Effect of Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia on Quality of Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy.
QoR
Is Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy Related to the Type of Anesthesia and Analgesia?
1 other identifier
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) could be related to anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. This study is exploring early QoR after radical prostatectomy in the two groups of anesthesia. The first group had a light general anesthesia with lumbal epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia with morphine and ropivacaine. The second group had general anesthesia and a continuous postoperative analgesia with tramadol. The postoperative QoR was evaluated 24 hours after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2019
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2021
CompletedSeptember 30, 2021
September 1, 2021
2 years
October 7, 2020
September 28, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Visual analog scale of quality of recovery (QoR)
Patient rated visual analog scale is a simple scale for rating the quality of recovery by placing "X" on the line. The scale is 100 millimetres long. Poor recovery is on the left side of the line. Under the end of the left line is an explanation of poor recovery: in severe pain,nausea \& vomiting, confused, immobilized, unable to eat and unable to communicate. Excellent recovery is on the right side of the line. Under the end of the line is a written explanation: without any pain, comfortable, alert, active, enjoying food and communicating freely.
24 hours after surgery
Quality of recovery 40 (QoR-40)
The QoR-40 measures five related dimensions of quality of recovery: emotional state (8 items), physical comfort (12 items), physical independence (5 items), psychological support (7 items) and pain (7 items). Each item is rated on a 5 point Likert scale. Minimal possible score is 40 and maximal possible score is 200.
24 hours after surgery
Quality of recovery 15 (QoR-15)
Quality of recovery (QoR-15) is a short version of QoR - 40 questionnaire. The QoR-15 questionnaire has 15 items scaled from 0 to 10. Minimum score is 0, and maximum 150. It is shorter, user friendly and less time consuming then extensive QoR-40 questionnaire.
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Visual analog scale of pain- at rest and during coughing and straining
24 hours after surgery
Numerical pain scale - at rest and during coughing and straining
24 hours after surgery
Visual pain scale with faces- at rest and during coughing and straining
24 hours after surgery
Visual analog scale of anxiety
24 hours after surgery
Numerical anxiety scale
24 hours after surgery
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Epidural anesthesia and analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATOREpidural catheter insertion: Th 12- L 1 or Th 11 - Th 12 using the midline approach. Safety of the epidural catheter was confirmed with lidocaine 60 mg. Epidural loading dose was given according to our classification (3,4,5 or 6 ml). Postoperative period in urology high care unit. Epidural analgesia ropivacaine/morphine was administered by a urologist according to our classification (2x2 ml, 2x3 ml and 3x3 ml).
Balanced general anesthesia and tramadol analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORPostoperative period in urology high care unit.
Interventions
Epidural anaesthesia: mixture of ropivacaine 6.5 mg/ ml and fentanyl 8.3 μg/ml. Light general anesthesia: isoflurane in mixture of 50/50 of nitrous oxide and oxygen to achieve Minimum alveolar concentration between 0.6 and 0.8.
Before the end of operation was given 4 ml of the mixture of ropivacaine 4.4 mg/ml and morphine 0.8mg/ ml. Epidural analgesia was continued for next 24 hours with a mixture of ropivacaine 2.2 mg/ml and morphine 0.4 mg/ml.
Maintaining general anesthesia: nitrous oxide and oxygen in mixture 50/50 and isoflurane to achieve minimum alveolar concentration between 0.8 and 1. Fentanyl loading dose: 6-8 μg/kg. Additional fentanyl doses were given incrementally.
Tramadol 100 mg in the first hour followed by tramadol 300 mg continuously for the next 24 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective radical Prostatectomy.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system: I, II, III
You may not qualify if:
- Dementia
- Delirium
- Acute psychosis
- Emergent surgery
- Hospitalisation in Intensive care unit
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system: IV
- Reoperations
- Muscular diseases
- Montreal cognitive test \<24 points
- Contraindications for epidural anesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Split
Split, 21000, Croatia
Related Publications (9)
Greg Snow (2020) blockrand: Randomization for Block Random Clinical Trials. R package version 1.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=blockrand
BACKGROUNDStamer UM, Hothker F, Lehnen K, Stuber F. [Postoperative analgesia with tramadol and metamizol. Continual infusion versus patient controlled analgesia]. Anaesthesist. 2003 Jan;52(1):33-41. doi: 10.1007/s00101-002-0427-1. German.
PMID: 12577163BACKGROUNDMyles PS. Measuring quality of recovery in perioperative clinical trials. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):396-401. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000612.
PMID: 29846193BACKGROUNDGornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, Burke JA, Leslie K, Pereira MJ, Bost JE, Kluivers KB, Nilsson UG, Tanaka Y, Forbes A. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;111(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet014. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PMID: 23471753BACKGROUNDMyles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
PMID: 10740540BACKGROUNDStark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
PMID: 23411725BACKGROUNDKleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
PMID: 29397134BACKGROUNDKleif J, Gogenur I. Severity classification of the quality of recovery-15 score-An observational study. J Surg Res. 2018 May;225:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.12.040. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
PMID: 29605019BACKGROUNDCao X, Yumul R, Elvir Lazo OL, Friedman J, Durra O, Zhang X, White PF. A novel visual facial anxiety scale for assessing preoperative anxiety. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 14;12(2):e0171233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171233. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28196099BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ruben Kovac
University Hospital Split, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Split, Croatia
- STUDY CHAIR
Bozidar Duplancic
University Hospital Center Split, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Split, Croatia
- STUDY CHAIR
Ivo Juginovic
University Hospital Split, Department of Urology
- STUDY CHAIR
Ivan Velat
University Hospital Center Split, Department of Urology, Split, Croatia
- STUDY CHAIR
Hrvoje Vucemilovic
University Hospital Center Split, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Split, Croatia
- STUDY CHAIR
Svjetlana Dosenovic
University Hospital Center Split, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Split, Croatia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2020
First Posted
October 14, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 1, 2021
Study Completion
June 1, 2021
Last Updated
September 30, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09