Stockholm3 Validation Study in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort
SEPTA
SEPTA Trial: Stockholm3 Validation Study in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort for ProsTAte Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
2,152
2 countries
14
Brief Summary
Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly detected cancer in men and is the second leading cause of cancer death. Differences in race and ethnicity have been shown to have differences in PCa incidence, detection, and outcomes. Current prostate cancer screening involves prostatic specific antigen (PSA) which is a nonspecific protein marker (aka kallikrein) that can often leads to unnecessary biopsies (up to 74% benign biopsies) and clinical overdiagnosis (with up to 22% clinically insignificant cancer). Recently more sophisticated tests have been developed for PCa screening in the United States such as the Prostate Health Index (PHI) and the 4k (kallikrein) score, as well as clinical models that use information from the patient clinical history. However, these tests utilize limited serum protein assays and none of the established screening protocols utilize genetic variables to help account for the likely inherited risks as seen in different ethnicities. A recent Swedish, prospective, population-based study, published in the Lancet Oncology, developed a unique multivariable biopsy outcome prediction model within a Nordic population of nearly 60,000 men. This model, the Stockholm3, which incorporated plasma protein markers, germline DNA SNPs as well as clinical variables, was shown to be capable of reducing the number of biopsies by 44% compared to PSA while maintaining adequate sensitivity for detection of PCa. It is unknown whether an approach developed in Sweden that incorporates protein markers, genetics, clinical variables, and genetic ancestry would be beneficial in a racially diverse cohort. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that, a prospectively studied multiethnic cohort of men with the Stockholm3 test will identify unique and common risk factors that improve prostate cancer detection. Aim: To assess the performance of the Stockholm3 test as compared to PSA and to identify unique features associated with PCa in Black/African American (n=500), Asian (n=500), White/Caucasian Hispanic (n=500), and White/Caucasian Non-Hispanic (n=500) men. Methods: The investigators propose a prospectively identified cohort with participating institutions which have screened positive to undergo a prostate biopsy to have a retrospective analysis the Stockholm3 test and ancestry markers. Within this cohort the investigators will examine several predetermined risk factors to investigate their relationship to prostate cancer. This blood sample will be tested for quantitative levels of serum protein markers and DNA will be extracted and will be tested for germline mutations as defined by the Stockholm3 test and other ancestry informative markers. Results from the study will be presented in such a way that no individual information will be disclosed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for all trials
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2023
CompletedOctober 21, 2024
October 1, 2024
3.6 years
September 28, 2020
October 17, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Gleason Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer
International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer. Gleason Grade Group scale is used to grade prostate cancer if found on a scale from 1 to 5. A higher score means a worse outcome.
On prostate biopsy immediately following PSA
Secondary Outcomes (1)
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer or higher risk
On prostate biopsy immediately following PSA
Study Arms (4)
Non-Hispanic/Latino White/Caucasian men
Self-identified as White Non-Hispanic men, with age range (45.0 - 75.0 years), without prior evidence of prostate cancer
African/Black men
Self-identified as African or Black men, with age range (45.0 - 75.0 years), without prior evidence of prostate cancer
Hispanic/Latino White/Caucasian men
Self-identified as White Hispanic men, with age range (45.0 - 75.0 years), without prior evidence of prostate cancer
Asian men
Self-identified as Asian men, with age range (45.0 - 75.0 years), without prior evidence of prostate cancer
Interventions
Venipuncture: Prior to the biopsy the blood will be collected in 2 EDTA (lavender top) x 4 ml tubes will be removed after obtaining consent from the subjects.
Eligibility Criteria
The subjects will be consented for prostate biopsy as part of standard of care. No additional advertising will be used for enrollment. Patients will be identified in clinic which meet the above inclusion criteria for prostate biopsy as part of routine practice. Enrollment will start from date of IRB approval and continue until study enrollment goal. Study enrollment goal will be 2,000 men who have a self-described race/ethnicity of: African/Black (n=500), Asian (n=500), Hispanic White/Caucasian (n=500), and Non-Hispanic White/Caucasian (n=500) men.
You may qualify if:
- All men (age 45.0 - 75.0 years), regardless of race, presenting to a practicing urologist with symptoms that would lead to an evaluation for prostate cancer and who are scheduled to receive a needle biopsy of the prostate
- No prior diagnosis of prostate cancer
You may not qualify if:
- Men who in the three (3) months prior to study participation received any invasive urologic procedure such as biopsy, thermotherapy, microwave therapy, laser therapy, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), urethral catheterization, and lower genitourinary tract endoscopy (cystoscopy)
- Men who were subjected to DRE or prostate manipulation within five (5) days (120 hours) prior to blood sampling
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutetlead
- University of Illinois at Chicagocollaborator
- UroPartnerscollaborator
- University of Chicagocollaborator
- Rush University Medical Centercollaborator
- Montefiore Medical Centercollaborator
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antoniocollaborator
- Cook County Health & Hospitals Systemcollaborator
- Cook County Healthcollaborator
- Stanford Universitycollaborator
- Northwestern Medicinecollaborator
- University of Southern Californiacollaborator
- University Health Network, Torontocollaborator
- Urology Clinics of North Texascollaborator
- LAC+USC Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (14)
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
Northwestern Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Cook County Health System
Chicago, Illinois, 60615, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Uropartners
Westchester, Illinois, 60154, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States
Urology Clinics of North Texas
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Related Publications (18)
Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
PMID: 29552975BACKGROUNDGronberg H, Adolfsson J, Aly M, Nordstrom T, Wiklund P, Brandberg Y, Thompson J, Wiklund F, Lindberg J, Clements M, Egevad L, Eklund M. Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1667-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00361-7. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
PMID: 26563502BACKGROUNDStrom P, Nordstrom T, Aly M, Egevad L, Gronberg H, Eklund M. The Stockholm-3 Model for Prostate Cancer Detection: Algorithm Update, Biomarker Contribution, and Reflex Test Potential. Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
PMID: 29331214BACKGROUNDMoller A, Olsson H, Gronberg H, Eklund M, Aly M, Nordstrom T. The Stockholm3 blood-test predicts clinically-significant cancer on biopsy: independent validation in a multi-center community cohort. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Mar;22(1):137-142. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0082-5. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
PMID: 30171228BACKGROUNDVigneswaran HT, Discacciati A, Gann PH, Gronberg H, Eklund M, Abern MR. Ethnic variation in prostate cancer detection: a feasibility study for use of the Stockholm3 test in a multiethnic U.S. cohort. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Mar;24(1):120-127. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0250-2. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
PMID: 32641739BACKGROUNDSiegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
PMID: 29313949BACKGROUNDPotts JM, Lutz M, Walker E, Modlin C, Klein E. Trends in PSA, age and prostate cancer detection among black and white men from 1990-2006 at a tertiary care center. Cancer. 2010 Aug 15;116(16):3910-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25124.
