A Novel Approach in Reducing Dental Pain and Anxiety of Pediatric Patient During Local Anesthesia.
1 other identifier
interventional
31
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of sweet in compare to virtual reality (VR) device in reducing injection pain and anxiety associated with local anesthesia in pediatric dental patients. The clinical trial is a randomized split-mouth assignment. Included patients are 5 - 12 years old requiring local anesthetic infiltration with conventional syringe (CS) for conservative treatment of two primary maxillary molars bilaterally. Eligible patients undergo two single-visit treatments after CFSS-DS measurement before each, whereas sweet is allocated to first local anesthesia procedure and VR is allocated to second local anesthesia procedure. Primary outcome measure will be pain felt during injection, reported by patient on visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures: self-reported anxiety during injection on FIS; pain-related behavior according to FLACC scale; heart-rate dynamics; patient preference to local anesthesia method - CS+sweet or CS+VR.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable anxiety
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable anxiety
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 18, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 18, 2021
CompletedNovember 11, 2021
November 1, 2021
4 months
October 2, 2020
November 4, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain felt during injection using visual analogue scale
Self-reported pain by the patient immediately after local anaesthesia infiltration using a VAS (visual analogue scale), containing a combination of Numeric Rating Scale (0-10, where 0 means no pain, 10 - worst possible pain) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale, including pictures of facial expressions with correlating numbers of 0-10 (0 being 'no hurt' and 10 being 'hurts worst'). The combination allows children to pick a facial expression, that corresponds with their pain and see a number that matches it.
Immediately after local anesthetic delivery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain-related behavior evaluated on the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral Pain Rating Scale
During local anesthesia procedure
Self-reported anxiety during injection evaluated on FIS
Immediately after local anesthetic delivery
Heart rate dynamics of the patient
Baseline (Start: in the waiting room), at least 5 minutes before local anaesthesia procedure. End: at least 5 minutes after treatment.
Assessment of self-reported dental fear on CFSS-DS questionnaire
At least 5 minutes before local anesthesia
Study Arms (2)
sweet test group
ACTIVE COMPARATORLocal anesthesia with conventional syringe Procedure: Local anesthesia with conventional syringe + xylitol sublingual tablet Buccal infiltration in posterior maxillary region with traditional technique. A 27 gauge short needle is inserted in the mucobuccal fold above the tooth to be anesthetized.
Virtual reality group
ACTIVE COMPARATORLocal anesthesia with conventional syringe + VR device Device: Local anesthesia with conventional syringe + VR device Virtual reality device (Harga Miniso Vr Glass 3d terbaru) is placed on the face of the patient, playing a video of Tom and Jerry cartoon. Buccal infiltration in posterior maxillary region with traditional technique. A 27 gauge short needle is inserted in the mucobuccal fold above the tooth to be anesthetized.
Interventions
1.8ml of 2%Lidocaine HCl to be administered via a 21mm needle
Virtual reality device (Harga Miniso Vr Glass 3d terbaru) is placed on the face of the patient, playing a video of Tom and Jerry cartoon. Buccal infiltration in posterior maxillary region with traditional technique. A 27 gauge short needle is inserted in the mucobuccal fold above the tooth to be anesthetized
Buccal infiltration in posterior maxillary region with traditional technique. A 27 gauge short needle is inserted in the mucobuccal fold above the tooth to be anesthetized while xylitol tablet putted under tongue
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients, identified as positive or definitely positive through Frankl behavioral rating scale.
- Children, requiring local anesthesia infiltration for conservative treatment of two primary upper jaw molars bilaterally.
- Children without previous experience with local anesthesia for dental treatment.
- Obtained informed consent from parents or gave-givers to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Children who are considered medically compromised or medically complex patients. The absence of disease is confirmed by anamnestic interview with a parent or a care-giver of the child and excludes general acute or chronic disease, cognitive impairment, psychogenic non-epileptic events, sensitivity to flashing light or motion.
- Vision requiring correction with eyeglasses.
- Recent injury to the eyes or face that prevents comfortable use of VR hardware or software.
- Patients who are undergoing therapy with neurological, sedative, analgesic and/or anti-inflammatory drugs 7 days prior to treatment.
- Patients with allergy to local anesthetics, xylitol.
- Children, who are first time ever dental patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
AbdulRahman Alasmari
Riyadh, 11681, Saudi Arabia
Related Publications (11)
Buchanan H, Niven N. Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess child dental anxiety. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002 Jan;12(1):47-52.
PMID: 11853248RESULTMerkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997 May-Jun;23(3):293-7.
PMID: 9220806RESULTvon Baeyer CL, Spagrud LJ. Systematic review of observational (behavioral) measures of pain for children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years. Pain. 2007 Jan;127(1-2):140-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.08.014. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
PMID: 16996689RESULTMalviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Burke C, Merkel S, Tait AR. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Mar;16(3):258-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01773.x.
PMID: 16490089RESULTten Berge M, Veerkamp JS, Hoogstraten J, Prins PJ. Childhood dental fear in the Netherlands: prevalence and normative data. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;30(2):101-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.300203.x.
PMID: 12000350RESULTKeefe FJ, Rumble ME, Scipio CD, Giordano LA, Perri LM. Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science. J Pain. 2004 May;5(4):195-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.576.
PMID: 15162342RESULTLocker D, Thomson WM, Poulton R. Psychological disorder, conditioning experiences, and the onset of dental anxiety in early adulthood. J Dent Res. 2001 Jun;80(6):1588-92. doi: 10.1177/00220345010800062201.
PMID: 11499519RESULTThomson WM, Locker D, Poulton R. Incidence of dental anxiety in young adults in relation to dental treatment experience. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000 Aug;28(4):289-94. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280407.x.
PMID: 10901408RESULTBikmoradi A, Khaleghverdi M, Seddighi I, Moradkhani S, Soltanian A, Cheraghi F. Effect of inhalation aromatherapy with lavender essence on pain associated with intravenous catheter insertion in preschool children: A quasi-experimental study. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;28:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 24.
PMID: 28779942RESULTZhang C, Qin D, Shen L, Ji P, Wang J. Does audiovisual distraction reduce dental anxiety in children under local anesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Dis. 2019 Mar;25(2):416-424. doi: 10.1111/odi.12849. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
PMID: 29498793RESULTMessieha Z. Risks of general anesthesia for the special needs dental patient. Spec Care Dentist. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):21-5; quiz 67-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2008.00058.x.
PMID: 19152564RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
AbdulRahman Alasmari, Resident
Riyadh Elm University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2020
First Posted
October 14, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2020
Primary Completion
February 18, 2021
Study Completion
February 18, 2021
Last Updated
November 11, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share