The Impact of a Smartphone App on the Quality of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparations
1 other identifier
interventional
42
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The investigators developed a smartphone app that guides pediatric patients and their families through colonoscopy prep in an attempt to see if an app could improve the colonoscopy process.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedOctober 19, 2020
October 1, 2020
6 months
September 28, 2020
October 10, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Smartphone application use was associated with increased number of "excellent" colonoscopy preps.
Prep quality was measured with the validated Boston Scoring Scale. A score of 0, 1, 2 or 3 is given to the right, transverse and left colon based on the amount and consistency of stool visualized as well as the ease or difficulty of guiding endoscopic instrumentation during a colonoscopy. Higher scores indicate a cleaner colon and as per Lai, a Boston Score of 7 or above indicates an "excellent" prep. To eliminate bias, the four grading gastroenterologists did not know whether subjects had used written or app instructions.
Each subject was assessed from the time they were scheduled for their colonoscopy to the day of their procedure, up to three months for subjects. Subjects were scored on their colonoscopies immediately following the procedure once the patient was stable
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The difference in the number of calls to the gastroenterology service between app users and controls.
Each subject was assessed from the time they were scheduled for their colonoscopy to the day of their procedure, up to three months for subjects
The difference between app users and controls regarding patient arrival time.
Each subject was assessed from the time they were scheduled for their colonoscopy to the day of their procedure, up to three months for subjects
The significant difference between app users and controls regarding patient knowledge about the procedure.
Each subject was assessed from the time they were scheduled for their colonoscopy to the day of their procedure, up to three months for subjects
Study Arms (2)
App Subject
EXPERIMENTALUsers who were assigned to use a smartphone app downloaded a free app from the iOS App or Google Play stores titled "SB Colonoscopy Prep." The app informed subjects about their colonoscopy procedure, alerts them when to take their medications throughout the hours-long colonoscopy prep process and tells them when to arrive to the endoscopy suite.
Written Instruction Subjects
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in the control group were given a three-page document that described the procedure and instructed users on how to take the preparation medications. The written instructions had a list of frequently asked questions about colonoscopies and the URL of a website where users could view the animated video that was included in the app. The written instructions also contained the time and date of the procedure. All subjects were instructed to arrive one hour before their scheduled procedure.
Interventions
We created a smartphone app that informs patients about their colonoscopy procedure, alerts them when to take their medications throughout the hours-long colonoscopy prep process and tells them when to arrive to the endoscopy suite.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Aged 5-18 years scheduled to undergo a diagnostic and/or therapeutic colonoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had undergone a colonoscopy within the past one year
- Patients admitted for a nasogastric (NG) cleanout
- Patients requiring colonoscopy preparation medication other than Polyethylene Glycol
- Patients with poor understanding of English.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (15)
Pall H, Zacur GM, Kramer RE, Lirio RA, Manfredi M, Shah M, Stephen TC, Tucker N, Gibbons TE, Sahn B, McOmber M, Friedlander J, Quiros JA, Fishman DS, Mamula P. Bowel preparation for pediatric colonoscopy: report of the NASPGHAN endoscopy and procedures committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Sep;59(3):409-16. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000447.
PMID: 24897169BACKGROUNDPillai A, Menon R, Oustecky D, Ahmad A. Educational Colonoscopy Video Enhances Bowel Preparation Quality and Comprehension in an Inner City Population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;52(6):515-518. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000893.
PMID: 28742732BACKGROUNDHayat U, Lee PJ, Lopez R, Vargo JJ, Rizk MK. Online Educational Video Improves Bowel Preparation and Reduces the Need for Repeat Colonoscopy Within Three Years. Am J Med. 2016 Nov;129(11):1219.e1-1219.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
PMID: 27393880BACKGROUNDPark JS, Kim MS, Kim H, Kim SI, Shin CH, Lee HJ, Lee WS, Moon S. A randomized controlled trial of an educational video to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun 17;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0476-6.
PMID: 27317249BACKGROUNDLorenzo-Zuniga V, Moreno de Vega V, Marin I, Barbera M, Boix J. Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using a smart phone application: a randomized trial. Dig Endosc. 2015 Jul;27(5):590-5. doi: 10.1111/den.12467. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
PMID: 25708251BACKGROUNDKang X, Zhao L, Leung F, Luo H, Wang L, Wu J, Guo X, Wang X, Zhang L, Hui N, Tao Q, Jia H, Liu Z, Chen Z, Liu J, Wu K, Fan D, Pan Y, Guo X. Delivery of Instructions via Mobile Social Media App Increases Quality of Bowel Preparation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;14(3):429-435.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
PMID: 26492848BACKGROUNDCook KA, Modena BD, Simon RA. Improvement in Asthma Control Using a Minimally Burdensome and Proactive Smartphone Application. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Jul-Aug;4(4):730-737.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
PMID: 27107690BACKGROUNDIacoviello BM, Steinerman JR, Klein DB, Silver TL, Berger AG, Luo SX, Schork NJ. Clickotine, A Personalized Smartphone App for Smoking Cessation: Initial Evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Apr 25;5(4):e56. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7226.
PMID: 28442453BACKGROUNDVoiosu A, Tantau A, Garbulet C, Tantau M, Mateescu B, Baicus C, Voiosu R, Voiosu T. Factors affecting colonoscopy comfort and compliance: a questionnaire based multicenter study. Rom J Intern Med. 2014;52(3):151-7.
PMID: 25509558BACKGROUNDSagawa T, Sato K, Tomizawa T, Mizuide M, Yasuoka H, Shimoyama Y, Kuribayashi S, Kakizaki S, Kawamura O, Kusano M, Yamada M. A prospective randomized controlled trial of AJG522 versus standard PEG+E as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:521756. doi: 10.1155/2015/521756. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
PMID: 25688357BACKGROUNDTing TV, Kudalkar D, Nelson S, Cortina S, Pendl J, Budhani S, Neville J, Taylor J, Huggins J, Drotar D, Brunner HI. Usefulness of cellular text messaging for improving adherence among adolescents and young adults with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2012 Jan;39(1):174-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110771. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
PMID: 22089460BACKGROUNDPerski O, Blandford A, Ubhi HK, West R, Michie S. Smokers' and drinkers' choice of smartphone applications and expectations of engagement: a think aloud and interview study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0422-8.
PMID: 28241759BACKGROUNDBadawy SM, Kuhns LM. Economic Evaluation of Text-Messaging and Smartphone-Based Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence in Adolescents with Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Oct 25;4(4):e121. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6425.
PMID: 27780795BACKGROUNDIribarren SJ, Cato K, Falzon L, Stone PW. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170581. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28152012BACKGROUNDBrief J, Chawla A, Lerner D, Vitola B, Woroniecki R, Morganstern J. The Impact of a Smartphone App on the Quality of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparations: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020 Nov 10;3(2):e18174. doi: 10.2196/18174.
PMID: 33170131DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jeffrey Morganstern, MD
Stony Brook University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Subjects were randomly assigned via block randomization to receive either written or software-based prep instructions. To eliminate bias, the four grading gastroenterologists who judged the quality of the subject's cleanout did not know whether subjects had used written or app instructions.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2020
First Posted
October 19, 2020
Study Start
November 15, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Immediately
- Access Criteria
- Email request
I am happy to share all data in whatever way is easiest for everyone