PMID: 20564087BACKGROUNDMoyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459.
PMID: 22801674BACKGROUNDParekh DJ, Punnen S, Sjoberg DD, Asroff SW, Bailen JL, Cochran JS, Concepcion R, David RD, Deck KB, Dumbadze I, Gambla M, Grable MS, Henderson RJ, Karsh L, Krisch EB, Langford TD, Lin DW, McGee SM, Munoz JJ, Pieczonka CM, Rieger-Christ K, Saltzstein DR, Scott JW, Shore ND, Sieber PR, Waldmann TM, Wolk FN, Zappala SM. A multi-institutional prospective trial in the USA confirms that the 4Kscore accurately identifies men with high-grade prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
PMID: 25454615BACKGROUNDde la Calle C, Patil D, Wei JT, Scherr DS, Sokoll L, Chan DW, Siddiqui J, Mosquera JM, Rubin MA, Sanda MG. Multicenter Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naive Men. J Urol. 2015 Jul;194(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
PMID: 25636659BACKGROUNDRoobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, van der Kwast T, Kummerlin IP, Kweldam CF, van Leenders GJLH. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth. Eur Urol. 2017 Jul;72(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.033. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
PMID: 28162815BACKGROUNDAnkerst DP, Straubinger J, Selig K, Guerrios L, De Hoedt A, Hernandez J, Liss MA, Leach RJ, Freedland SJ, Kattan MW, Nam R, Haese A, Montorsi F, Boorjian SA, Cooperberg MR, Poyet C, Vertosick E, Vickers AJ. A Contemporary Prostate Biopsy Risk Calculator Based on Multiple Heterogeneous Cohorts. Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 16.
PMID: 29778349BACKGROUNDAnkerst DP, Hoefler J, Bock S, Goodman PJ, Vickers A, Hernandez J, Sokoll LJ, Sanda MG, Wei JT, Leach RJ, Thompson IM. Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator 2.0 for the prediction of low- vs high-grade prostate cancer. Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.035.
PMID: 24862395BACKGROUNDLichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, Pukkala E, Skytthe A, Hemminki K. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 13;343(2):78-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430201.
PMID: 10891514BACKGROUNDGronberg H, Eklund M, Picker W, Aly M, Jaderling F, Adolfsson J, Landquist M, Haug ES, Strom P, Carlsson S, Nordstrom T. Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Using a Combination of the Stockholm3 Blood Test and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
PMID: 30001824BACKGROUNDCarroll PH, Mohler JL. NCCN Guidelines Updates: Prostate Cancer and Prostate Cancer Early Detection. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 May;16(5S):620-623. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0036.
PMID: 29784740BACKGROUNDPepe MS, Alonzo TA. Comparing disease screening tests when true disease status is ascertained only for screen positives. Biostatistics. 2001 Sep;2(3):249-60. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/2.3.249.
PMID: 12933537BACKGROUNDVigneswaran HT, Eklund M, Discacciati A, Nordstrom T, Hubbard RA, Perlis N, Abern MR, Moreira DM, Eggener S, Yonover P, Chow AK, Watts K, Liss MA, Thoreson GR, Abreu AL, Sonn GA, Palsdottir T, Plym A, Wiklund F, Gronberg H, Murphy AB; SEPTA STHLM3 Study Group. Stockholm3 in a Multiethnic Cohort for Prostate Cancer Detection (SEPTA): A Prospective Multicentered Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Nov 10;42(32):3806-3816. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00152. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
PMID: 39038251DERIVED
Biospecimen
Venipuncture: Prior to the biopsy the blood will be collected in 2 EDTA (lavender top) x 4 milliliters (8 milliliters total) tubes will be removed after obtaining consent from the subjects. One tube will be immediately centrifuged (10 minutes at 2000G) and plasma decanted to a tube without additives (this typically produces approximately 1.5 milliliters of plasma). The decanted tube (with plasma) and the remaining EDTA tube (with whole blood) is then frozen and stored at -20 degrees Celsius until being shipped to the A3P lab for Stockholm3 testing and analysis at -20 degrees Celsius (unless processing for DNA extraction and plasma analysis). Other biobanked specimens (as described in the Study detailed description) will be collected prospectively and will include plasma and Buffy Coat (used for DNA extraction) utilising the study inclusion and exclusion criteria.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Henrik Grönberg, MD, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2020
First Posted
October 12, 2020
Study Start
December 15, 2019
Primary Completion
July 15, 2023
Study Completion
July 15, 2023
Last Updated
October 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share