Comparison of Cross Pin Configurations in Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Treatment: 2 Pins Versus 3 Pins
The Comparison of Cross Pin Configurations in the Treatment of Gartland Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: 2 Pins Versus 3 Pins
1 other identifier
interventional
45
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to evaluate and compare the outcome of the 2wire vs 3 wire crossed pin configurations in the management of supracondylar humeral fractures in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2020
CompletedOctober 9, 2020
October 1, 2020
5 years
October 5, 2020
October 5, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
functional outcome of two fixation techniques
comparison of Flynn's criteria
5 years
Study Arms (1)
comparison of two cross pin fixation methods
OTHERFixation of supracondylar humerus fractures with 2 crossed pins and 3 crossed pins are compared in terms of Flynn's criteria
Interventions
comparison of two crossed pin fixation methods
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with Type I and Type II injuries, flexion type injuries, open fractures and patients above the age of 12 years were excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2020
First Posted
October 9, 2020
Study Start
January 15, 2015
Primary Completion
January 24, 2020
Study Completion
January 24, 2020
Last Updated
October 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10