A Prospective Study Comparing Three Injection Sites to Detect Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Endometrial Cancer
SENNAN
A Prospective Phase 2 Study Comparing Three Injection Sites to Detect Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Lymphatic Drainages and Location of the Sentinel Lymph Nodes Depending on the Injection Site of the Tracer
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Uterine cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium is the most common histologic type of uterine cancer. Endometrial cancer is the fifth most frequent cancer in women in Switzerland. The incidence rose up to 5.9% in 2015. This tumor affects mainly older women, at 63 years on average. The majority of women are diagnosed at an early stage. Seventy-five to 90% of the patients are alerted by abnormal uterine bleeding very quickly, which allows a quick management of care and a high survival rate. Besides age, one of the main risk factor of developing an endometrial carcinoma is obesity. In fact, obese women have higher risk to have an endometrial cancer, but also at a younger age than the average and finally they have an increased risk of death due to this particular cancer. Although this cancer is linked to the co-morbidities that go with obesity like diabetes or hypertension. The treatment of endometrial cancer in most women is surgery involving a total hysterectomy and a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without a lymph node dissection. For patients with early stage endometrial cancer, there is a disagreement regarding lymph nodes dissection, because randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis have shown no clear evidence on overall or recurrence-free survival and a higher incidence on early and late complications in relation with pelvic lymph node dissection. A systematic lymph node dissection consists of removing all the nodes within a nodal drainage basin. This dissection proves to be very difficult in obese patient and includes a risk to damage blood vessels or nerves. Moreover, lymph node dissection is associated with a higher morbidity, longer operating time, more frequent blood loss and finally symptomatic lymphedema and seroma. That is why, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) seems to be a good alternative to lymph node dissection. The tumor's spread is assessed in lymph nodes with a reduced morbidity. In fact, lymphadenectomy and its dangerous complications, like lymphedema, could be avoided in the vast majority of cases. Indeed, a histological analysis of these sentinel lymph-nodes (SLNs) leads to ultrastadification: cancers are graded depending on the presence and the size of metastasis in lymph nodes. Adjuvant treatments, such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, can be suggested following these data and a better management of endometrial cancer is possible.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedJanuary 27, 2021
January 1, 2021
3.6 years
September 12, 2020
January 25, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Lymphatic route of endometrial cancer dissemination
Comparing the per-operative anatomical locations of uterine SLNs depending on the 3 different injection sites of the tracers: whether in endometrium, in uterine isthmus or in the cervix.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Sensibility/sensitivity of the tracers
1 month
Adverse events
1 month
Additional time required to identify SLNs
1 month
Morbidity directly induced by the search of SLNs
1 month
Negative predictive value of the different markers
1 month
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Arm with procedure: identification of lymphatic drainage of the uterus following 3 sites injections
EXPERIMENTALA radiocolloid (Nanocoll® marked with Technetium 99), a fluorochrome (ICG) and a blue dye (Bleu Patenté®) will be injected in submucosal tissue to see the differences in lymphatic drainage between three different injection sites. Indeed, ICG will be injected under the endometrium, whereas Nanocoll® will be injected in the cervix and Bleu Patenté® in the uterine isthmus, at the transition between the cervix and the uterine corpus.
Interventions
Nanocoll® is injected a day before surgery in the cervix at four points. A lymphoscintigraphy is performed 2 or 3 hours afterward. At the beginning of the surgery, the operative field already in place and before the beginning of laparoscopic, 2ml (10mg) of ICG, distributed in four points around the tumor, is injected under the endometrium intra-myometrial under endoscopic control. As ICG spreads slower than blue dye, ICG is always injected first. Then, Bleu Patenté® is injected at two sites in the uterine isthmus, opposite of the uterine arteries. The risk of false negative results, because a tracer migrated too quickly, is reduced when the injection takes place when patients are already anesthetized.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
- Early endometrial cancers (of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA-IB), whatever histological grade and type
- Primary surgical treatment with hysterectomy
- No metastasis, no other cancers, no recurrency of cancers
- No signs of lymph nodes metastasis on the preoperative workup (MRI +/- positron emission computed tomography)
- No contraindication to laparoscopic procedures.
- Women of \> 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Known severe allergies (antecedents of Quincke oedema, anaphylactic shock,…) and a history of allergy to iodides
- Contraindications to the injected products because of known hypersensitivity or allergy to ICG of blue dye
- Antecedent of pelvic lymph nodes surgery
- Previous lymphadenectomy or surgery that could change the uterine lymphatic drainage (conisation or myomectomy)
- Other diagnosed cancer during treatment or care
- Stage II and above (tumor invading cervix stroma) including those after a neo-adjuvant treatment
- Suspicion of lymph nodes metastasis at preoperative workup
- Medical or uterine conservative treatment
- Patient, who does not understand, speak or write in French
- Drugs that can interfere with ICG : anti convulsants - bisulphite compounds - haloperidol - heroin - pethidine \[meperidine\] - methamizole - methadone - morphine - nitrofurantoin - opium alkaloids - phenobarbitone- phenylbutazone - cyclopropane - probenecid - rifamycin - sodium bisulphite (mostly combined with heparin)
- Radioactive iodine uptake performed less than one week following the use of ICG.
- Hypersensitivity to Nanocoll, to any of the excipients (Stannous chloride, dihydrate Glucose, anhydrous Poloxamer 238 Sodium phosphate, dibasic, anhydrous Sodium phytate, anhydrous) or to any of the components of the labelled radiopharmaceutical.
- A history of hypersensitivity to products containing human albumin
- Hypersensitivity to dyes made of triphenylmethane
- Lymphostasis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHUV department of gynecology
Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrice Mathevet, MD - PhD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of the gynecologic department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2020
First Posted
October 8, 2020
Study Start
January 21, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 27, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 3 years
- Access Criteria
- Request to PI
All data will be accessed under request to the PI.