users who were assigned to use a smartphone app downloaded a free app from the iOS App or Google Play stores titled "SB Colonoscopy Prep." The app informed subjects about their colonoscopy procedure, alerts them when to take their medications throughout the hours-long colonoscopy prep process and tells them when to arrive to the endoscopy suite.

Device: Smartphone App "SB Colonoscopy Prep"

Written Instruction Subjects

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects in the control group were given a three-page document that described the procedure and instructed users on how to take the preparation medications. The written instructions had a list of frequently asked questions about colonoscopies and the URL of a website where users could view the animated video that was included in the app. The written instructions also contained the time and date of the procedure. All subjects were instructed to arrive one hour before their scheduled procedure.

Other: Written Instruction

Interventions

We created a smartphone app that informs patients about their colonoscopy procedure, alerts them when to take their medications throughout the hours-long colonoscopy prep process and tells them when to arrive to the endoscopy suite.

App Subject

Written Instruction

Written Instruction Subjects

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • \- Aged 5-18 years scheduled to undergo a diagnostic and/or therapeutic colonoscopy

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who had undergone a colonoscopy within the past one year
  • Patients admitted for a nasogastric (NG) cleanout
  • Patients requiring colonoscopy preparation medication other than Polyethylene Glycol
  • Patients with poor understanding of English.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (15)

  • Pall H, Zacur GM, Kramer RE, Lirio RA, Manfredi M, Shah M, Stephen TC, Tucker N, Gibbons TE, Sahn B, McOmber M, Friedlander J, Quiros JA, Fishman DS, Mamula P. Bowel preparation for pediatric colonoscopy: report of the NASPGHAN endoscopy and procedures committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Sep;59(3):409-16. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000447.

    PMID: 24897169BACKGROUND
  • Pillai A, Menon R, Oustecky D, Ahmad A. Educational Colonoscopy Video Enhances Bowel Preparation Quality and Comprehension in an Inner City Population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;52(6):515-518. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000893.

    PMID: 28742732BACKGROUND
  • Hayat U, Lee PJ, Lopez R, Vargo JJ, Rizk MK. Online Educational Video Improves Bowel Preparation and Reduces the Need for Repeat Colonoscopy Within Three Years. Am J Med. 2016 Nov;129(11):1219.e1-1219.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 6.

    PMID: 27393880BACKGROUND
  • Park JS, Kim MS, Kim H, Kim SI, Shin CH, Lee HJ, Lee WS, Moon S. A randomized controlled trial of an educational video to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun 17;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0476-6.

    PMID: 27317249BACKGROUND
  • Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Moreno de Vega V, Marin I, Barbera M, Boix J. Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using a smart phone application: a randomized trial. Dig Endosc. 2015 Jul;27(5):590-5. doi: 10.1111/den.12467. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

    PMID: 25708251BACKGROUND
  • Kang X, Zhao L, Leung F, Luo H, Wang L, Wu J, Guo X, Wang X, Zhang L, Hui N, Tao Q, Jia H, Liu Z, Chen Z, Liu J, Wu K, Fan D, Pan Y, Guo X. Delivery of Instructions via Mobile Social Media App Increases Quality of Bowel Preparation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;14(3):429-435.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

    PMID: 26492848BACKGROUND
  • Cook KA, Modena BD, Simon RA. Improvement in Asthma Control Using a Minimally Burdensome and Proactive Smartphone Application. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Jul-Aug;4(4):730-737.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

    PMID: 27107690BACKGROUND
  • Iacoviello BM, Steinerman JR, Klein DB, Silver TL, Berger AG, Luo SX, Schork NJ. Clickotine, A Personalized Smartphone App for Smoking Cessation: Initial Evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Apr 25;5(4):e56. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7226.

    PMID: 28442453BACKGROUND
  • Voiosu A, Tantau A, Garbulet C, Tantau M, Mateescu B, Baicus C, Voiosu R, Voiosu T. Factors affecting colonoscopy comfort and compliance: a questionnaire based multicenter study. Rom J Intern Med. 2014;52(3):151-7.

    PMID: 25509558BACKGROUND
  • Sagawa T, Sato K, Tomizawa T, Mizuide M, Yasuoka H, Shimoyama Y, Kuribayashi S, Kakizaki S, Kawamura O, Kusano M, Yamada M. A prospective randomized controlled trial of AJG522 versus standard PEG+E as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:521756. doi: 10.1155/2015/521756. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

    PMID: 25688357BACKGROUND
  • Ting TV, Kudalkar D, Nelson S, Cortina S, Pendl J, Budhani S, Neville J, Taylor J, Huggins J, Drotar D, Brunner HI. Usefulness of cellular text messaging for improving adherence among adolescents and young adults with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2012 Jan;39(1):174-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110771. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

    PMID: 22089460BACKGROUND
  • Perski O, Blandford A, Ubhi HK, West R, Michie S. Smokers' and drinkers' choice of smartphone applications and expectations of engagement: a think aloud and interview study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0422-8.

    PMID: 28241759BACKGROUND
  • Badawy SM, Kuhns LM. Economic Evaluation of Text-Messaging and Smartphone-Based Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence in Adolescents with Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Oct 25;4(4):e121. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6425.

    PMID: 27780795BACKGROUND
  • Iribarren SJ, Cato K, Falzon L, Stone PW. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170581. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28152012BACKGROUND
  • Brief J, Chawla A, Lerner D, Vitola B, Woroniecki R, Morganstern J. The Impact of a Smartphone App on the Quality of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparations: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020 Nov 10;3(2):e18174. doi: 10.2196/18174.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leukemia, LymphoidLeukemiaNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesLymphoproliferative DisordersLymphatic DiseasesImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey Morganstern, MD

    Stony Brook University Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Subjects were randomly assigned via block randomization to receive either written or software-based prep instructions. To eliminate bias, the four grading gastroenterologists who judged the quality of the subject's cleanout did not know whether subjects had used written or app instructions.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Subjects were randomly assigned via block randomization to receive either written or software-based prep instructions.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2020

First Posted

October 19, 2020

Study Start

November 15, 2014

Primary Completion

May 1, 2015

Study Completion

May 1, 2015

Last Updated

October 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

I am happy to share all data in whatever way is easiest for everyone

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Immediately
Access Criteria
Email request