Trapeziectomy Suspensionplasty Versus Carpometacarpal Joint Replacement in Treatment of Basal Thumb Osteoarthritis
Comparison of Trapeziectomy With Suspensionplasty and Carpometacarpal Joint Replacement in Treatment of Basal Thumb Osteoarthritis: Randomised Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares and evaluates differences in movement analysis, patient-reported outcome, radiological assesment and muscular function between patients undergoing carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty with use of modern implants and trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedJanuary 6, 2021
September 1, 2020
Same day
September 25, 2020
January 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in patients reported outcomes - DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand)
To measure overall disabilities of upper limb. Results range from 0 to 100, with lower scores corresponding to better outcomes.
at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Changes in patients reported outcomes - PRWE (Patient Related Wrist Evaluation)
at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Changes in patients reported outcomes - Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionaire
at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Changes in patients reported outcomes - SF-36 (Short Form 36)
at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Changes in patients reported outcome measures - VAS (Visual Analogue Score)
at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Changes in carpometacarpal, carpophalangeal and wrist range of motion
at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergoing trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty for primary basal thumb osteoarthritis
Study group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergoing joint alloplasty using prothesis for primary basal thumb osteoarthritis
Interventions
Surgical removal of trapezium bone and ligamentoplasty of first metacarpal bone using abductor pollicis tendon
Surgical removal of degenerated joint surfaces nad replacement using modern designed prothesis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- osteoarthritis of carpometacarpal joint III or III/IV in Eaton classification assessed by two different radiologists
- symptoms that do not respond to non-operative treatment for 8 weeks
- no counterindications for anaesthesia
- signed agreement for taking a part into trial
You may not qualify if:
- patient do not agree to take a part into study
- problems with communication with patient
- unstable cardiac disease
- reoperations
- previous surgical interventions in hand
- neuro-muscular diseases
- rheumatological background of disease
- diagnosed cervical spine disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Othopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 03-984, Poland
Related Publications (19)
Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB. Prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Dec;87(12):2614-2618. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00104.
PMID: 16322609BACKGROUNDDeiler S. [Basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb]. Orthopade. 2019 Apr;48(4):351-366. doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03707-8. German.
PMID: 30843103BACKGROUNDWeiss AC, Goodman AD. Thumb Basal Joint Arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Aug 15;26(16):562-571. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00374.
PMID: 29969109BACKGROUNDWajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L. Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23;2015(2):CD004631. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004631.pub4.
PMID: 25702783BACKGROUNDMahoney JD, Meals RA. Trapeziectomy. Hand Clin. 2006 May;22(2):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2006.02.003.
PMID: 16701128BACKGROUNDNaram A, Lyons K, Rothkopf DM, Calkins ER, Breen T, Jones M, Shufflebarger JV. Increased Complications in Trapeziectomy With Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition Compared With Trapeziectomy Alone. Hand (N Y). 2016 Mar;11(1):78-82. doi: 10.1177/1558944715617215. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
PMID: 27418894BACKGROUNDSivakumar BS, Graham DJ. APL Lasso Suspensionplasty for Trapeziectomy. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2020 Sep;24(3):108-113. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0000000000000276.
PMID: 31876776BACKGROUNDWang T, Zhao G, Rui YJ, Mi JY. Outcomes of modified trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition for the treatment of advanced thumb carpometacarpal arthritis: Two-year follow-up. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010235.
PMID: 29595674BACKGROUNDRobles-Molina MJ, Lopez-Caba F, Gomez-Sanchez RC, Cardenas-Grande E, Pajares-Lopez M, Hernandez-Cortes P. Trapeziectomy With Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition Versus a Trapeziometacarpal Prosthesis for the Treatment of Thumb Basal Joint Osteoarthritis. Orthopedics. 2017 Jul 1;40(4):e681-e686. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170503-03. Epub 2017 May 8.
PMID: 28481387BACKGROUNDDegeorge B, Dagneaux L, Andrin J, Lazerges C, Coulet B, Chammas M. Do trapeziometacarpal prosthesis provide better metacarpophalangeal stability than trapeziectomy and ligamentoplasty? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Nov;104(7):1095-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
PMID: 30107277BACKGROUNDLane JCE, Rodrigues JN, Furniss D, Burn E, Poulter R, Gardiner MD. Basal thumb osteoarthritis surgery improves health state utility irrespective of technique: a study of UK Hand Registry data. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Jun;45(5):436-442. doi: 10.1177/1753193420909753. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
PMID: 32162998BACKGROUNDParker S, Riley N, Dean B; Oxford Upper Limb Collaborative. Management of osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb. Bone Joint J. 2020 May;102-B(5):600-605. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B5.BJJ-2019-1464.R2.
PMID: 32349588BACKGROUNDAl-Qattan MM, Al Mohrij SA. Mid-Term Results of Partial Trapeziectomy and Simple FCR Tendon Graft Interposition in a Selected Group of Patients with Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis. J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Apr;12(1):43-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698356. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
PMID: 32280181BACKGROUNDShah DS, Middleton C, Gurdezi S, Horwitz MD, Kedgley AE. The Effect of Surgical Treatments for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis on Wrist Biomechanics: A Cadaver Study. J Hand Surg Am. 2020 May;45(5):389-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
PMID: 31733980BACKGROUNDChug M, Williams N, Benn D, Brindley S. Outcome of uncemented trapeziometacarpal prosthesis for treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Indian J Orthop. 2014 Jul;48(4):394-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.136270.
PMID: 25143644BACKGROUNDWajngarten D, Campos JADB, Garcia PPNS. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale in the evaluation of disability - A literature review. Med Lav. 2017 Aug 28;108(4):314-323. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v108i4.6336.
PMID: 28853432BACKGROUNDKroon FPB, Boersma A, Boonen A, van Beest S, Damman W, van der Heijde D, Rosendaal FR, Kloppenburg M. Performance of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Dec;26(12):1627-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
PMID: 30099114BACKGROUNDRosales RS, Garcia-Gutierrez R, Reboso-Morales L, Atroshi I. The Spanish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation outcome measure: cross-cultural adaptation process, reliability, measurement error and construct validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 24;15(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0745-2.
PMID: 28836994BACKGROUNDLins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 2016 Oct 4;4:2050312116671725. doi: 10.1177/2050312116671725. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27757230BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Piotr Stępiński, MD
Medical University of Warsaw
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcomes Assessor will not be informed which type of prosthesis was used in particular patient.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2020
First Posted
October 19, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
January 6, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-09